Quantifying the Spatiotemporal Trends of Urban Sprawl Among Large U.S. Metropolitan Areas Via Spatial Metrics
- 557 Downloads
Spatial metrics have emerged as a widely utilized tool to quantify urban morphologies and monitor urban sprawl. Since previous applications of spatial metrics have typically considered only a single urban class, this study evaluates how deriving spatial metrics from multiple land use/land cover (LULC) classification schemes can help elucidate the spatiotemporal trends of urban sprawl. Specifically, the urban morphologies of the fifty most populous metropolitan areas in the U.S. were quantified in 2001 and 2011 using spatial metrics derived from two LULC classification schemes: the more common urban/non-urban binary and a non-binary that considered four urban classes individually. The results indicated that many of the spatial metrics were significantly correlated with existing sprawl indices, suggesting that they accurately quantified components of urban form associated with urban sprawl. More sprawl-like morphologies were typically located in the Eastern region of the U.S. although the regional variability of select spatial metrics was dependent on the LULC classification scheme. Over the 10-year study period, spatial metric-based sprawl indices that compared the relative abundance of low and high intensity urban development suggested that sprawl attributable to low-density single family residential suburbs generally decreased among most metropolitan areas. However, detailed case studies revealed that sprawling development was still likely increasing within particular metros in the form of strip commercial development. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of considering multiple classification schemes to maximize the utility of spatial metrics for urban morphological analysis and urban planning.
KeywordsUrban sprawl Urban morphologies Spatial metrics Classification scheme Urban planning
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and insightful feedback that helped improve the manuscript.
- Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Barrington-Leigh, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2015). A century of sprawl in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504033112.
- Cabarrus County (2008). Cabarrus county central area plan. https://www.cabarruscounty.us/government/departments/planning-development/long-range-planning/Documents/commerce_central_area_adopted_land_use_plan.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2015.
- City of Austin (2008). Austin Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan Interim Update. http://austinnoise.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ATCP_InterimUpdate_Adopted.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2016.
- City of Raleigh (2009). The 2030 comprehensive plan for the City of Raleigh. http://www.raleighnc.gov/cp. Accessed 27 Feb 2016.
- Curran, D. (2002). Challenging the sprawl of big box retail: The smart growth approach to “zone it and they will come” development. The POLIS Project on Ecological Governance and Smart Growth, British Columbia. http://www.smartgrowth.bc.ca/Portals/0/Downloads/Challenging%20the%20Sprawl%20of%20Big%20Box%20Retail.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2016.
- EPA (2012). Growing for a sustainable future: Miami-Dade county urban development boundary assessment. Office of Sustainable Communities. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-04/documents/miami-dade_final_report_12-12-12.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2015.
- Ewing, R. (2008). Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. In J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, W. Endlicher, et al. (Eds.), Urban ecology (pp. 519–535). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2014). Sprawl 2014. Smart Growth America. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/measuring-sprawl-2014.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
- Ewing, R., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. (2002). Measuring sprawl and its impact. Smart Growth America. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/MeasuringSprawl.PDF. Accessed 28 Oct 2013.
- Fry, J. A., Xian, G., Jin, S., Dewitz, J. A., Homer, C. G., Yang, L., Barnes, C. A., Herold, N. D., & Wickham, J. D. (2011). Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 77(9), 858–864.Google Scholar
- Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., & Ene, E. (2012). FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2012.
- Muller, P. O. (2004). Transportation and urban form: stages in the spatial evolution of the American metropolis. In S. Hanson & G. Giuliano (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (pp. 59–85). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Nelson, A. C., & Sanchez, T. W. (2005). The effectiveness of urban containment regimes in reducing exurban sprawl. DISP, 160, 42–47.Google Scholar
- Rhode Island Division of Planning (2006). Land use 2025: Rhode Island state land use polices and plan executive summary. M. A. Cox (Ed.). Narragansett: Rhode Island Sea Grant.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2012). Large metropolitan statistical areas – Population: 1990 to 2010. Statistical Abstract of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2011/compendia/statab/131ed/tables/pop.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2015.