Advertisement

Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 493–514 | Cite as

Measuring Spatial Distributions of Secondary Education Achievement in Australia

  • Yogi VidyattamaEmail author
  • Jinjing Li
  • Riyana Miranti
Article

Abstract

Education has long been seen as a crucial factor to the economic wellbeing and achievement of people and localities. Therefore, inequality of educational attainment often precedes inequalities in other aspects of life. Although Australia mandates compulsory secondary education, the outcomes vary nationwide. Concern has been expressed about the gap in educational achievement between rural and urban areas. This study analyses regional inequalities of secondary school education outcomes by examining spatial disparities among smaller spatial units and how factors contributing to secondary school education outcomes perform regionally. The results confirm a rural–urban disparity, reveal disparities within regional capital cities and indicate that some rural areas, especially in Victoria, perform relatively well. Disparities are triggered by socio-economic conditions and by the quantity of resources devoted to school systems. Wealthier areas generally provide better resources.

Keywords

Education Spatial distribution Urban-rural inequality Measurement Australia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the Higher Education Participation and Partnerships Programme (HEPPP), Department of Education and Training, Australia. Parts of the data used in this publication are sourced from the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) and are available from ACARA in accordance with its Data Access Protocols.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135.Google Scholar
  2. Abello, A., Cassells, R., Daly, A., D’Souza, G., & Miranti, R. (2015). Youth social exclusion in Australian communities: A new index. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1048-9.
  3. ABS. (2011a). Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 5 - remoteness structure, July 2011. 1270.0.55.005.Google Scholar
  4. ABS. (2011b). Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 1 - main structure and greater Capital City statistical areas, July 2011. 1270.0.55.001.Google Scholar
  5. ABS. (2013). Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2011. Technical Paper 2033.0.55.001.Google Scholar
  6. Ainsworth, J. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117–152.Google Scholar
  7. Alm, J., & Winters, J. (2009). Distance and intrastate college student migration. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 728–738.Google Scholar
  8. Anselin, L. (2004). GeoDa 0.95i release notes. Spatial Analysis Laboratory (SAL), Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  9. Azzoni, C. R., & Servo, L. (2002). Education, cost of living and regional wage inequality in Brazil. Papers in Regional Science, 81(2), 157–175.Google Scholar
  10. Badcock, B. A. (1977). Educational achievement and participation rates in Sydney. The Australian Geographer, 13(5), 325–331.Google Scholar
  11. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., & Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (EPI Briefing Paper No. 278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Baum, S., & Gleeson, B. (2010). Space and place: Social exclusion in Australia's suburban heartlands. Urban Policy and Research, 28(2), 135–159.Google Scholar
  13. Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115–151.Google Scholar
  14. Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In W. Lee Hansen (Ed.), Education, income, and human capital (pp. 11–70). New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  15. Burnett, B., & Lampert, J. (2016). Re-thinking teacher quality in high-poverty schools in Australia. In Education, equity, economy: Crafting a new intersection (pp. 51-72). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Card, D. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In N. Christofides Louis, E. K. Grant, & R. Swidinsky (Eds.), Aspects of labour market behaviour: Essays in honour of John Vanderkamp (pp. 201–222). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1990). Does school quality matter returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States (no. w3358). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  18. Chakraborty, K., & Blackburn, V. C. (2013). Efficiency and equity in funding for government schools in Australia. Australian Economic Papers, 52(3–4), 127–142.Google Scholar
  19. Cheers, B. (1990). Rural disadvantage in Australia. Australian Social Work, 43(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Considine, G., & Zappalà, G. (2002). The influence of social and economic disadvantage in the academic performance of school students in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 38(2), 129–148.Google Scholar
  22. Dyson, A., & Raffo, C. (2007). Education and disadvantage: Therole of community-oriented schools. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 297–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701324685.Google Scholar
  23. Frenette, M. (2004). Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter? Canadian Public Policy, 30(4), 427–443.Google Scholar
  24. Frigo, T., Bryce, J., Anderson, M., & McKenzie, P. (2007). Australian young people, their families and post-school plans: A research review (pp. 1–34). Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research (ACER).Google Scholar
  25. Gibbons, S., & Vignoles, A. (2012). Geography, choice and participation in higher education in England. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1), 98–113.Google Scholar
  26. Golding, B. (2004). Who's doing the hunting and gathering?: An exploration of gender segmentation of adult learning in small and remote communities. Adelaide: NCVER.Google Scholar
  27. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 351–388.Google Scholar
  28. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–1177.Google Scholar
  29. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–62.Google Scholar
  30. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 19(2), 141–164.Google Scholar
  31. Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64–F98.Google Scholar
  32. Harrington, M. (2011). Australian government funding for schools explained. Parliamentary Library Background Note.Google Scholar
  33. Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482.Google Scholar
  34. Higgins, M. J., Levy, D., & Young, A. T. (2006). Growth and convergence across the United States: Evidence from county-level data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 671–681.Google Scholar
  35. HREOC. (2000). Recommendation: National Inquiry into rural and remote education. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.Google Scholar
  36. Ibourk, A., & Amaghouss, J. (2014). The performance of educational system in Morocco: A spatial analysis. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 14(2), 109–128.Google Scholar
  37. Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136.Google Scholar
  38. Jepsen, C., & Montgomery, M. (2009). Miles to go before I learn: The effect of travel distance on the mature persons choice of a community college. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 64–73.Google Scholar
  39. Kavroudakis, D., Ballas, D., & Birkin, M. (2013). Using spatial microsimulation to model social and spatial inequalities in educational attainment. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 6(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  40. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.Google Scholar
  41. Li, J., Miranti, R., & Vidyattama, Y. (2017). What matters in education: A decomposition of educational outcomes with multiple measures. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(1–2), 3–25.Google Scholar
  42. List, J. A., Livingston, J. A., & Neckermann, S. (2012). Harnessing complementarities in the education production function. Working Paper. Available at https://econresearch.uchicago.edu/sites/econresearch.uchicago.edu/files/Livingston_AWFE%20version.pdf.
  43. Long, B. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1), 271–296.Google Scholar
  44. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.Google Scholar
  45. Lupton, R. (2004) Schools in disadvantaged areas: Recognising context and raising quality. Case paper 76 (London, Centre for the Analysis of social exclusion, London School of Economics).Google Scholar
  46. Mahuteau, S., & Mavromaras, K. (2014). An analysis of the impact of socio-economic disadvantage and school quality on the probability of school dropout. Education Economics, 22(4), 389–411.Google Scholar
  47. Miranti, R., Daly, A., & Tanton, R. (2015). An area-based measure of risk of social exclusion for Australian school-aged children. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 21(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
  48. Nepal, B., Tanton, R., & Harding, A. (2010). Measuring housing stress: How much do definitions matter? Urban Policy and Research, 28(2), 211–224.Google Scholar
  49. Noble, M., Barnes, H., Wright, G., & Roberts, B. (2010). Small area indexes of multiple deprivation in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 95, 281–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9460-7.Google Scholar
  50. O’Brien, M., & Jones, D. (1999). Children, parental employment and educational attainment: An English case study. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(5), 599–621.Google Scholar
  51. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Qian, X., & Smyth, R. (2008). Measuring regional inequality of education in China: Widening coast–inland gap or widening rural–urban gap? Journal of International Development, 20(2), 132–144.Google Scholar
  53. Quiggin, J. (1999). Human capital theory and education policy in Australia. Australian Economic Review, 32(2), 130–144.Google Scholar
  54. Ramburuth, P., & McCormick, J. (2001). Learning diversity in higher education: a comparative study of Asian international and Australian students. Higher Education, 42(3), 333–350.Google Scholar
  55. Randolph, B., & Holloway, D. (2005). Social disadvantage, tenure and location: An analysis of Sydney and Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research, 23(2), 173–201.Google Scholar
  56. Rey, S. J., & Janikas, M. V. (2005). Regional convergence, inequality, and space. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2), 155–176.Google Scholar
  57. Roberts, P., & Green, B. (2013). Researching rural places on social justice and rural education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 765–774.Google Scholar
  58. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tselios, V. (2011). Mapping the European regional educational distribution. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), 358–374.Google Scholar
  59. Roscigno, V. J., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Crowley, M. (2006). Education and the inequalities of place. Social Forces, 84(4), 2121–2145.Google Scholar
  60. Rowe, F., Bell, M., & Corcoran, J. (2014). Determinants of post-school choices of young people: The workforce, university or vocational studies? Queensland Centre for Population Research (QCPR). School of Geography, planning and environmental management. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  61. Rumberger, R., & Palardy, G. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 3–42.Google Scholar
  62. Scheerens, J., Witziers, B., & Steen, R. (2013). A meta-analysis of school effectiveness studies. Revista de educacion, 2013(361), 619–645.Google Scholar
  63. Seth, S., & McGillivray, M. (2016). Composite indices, alternative weights, and comparison robustness. In OPHI working paper 106. Oxford: University of.Google Scholar
  64. Suhonen, T. (2013). Are there returns from university location in a state-funded university system? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(3), 465–478.Google Scholar
  65. Summers, A. A., & Wolfe, B. L. (1977). Do schools make a difference? The American Economic Review, 67, 639–652.Google Scholar
  66. Tanton, R., Harding, A., Daly, A., McNamara, J., & Yap, M. (2010). Australian children at risk of social exclusion: A spatial index for gauging relative disadvantage. Population, Space and Place, 16(2), 135–150.Google Scholar
  67. Thomson, S. (2016). Australian schools continue to fall behind other countries in maths and science. The Conversation. Available in http://theconversation.com/australian-schools-continue-to-fall-behind-other-countries-in-maths-and-science-69341.
  68. Tselios, V. (2008). Income and educational inequalities in the regions of the European Union: Geographical spillovers under welfare state restrictions. Papers in Regional Science, 87(3), 403–430.Google Scholar
  69. UN. (2016). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone, the United Nations development Programme. New: York.Google Scholar
  70. UNDP. (2004). National Human Development Report 2004. The Economics of Democracy: Financing Human Development in Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  71. Vidyattama, Y. (2010). A search for Indonesia's regional growth determinants. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(3), 281–294.Google Scholar
  72. Vidyattama, Y., Tanton, R., & Nepal, B. (2013). The effect of transport costs on housing-related financial stress in Australia. Urban Studies, 50(9), 1779–1795.Google Scholar
  73. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM), Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis (IGPA)University of CanberraBruceAustralia

Personalised recommendations