Operations Management Research

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 103–118

Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing



Commentators suggest that to survive in developed economies manufacturing firms have to move up the value chain, innovating and creating ever more sophisticated products and services, so they do not have to compete on the basis of cost. While this strategy is proving increasingly popular with policy makers and academics there is limited empirical evidence to explore the extent to which it is being adopted in practice. And if so, what the impact of this servitization of manufacturing might be. This paper seeks to fill a gap in the literature by presenting empirical evidence on the range and extent of servitization. Data are drawn from the OSIRIS database on 10,028 firms incorporated in 25 different countries. The paper presents an analysis of these data which suggests that: [i] manufacturing firms in developed economies are adopting a range of servitization strategies—12 separate approaches to servitization are identified; [ii] these 12 categories can be used to extend the traditional three options for servitization—product oriented Product–Service Systems, use oriented Product–Service Systems and result oriented Product–Service Systems, by adding two new categories “integration oriented Product–Service Systems” and “service oriented Product–Service Systems”; [iii] while the manufacturing firms that have servitized are larger than traditional manufacturing firms in terms of sales revenues, at the aggregate level they also generate lower profits as a % of sales; [iv] these findings are moderated by firm size (measured in terms of numbers of employees). In smaller firms servitization appears to pay off while in larger firms it proves more problematic; and [v] there are some hidden risks associated with servitization—the sample contains a greater proportion of bankrupt servitized firms than would be expected.


Manufacturing Service Servitization Product–service systems Value added Globalisation International comparison 


  1. Anderson JC, Narus JA (1995) Capturing the value of supplementary services. Harvard Bus Rev 73:75–83Google Scholar
  2. Baines T, Lightfoot H, Evans S, Neely AD, Greenough R, Peppard J, Roy R, Shehab E, Braganza A, Tiwari A, Alcock J, Angus J, Bastl M, Cousens A, Irving P, Johnson M, Kingston J, Lockett H, Martinez V, Micheli P, Tranfield D, Walton I, Wilson H (2007) State-of-the-art in product service systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:1543–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroth EC, Zakrajsek J, Powers WT, Fox J, Prosser B, Pallix J, Schweikard K (2001) IVHM (Integrated Vehicle Health Management) Techniques for future space vehicles. 37th Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook MB, Bhamra TA, Lemon M (2006) The transfer and application of product service systems: from Academia to UK manufacturing firms. J Clean Prod 14:1455–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M (2006) Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 47:39–48Google Scholar
  6. Delbridge R, Johnson G, Gratton L et al (2006) The exceptional manager: making a difference. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman TL (2005) The world is flat: the globalised world in the twenty-first century. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Gebauer H, Fleisch E, Friedli T (2005) Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. Eur Manag J 23:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glasser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Goedkoop M, van Halen C, Te Riele H, Rommens P (1999) Product service systems: ecological and economic basics. VROM, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  11. Hockerts K, Weaver N (2002) Towards a theory of sustainable product service systems, INSEAD-CMER research workshop on sustainable product service systemsGoogle Scholar
  12. Manzini E, Verzzoli Z (2002) Product–service systems and sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Defence (2005) Defence industrial strategy. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Mont O (ed) (2004) Product–service systems: panacea or myth. Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  15. Mont O, Plepys A (eds) (2003) Customer satisfaction: review of literature and application to the product–service systems. International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  16. Morelli N (2002) Designing product/service systems: a methodological exploration. Des Issues 18:3–17Google Scholar
  17. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter M, Ketels C (2003) UK competitiveness: moving to the next stage. Department of Trade and Industry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Reinartz W, Ulaga W (2008) How to sell services more profitably. Harvard Bus Rev 86:90–96Google Scholar
  20. Roth AV, Menor LJ (2003) Insights into service operations management: a research agenda. Prod Oper Manag 12:145–163Google Scholar
  21. Slack N (2005) Patterns of servitization: beyond products and service. Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2008) The emergence of service science: toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Prod Oper Manag 17:238–246Google Scholar
  23. Tukker A, Tischner U (eds) (2006) New business for old Europe: product–service development, competitiveness and sustainability. Greenleaf, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  24. Tukker A, van Halen C (2003) Innovation scan for product service systems. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Vandermerwe S, Rada J (1988) Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. Eur Manag J 6:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Voss C, Zomerdijk L (2007) Innovation in experiential services—an empirical view. Advanced Institute of Management Research/London Business School, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Wise R, Baumgartner P (1999) Go downstream: the new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Bus Rev 7:133–141Google Scholar
  29. Wu L, Yue X, Sim T (2006) Supply chain clusters: a key to China’s cost advantage. Supply Chain Manag Rev 10:46–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for ManufacturingUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Cranfield School of ManagementCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations