Food Insecurity among Europeans Aged 50+
Using data from the fifth wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, this study investigates the association between food insecurity (FI) and several demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in a sample of individuals aged 50 and over in 15 European countries. On average, approximately 12% of individuals that eat meat/fish/poultry or fruit/vegetables less than 3 times per week cannot afford to eat these food items more often. Our Heckman probit analysis reveals that being employed, having higher levels of education and household income are associated with a lower probability of being unable to afford meat/fish/poultry or fruit/vegetables on a regular basis. Pronounced country-specific heterogeneity is also observed in food unaffordability: relative to Germany, the Eastern and Southern European countries, particularly the Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Italy, and Spain, are more vulnerable to food unaffordability. Nonlinear decompositional results show that household income and being employed are the two main contributors to the food unaffordability gap between high FI and low FI prevalence among European countries.
KeywordsFood unaffordability Heckman probit model Decompositional analysis Europeans
This paper uses data from SHARE Wave 5 (DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w5.100; see Börsch-Supan et al. 2013, for methodological details). The SHARE data collection was primarily funded by the European Commission through the FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: N°227822, SHARE M4: N°261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064) and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org). We would like to thank those who provided the data needed for this paper, although the findings, interpretations, and conclusions are entirely our own. We would also like to thank two anonymous referees for valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- AGE Platform Europe. (2012). Older people also suffer because of the crisis. Brussels: AGE Platform Europe.Google Scholar
- Anderson, S. A. (1990). Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations. Journal of Nutrition, 120(11S), 1559–1600.Google Scholar
- Börsch-Supan, A., & Jürges, H. (2005). The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe – methodology. Mannheim: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
- Che, J., & Chen, J. J. (2001). Food insecurity in Canadian households. Health Reports, 12(4), 11–21.Google Scholar
- Elanco. (2015). Dimensions of food security in Europe. Basel: Elanco.Google Scholar
- European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. (2012). Europeans’ attitudes towards food security, food quality and the countryside. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. W. (1999). The absence of the African-American owned business: an analysis of the dynamics of self-employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(1), 80–108.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Addressing path dependence and incorporating sample weights in the nonlinear blinder-Oaxaca technique for logit, probit and other nonlinear models. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
- FAO, IFAD and WFP. (2015). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Katsikas, D., Karakitsios, A., Filinis, K., & Petralias, A. (2014). Social profile report on poverty social exclusion and inequality before and after the crisis in Greece. Athens: Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology.Google Scholar
- Malter, F., & Börsch-Supan, A. (2015). SHARE wave 5: Innovations & Methodology. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
- Ready for Ageing Alliance. (2015). The myth of the baby boomer: ready for ageing alliance. London: Ready for Ageing Alliance.Google Scholar