Advertisement

Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 481–510 | Cite as

Spatial, Temporal and Hierarchical Variability of the Factors Driving Urban Growth: A Case Study of the Treasure Valley of Idaho, USA

  • Khila DahalEmail author
  • Eric Lindquist
Article

Abstract

Urban landscape is a system of hierarchically nested spatial structures or land patches with their distinct dynamics and causal factors. The lower level structures evolve together to give out different forms, patterns and extents during the process of urbanization. An understanding of driving factors of these hierarchical structures has important implications for future land use planning and urban management. Adopting an innovative framework of urban patch hierarchy, this study investigates the drivers and spatiotemporal variability of their explanatory power at urban and intra-urban patch levels, with Treasure Valley of Idaho, USA as a case of study. We calibrated global and local logistic regression models against a set of 18 spatialized variables. Results show that growth drivers and their impact vary both across the study site and along the cycles of urbanization at different levels of urban landscape. Urban agglomeration factors including the proximity to urbanized area had the highest impact on new development, urban growth forms and land uses. Factors were less stable at the lower level because of their subtle interconnectedness with local structures. The study further revealed an existence of distinct patterns of association among the growth forms, land use types, and the included factors. Specific growth forms and land use classes demonstrated identical temporal patterns with certain driving factors.

Keywords

Urban growth Local logistic regression Growth drivers Spatial patterns Urban growth forms, hierarchical approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

‘The project described was supported by NSF award number IIA-1301792 from the NSF Idaho EPSCoR Program and by the National Science Foundation.’

References

  1. Aguayo, M., Wiegand, T., Azocar, G., Wiegand, K., & Vega, C. (2007). Revealing the driving forces of mid-cities urban growth patterns using spatial modeling: A case study of Los Angeles, Chile. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J., Hardy, E., Roach, J., & Witmer, R. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data (28 PP). Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P., German, S., Sear, D., & Clark, M. (2003). Exploring the relations between riverbank erosion and geomorphological controls using geographically weighted logistic regression. Geographical Analysis, 35(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batisani, N., & Yarnal, B. (2009). Urban expansion in Center County, Pennsylvania: Spatial dynamics and landscape transformations. Applied Geography, 29(2), 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319, 769–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatta, B. (2010). Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blueprint Boise. (2011). Planning area policy. Working paper by the City of Boise, Idaho. Accessed December 10, 2015 from: http://pds.cityofboise.org/media/151889/Blueprint_4.5.pdf
  8. Burgi, M., Hersperger, A., & Schneeberger, N. (2004). Driving forces of landscape change – Current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 19, 857–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casetti, E., & Jones III, J. P. (1992). Applications of the expansion method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, J., & Masser, I. (2003). Urban growth pattern modeling: A case study of Wuhan city, PR China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(4), 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, S., Lambert, D., & Chen, Z. (2010). Geographically weighted regression bandwidth selection and spatial autocorrelation: An empirical example using Chinese agriculture data. Applied Economics Letters, 17, 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, K., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 24, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. COMPASS (Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho) (2014) Working together to plan for the future project. Accessed September 24, 2014 from: http://www.compassidaho.org/index.html
  14. da Silva, P., Berg, M., Serrano, A., Dubs, F., & Sousa, J. (2012). Environmental factors at different spatial scales governing soil fauna community patterns in fragmented forests. Landscape Ecology, 27(9), 1337–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahal, K., & Chow, E. (2014). An agent-integrated irregular automata model of urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(11), 2281–2303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahal, K., Benner, S., & Lindquist, E. (2017a). Urban hypotheses and spatiotemporal characterization of urban growth in the Treasure Valley of Idaho, USA. Applied Geography, 79, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahal, K., Benner, S., & Lindquist, E., (2017b). Analyzing spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization in Treasure Valley, Idaho, USA. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, Published online Dec 16, 2016. doi:  10.1007/s12061-016-9215-1.
  18. Dewan, A., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). Land use and land cover change in greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Applied Geography, 29(3), 390–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubovyk, O., Sliuzas, R., & Flacke, J. (2011). Spatiotemporal modeling of informal settlement development in Sancaktepe district, Istanbul, Turkey. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(2), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foley, J., DeFries, R., Asner, G., Barford, C., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forbes (2014). America’s fastest growing cities. Accessed September 2014 from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganbrennan/2013/01/23/americas-fastest-growing-cities/
  22. Fotheringham, A., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Gottdiener, M., & Hutchison, R. (2011). The new urban sociology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grimm, N., Faeth, S., Golubiewski, N., Redman, C., et al. (2008). Global change and ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herold, M., Couclelis, H., & Clarke, K. (2005). The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 369–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, Z., & Lo, C. (2007). Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31(6), 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Irwin, E., & Bockstael, N. (2007). The evolution of urban sprawl: Evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. PNAS, 104(52), 20672–20677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplan, D., Wheeler, J., & Holloway, S. (2008). Urban Geography. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Li, X., & Liu, X. (2007). Defining agents' behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 1063–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, C., Li, J., & Wu, J. (2013a). Quantifying the speed, growth modes, and landscape pattern changes of urbanization: A hierarchical patch dynamics approach. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1875–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, X., Zhou, W., & Ouyang, Z. (2013b). Forty years of urban expansion in Beijing: What is the relative importance of physical, socioeconomic, and neighborhood factors? Applied Geography, 38, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liao, F., & Wei, Y. (2014). Modeling determinants of urban growth in Dongguan, China: A spatial logistic approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28, 801–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long, Y., Gu, Y., & Han, H. (2012). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: Evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(2–4), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luo, J., & Wei, Y. (2009). Modeling spatial variations of urban growth patterns in Chinese cities: The case of Nanjing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall, A. (2001). How cities work: Suburbs, sprawl and the roads not taken. Austin: UT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Muller, K., Steinmeier, C., & Kuchler, M. (2010). Urban growth along motorways in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakaya, T. (2014). GWLR user manual: Windows application for geographically weighted regression modeling. Bulletin from the Department of Geography, Ritsumeikan University, Japan. Accessed December 10, 2015 from: https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Windows+Application+for+Geographically
  38. NLCD (National Land Cover Database) (2014). Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium’s national land cover database. Accessed September 24 from: http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php.
  39. O’Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliveira, S., Pereira, J., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., & Lourenco, L. (2014). Exploring the spatial patterns of fire density in Southern Europe using geographically weighted regression. Applied Geography, 51, 143–157.Google Scholar
  41. Pacione, M. (2009). Urban Geography: A global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Pickett, S., Cadenasso, M., Grove, J., Nilon, C., Pouyat, R., & Zipperer, W. (2001). Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 32, 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pijanowski, B., Brown, D., Schellito, B., & Manik, G. (2002). Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A land transformation model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Portugali, J. (2000). Self-organization and the City. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reilly, M., O’Mara, M., & Seto, K. (2009). From Bangalore to the bay area: Comparing transportation and activity accessibility as drivers of urban growth. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riera, J., Voss, P., Carpenter, S., et al. (2001). Nature, society and history in two contrasting landscapes in Wisconsin, USA: Interactions between lakes and humans during the twentieth century. Land Use Policy, 18, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seto, K.C., Fragkias, M., Guneralp, B., & Reilly, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion, PloS One, 6(8), e23777.doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0023777.
  48. Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., & Helbich, M. (2015). Spatiotemporal variability of urban growth factors: A global and local perspective on the megacity of Mumbai. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorense, A., Marcotullio, P., & Grant, J.(2004). Towards sustainable cities: East Asian, north American, and European perspectives on managing urban regions. Ashgate Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
  50. Thapa, R., & Murayama, Y. (2010). Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Geography, 30(1), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tian, G., Ouyang, Y., Quan, Q., & Wu, J. (2011). Simulating spatiotemporal dynamics of urbanization with multi-agent systems – A case study of the phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Ecological Modeling, 222, 1129–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. US Census (United States Census Bureau). (2014). State and County Quick Facts. Obtained September 24, 2014 from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/16000.html.
  53. Verburg, P., van Eck, J., de Nijs, T., Dijst, M., & Schot, P. (2004). Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 31, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu, J., & David, J. (2002). A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: Theory and applications. Ecological Modeling, 153, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu, J., & Loucks, O. (1995). From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70(4), 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu, J., Jenerette, G., Buyantuyev, A., & Redman, C. (2011). Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: The case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecological Complexity, 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu, C., Liu, M., Zhang, C., An, S., Yu, W., & Chen, J. (2007). The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecology, 22, 925–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu, C., Liu, M., Hong, C., Chi, T., An, S., & Yang, X. (2012). Temporal variation of characteristic scales in urban landscapes: An insight into the evolving internal structures of China’s two largest cities. Landscape Ecology, 27, 1063–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang, Z., Su, S., Xiao, R., Jiang, D., & Wu, J. (2013a). Identifying determinants of urban growth form a multi-scale perspective: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China. Applied Geography, 45, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang, C., Wu, J., Grimm, N., McHale, M., & Buyantuyev, A. (2013b). A hierarchical patch mosaic ecosystem model for urban landscapes: Model development and evaluation. Ecological Modeling, 250, 81–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang, Q., Wallace, J., Deng, X., & Seto, K. (2014). Central versus local states: Which matters more in affecting China’s urban growth? Land Use Policy, 38, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao, C., Jensen, J., & Zhan, B. (2017). A comparison of urban growth and their influencing factors of two border cities: Laredo in the US and Nuevo Laredo in Mexico. Applied Geography, 79, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Policy Research CenterBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations