Advertisement

Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 831–845 | Cite as

An Analysis of Modes of Commuting in Urban and Rural Areas

  • Xiangwu TaoEmail author
  • Zongtang Fu
  • Alexis J. Comber
Article
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

This study compares global and local analyses of non-car commuting modes and the probability of increasing modes use in different urban and rural areas for a case study in Yorkshire, UK, with commuter residence areas used as the response variable. The analyses compared Generalized Linear Models of commuting by bus, cycling and walking to estimate the probability of increasing sustainable modes use in commuters in urban areas, relative to rural areas. The three variables were found to be significant predictors for the models and indicate differential odds of commuting from urban areas relative to rural ones. An analysis of the non-stationarity of was undertaken using a Geographically Weighted Regression analysis, which showed how the probability of residing in a particular type of urban and rural area, as described by commuting patterns, varied spatially within the study region. The local analyses provide a critical information able to support and guide local policy in its ambition to increase sustainable transport modes and to reduce car dependence in both rural and urban areas.

Keywords

Commuting mode Generalized linear model Spatial variation Geographically weighted regression 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the China Scholarship Council (grant number 201606405025).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anable, J. (2005). ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy, 12(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baiocchi, G., Creutzig, F., Minx, J., & Pichler, P. P. (2015). A spatial typology of human settlements and their CO 2 emissions in England. Global Environmental Change, 34, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, M. J., & Hess, S. (2016). Willingness to accept longer commutes for better salaries: Understanding the differences within and between couples. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 91, 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. Beirão, G., & Cabral, J. S. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibby, P., & Brindley, P. (2013). The 2011 rural-urban classification for small area geographies: A user guide and frequently asked questions (v1. 0). UK Government Statistical Service.Google Scholar
  6. Bowman, A. W. (1984). An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimates. Biometrika, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., & Charlton, M. E. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28(4), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Walking and cycling in Western Europe and the United States: Trends, policies, and lessons. TR News, (280).Google Scholar
  9. Champion, T. (2009). Urban–rural differences in commuting in England: A challenge to the rural sustainability agenda? Planning Practice and Research, 24(2), 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlton, M., Fotheringham, S., & Brunsdon, C. (2009). Geographically weighted regression. White paper. National Centre for Geocomputation. National University of Ireland Maynooth.Google Scholar
  11. Chasco, C., García, I., & Vicéns, J. (2007). Modeling spatial variations in household disposable income with geographically weighted regression.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., & Melia, S. (2016). Changes to commute mode: The role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 89, 89–105.Google Scholar
  13. Comber, A. J., Brunsdon, C., & Radburn, R. (2011). A spatial analysis of variations in health access: Linking geography, socio-economic status and access perceptions. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(1), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dujardin, S., Pirart, F., Brevers, F., Marique, A. F., & Teller, J. (2012). Home-to-work commuting, urban form and potential energy savings: A local scale approach to regional statistics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(7), 1054–1065.Google Scholar
  15. Fan, J. X., Wen, M., & Wan, N. (2017). Built environment and active commuting: Rural-urban differences in the US. SSM-Population Health, 3, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Francisco, E., Whigham, P., Aranha, F., & Zambaldi, F. (2008). A consumer income predicting model based on survey data: An analysis using geographically weighted regression (Gwr). ACR Latin American Advances. Google Scholar
  17. Gollini, I., Lu, B., Charlton, M., Brunsdon, C., & Harris, P. (2013). GWmodel: an R package for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.0413.Google Scholar
  18. Goodman, A. (2013). Walking, cycling and driving to work in the English and welsh 2011 census: Trends, socio-economic patterning and relevance to travel behaviour in general. PLoS One, 8(8), e71790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene, D. L., & Wegener, M. (1997). Sustainable transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(3), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene, D. L., Jones, D. W., & Delucchi, M. A. (1997). The full costs and benefits of transportation: Contributions to theory, method and measurement; with 62 tables. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  21. Jakob, A., Craig, J. L., & Fisher, G. (2006). Transport cost analysis: A case study of the total costs of private and public transport in Auckland. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katz, P., Scully, V., & Bressi, T. W. (1994). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community (Vol. 10). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, C., Sang, S., Chun, Y., & Lee, W. (2012). Exploring urban commuting imbalance by jobs and gender. Applied Geography, 32(2), 532–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kingham, S., Dickinson, J., & Copsey, S. (2001). Travelling to work: Will people move out of their cars. Transport Policy, 8(2), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitamura, R. (1989). A causal analysis of car ownership and transit use. Transportation, 16(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, T., Corcoran, J., Pullar, D., Robson, A., & Stimson, R. (2009). A geographically weighted regression method to spatially disaggregate regional employment forecasts for south East Queensland. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2(2), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Limtanakool, N., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2006). The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium-and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(5), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Litman, T. (2011). Introduction to multi-modal transportation planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 15.Google Scholar
  29. Lloyd, C. D. (2014). Exploring spatial scale in geography. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd, C. D. (2016). Spatial scale and small area population statistics for England and Wales. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(6), 1187–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lovelace, R., Ballas, D., & Watson, M. (2014). A spatial microsimulation approach for the analysis of commuter patterns: From individual to regional levels. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mann, E., & Abraham, C. (2006). The role of affect in UK commuters' travel mode choices: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mennis, J. (2006). Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression. The Cartographic Journal, 43(2), 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ONS (2011). 2011 Census-England and Wales output geography: Policy and products. ONS.Google Scholar
  35. Sapiro, P. (2016). Beyond the strictly orthodox/mainstream divide: Applying geodemographic analysis to a small nationwide sub-population. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 56, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M., & Dijst, M. (2001). Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharkey, J. R., & Horel, S. (2008). Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and minority composition are associated with better potential spatial access to the ground-truthed food environment in a large rural area. The Journal of Nutrition, 138(3), 620–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shoff, C., Yang, T. C., & Matthews, S. A. (2012). What has geography got to do with it? Using GWR to explore place-specific associations with prenatal care utilization. GeoJournal, 77(3), 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Susilo, Y. O., & Kitamura, R. (2008). Structural changes in commuters’ daily travel: The case of auto and transit commuters in the Osaka metropolitan area of Japan, 1980–2000. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 95–115.Google Scholar
  40. Titheridge, H., & Hall, P. (2006). Changing travel to work patterns in south East England. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(1), 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Travisi, C. M., Camagni, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2010). Impacts of urban sprawl and commuting: A modelling study for Italy. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilding, S., Martin, D., & Moon, G. (2016). The impact of limiting long term illness on internal migration in England and Wales: New evidence from census microdata. Social Science & Medicine, 167, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodcock, J., Edwards, P., Tonne, C., Armstrong, B. G., Ashiru, O., Banister, D., et al. (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Urban land transport. The Lancet, 374(9705), 1930–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang, L., Hipp, J. A., Adlakha, D., Marx, C. M., Tabak, R. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Choice of commuting mode among employees: Do home neighborhood environment, worksite neighborhood environment, and worksite policy and supports matter? Journal of Transport & Health, 2(2), 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang, H., Lu, X., Cherry, C., Liu, X., & Li, Y. (2017). Spatial variations in active mode trip volume at intersections: A local analysis utilizing geographically weighted regression. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Land Science and TechnologyChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations