Advertisement

Determinants of Intra-Region and Extra-Region Foreign Direct Investment Inflow in ASEAN: A Spatial Econometric Analysis

  • Hong Hiep HoangEmail author
  • Michaël Goujon
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the dominant forms of foreign direct investment (FDI) (horizontal, vertical, export-platform, and complex vertical) in ASEAN countries. To account for the heterogeneity in FDI forms according to their origins, we examine separately extra-ASEAN and intra-ASEAN FDI in ASEAN countries. Using macro-level annual data covering nine countries over 1999–2011 and spatial econometric models, we find that the significance and the signs of the coefficients for the determinants of FDI and of spatial interactions provide an indirect way to test the dominance of particular forms of FDI over others. Our results suggest that the location of extra-ASEAN FDI is affected by host country characteristics (such as market size, infrastructure quality, political stability, trade costs) and by FDI in neighboring countries. Then, extra-ASEAN FDI inflows seem to be dominated by complex vertical FDI. In contrast, the location of intra-ASEAN FDI is affected by a host country’s political stability and market size, but also by the market potential of neighboring markets, suggesting that intra-ASEAN FDI inflows are dominated by export-platform FDI. The significance of spatial interactions for both origins of flows warrants the acceleration of economic integration between ASEAN countries to continuously attract FDI.

Keywords

Foreign direct investment ASEAN Determinants Spatial model 

JEL Classification

F21 F23 E22 R12 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

I do not have any conflict of interest regarding this paper or anything related to this subject.

References

  1. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L., & Florax, R. J. (1995). Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: Some further results. In L. Anselin & R. J. Florax (Eds.), New directions in spatial econometrics (pp. 21–74). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L. (2005). Exploring spatial data with GeoDaTM: a workbook. Urbana, 51(61801)Google Scholar
  4. Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin, L., Le Gallo, J., & Jayet, H. (2008). Spatial panel econometrics. In The econometrics of panel data (pp. 625–660). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artige, L., & Nicolini, R. (2010). Market potential, productivity and foreign direct investment: Some evidence from three case studies. European Planning Studies, 18(2), 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anselin, L., & Rey, S. (1991). Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical analysis, 23(2), 112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2007). Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics, 140, 260–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2008). Estimating regional trade agreement effects of FDI in an interdependent world. Journal of Econometrics, 145, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barros, C. P., Caporale, G. M., & Damásio, B. (2013). Foreign direct investment in the Asian Economies, Working Paper No. 13–20. London: Brunel University.Google Scholar
  11. Blattner, T. S. (2005). What drives foreign direct investment in Southeast Asia? A dynamic panel approach. Mimeo: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R. B., Waddell, G. R., & Naughton, H. T. (2007). FDI in space: Spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 51, 1303–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowles, P. (1997). ASEAN, AFTA and the “new regionalism”. Pacific Affairs, 70, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casi, L., & Resmini, L. (2010). Evidence on the determinants of foreign direct investment: The case of EU regions. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1, 93–118.Google Scholar
  15. Chia, S. Y. (2011). Association of Southeast Asian Nations economic integration: Developments and challenges. Asian Economic Policy Review, 6(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chou, K. H., Chen, C. H., & Mai, C. C. (2011). The impact of third-country effects and economic integration on China's outward FDI. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2154–2163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coughlin, C. C., & Segev, E. (2000). Foreign direct investment in China: A spatial economic study. The World Economy, 23, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Eichengreen, B., & Tong, H. (2007). Is China's FDI coming at the expense of other countries? Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 21(2), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., & Markusen, J. R. (2007). Export-platform foreign direct investment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4), 776–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elhorst, J. P. (2003). Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elhorst, J. P. (2009). Spatial panel data models. In M. M. Fischer & A. Getis (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis (pp. 377–407). Berlin Heidelberg. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. El-Sahli, Z., Gullstrand, J., & Olofsdotter, K. (2017). Exploring outward FDI and the choice of destination: Evidence from Swedish firm-level data. Applied Economics Letters, 1–4.Google Scholar
  24. Garretsen, H., & Peeters, J. (2009). FDI and the relevance of spatial linkages: Do third-country effects matter for Dutch FDI? Review of World Economics, 145, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groh, A. P., & Wich, M. (2012). Emerging economies' attraction of foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2), 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hattari, R., Rajan, R. S., & Thangavelu, S. (2013). Intra-ASEAN FDI flows and the role of China and India: Trends and determinants. In T. Cavoli, S. Listokin, & R. S. Rajan (Eds.), Issues in governance, growth and globalisation in Asia (chapter 5). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoang, H. H. (2012). Foreign direct investment in Southeast Asia: Determinants and spatial distribution, Working Paper No. 30, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.Google Scholar
  30. Hoang, H. H., & Bui, D. H. (2015). Determinants of foreign direct investment in ASEAN: A panel approach. Management Science Letters, 5(2), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoang, H. H., & Goujon, M. (2014). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Vietnamese provinces: A spatial econometric analysis. Post-Communist Economies, 26(1), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ismail, N. W. (2009). The determinant of foreign direct investment in ASEAN: A semi-gravity approach. Transition Studies Review, 16(3), 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ledyaeva, S. (2009). Spatial econometric analysis of foreign direct investment determinants in Russian regions. The World Economy, 32(4), 643–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics (statistics, textbooks, and monographs). CRC Press.Google Scholar
  35. Markusen, J. R. (1984). Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 16(3–4), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Markusen, J. R. (1997). Trade versus investment liberalization. NBER Working Paper 6231.Google Scholar
  37. Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. (2002). Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Review of International Economics, 10(4), 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Masron, T. A. (2013). Promoting intra-ASEAN FDI: The role of AFTA and AIA. Economic Modelling, 31, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masron, T. A., & Nor, E. (2013). FDI in ASEAN-8: Does institutional quality matter? Applied Economics Letters, 20(2), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masron, T. A., & Yusop, Z. (2012). The ASEAN investment area, other FDI initiatives, and intra-ASEAN foreign direct investment. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 26(2), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ni, B., Spatareanu, M., Manole, V., Otsuki, T., & Yamada, H. (2017). The origin of FDI and domestic firms’ productivity—Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petri, P. A., Plummer, M. G., & Zhai, F. (2012). ASEAN economic community: A general equilibrium analysis. Asian Economic Journal, 26(2), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plummer, M. G., & Cheong, D. (2009). FDI effects of ASEAN integration. Région et Développement, 49–67.Google Scholar
  44. Poelhekke, S., & van der Ploeg, F. (2009). Foreign direct investment and urban concentrations: Unbundling spatial lags. Journal of Regional Science, 49(4), 749–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rammal, H. G., & Zurbruegg, R. (2006). The impact of regulatory quality on intra-foreign direct investment flows in the ASEAN markets. International Business Review, 15(4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Regelink, M., & Elhorst, J. P. (2015). The spatial econometrics of FDI and third country effects. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seldadyo, H., Elhorst, J. P., & De Haan, J. (2010). Geography and governance: Does space matter? Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shepotylo, O. (2012). Spatial complementarity of FDI: The example of transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 24(3), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smarzynska Javorcik, B. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thangavelu, S. M., & Narjoko, D. (2014). Human capital, FTAs and foreign direct investment flows into ASEAN. Journal of Asian Economics, 35, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uttama, N. P., & Peridy, N. (2009). The impact of regional integration and third-country effects on FDI: Evidence from ASEAN. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(3), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeaple, S. R. (2003). The complex integration strategies of multinationals and cross country dependencies in the structure of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 60(2), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences of the Central Region (ISSCR)Vietnam Academy of Social SciencesDa Nang CityVietnam
  2. 2.Centre d′Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International (CERDI)University of Auvergne, CNRSClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations