Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 309–327 | Cite as

Understanding Accessibility to Snap-Accepting Food Store Locations: Disentangling the Roles of Transportation and Socioeconomic Status

Article

Abstract

Research suggests that spatial inaccessibility to food stores adversely affects the health status of individuals living in predominantly low income or racial minority geographic areas. Previous studies examining geographic accessibility to food stores have focused on defining ‘food deserts’ using a variety of methods to map and quantify inaccessibility. However, the ability to afford and purchase healthy food must also be considered, and a scan of recent research reveals few studies that have accounted for the role of government assistance programs and how this might impact people’s accessibility. In this paper, we analyze specific at-risk populations’ accessibility to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) accepting locations using GIS-based estimates of specific personal transportation costs. In the U.S., the SNAP program attempts to alleviate food insecurity among low-income groups who qualify for assistance. We focus on understanding the relative accessibility of potentially vulnerable demographic populations as captured at the Census block group level and their potential ability to reach SNAP accepting food store locations. A mid-sized city in Florida is used as a test case. Network-based approaches are employed using GIS to gauge accessibility in terms of walking, automobile, and public transit modes. Ultimately, we seek to better understand possible differences in accessibility across socioeconomic groups, emphasizing characteristics such as vehicle ownership, race, and income, while recognizing the importance of the SNAP program. Findings suggest that higher income, high vehicle access, and white populations are more accessible to food opportunities than lower income, low vehicle access, and African American populations and potential policy implications of this work include whether certain transportation costs should be subsidized for individuals receiving SNAP benefits.

Keywords

Food deserts Food environments Accessibility Health Transportation 

References

  1. Andrews, M., Nord, M., Bickel, G., Carlson, S. (1999). Household food security in the United States, 1999. Economic Research Service / USDA.Google Scholar
  2. Apparicio, P., Cloutier, M. S., & Shearmur, R. (2007). The case of Montréal’s missing food deserts: evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6(4), 4. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17295912.
  3. Baker, E., & Schootman, M. (2006). The Role of Race and Poverty in Access to Foods That Enable Individuals to Adhere to Dietary Guidelines. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/pmc/articles/PMC1636719.
  4. Bonanno, A., & Ghosh, G. (2010). SNAP efficacy and food access – a nationwide spatial analysis. The Economics of Food, Food Choice, and Health.Google Scholar
  5. Cervero, R., Rood, T., & Appleyard, B. (1999). Tracking accessibility: employment and housing opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 31(7), 1259–1278. Retrieved from http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a311259.
  6. Chang, V. W. (2006). Racial residential segregation and weight status among US adults. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 63(5), 1289–303. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, S., & Macintyre, S. (2002). “Food deserts”--evidence and assumption in health policy making. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 325(7361), 436–8. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1123946&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  8. Gatrell, J. D., Reid, N., & Ross, P. (2011). Local food systems, deserts, and maps: the spatial dynamics and policy implications of food geography. Applied Geography, 31(4), 1195–1196. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Handy, H. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility:an exploration of issues and alternatives. Retrieved August 02, 2012, from http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a291175.
  10. Horner, M., & Mefford, J. (2005). Examining the spatial and social variation in employment accessibility: a case study of bus transit in Austin, Texas. In: Levinson, D. M. & Krizek, K. (Eds.). Access to Destinations. Kidlington Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/view.aspx?id=781599.
  11. Jiao, J., Moudon, A. V., Ulmer, J., Hurvitz, P. M., & Drewnowski, A. (2012). How to identify food deserts: measuring physical and economic access to supermarkets in King County, Washington. American Journal of Public Health, 102(10), e32–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kent, J. L. (2014). Driving to save time or saving time to drive ? The enduring appeal of the private car. Transportation Research Part A, 65, 103–115. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.009.Google Scholar
  13. Kwan, M. (1998). Accessibility : a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(9512451).Google Scholar
  14. Larsen, K., & Gilliland, J. (2008). Mapping the evolution of “food deserts” in a Canadian city: Supermarket accessibility in London, Ontario, 1961–2005. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(16), 16. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18423005
  15. Mcallister, D. M. (1976). Equity and efficiency in public facility location. Geographical Analysis, 8.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, H. (2007). Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass, 1(3), 503–535. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00025.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morrill, R. L., & Symons, J. (1977). Efficiency and equity aspects of optimum location. Geographical Analysis, IX(July).Google Scholar
  18. Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: a case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6(4), 201–219. doi:10.1080/13606710110084651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nord, M., Golla, A. M., & Service, U. S. D. of A. E. R. (2009). Does SNAP decrease food insecurity?: untangling the self-selection effect (Google eBook) (p. 2). DIANE publishing. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=byHIYMgtQ0YC&pgis=1.
  20. O’Kelly, M. E., & Horner, M. W. (2003). Aggregate accessibility to population at the county level: U.S. 1940–2000. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s101090300101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohls, J., & Ponza, M. (1999). Food stamp participants’ access to food retailers. U. S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http://origin.www.fns.usda.gov/ORA/menu/Published/SNAP/FILES/ProgramOperations/retailer.pdf.
  22. Pathania, V. (2009). The effect of fast food restaurants on obesity. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (Vol. No. 14721). Citeseer. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14721.
  23. PCensus 9.1 for ArcView. (2009). Tetrad Computer Applications, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Pearce, J., Witten, K., & Bartie, P. (2006). Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(5), 389–95. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.043281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rigby, S., Leone, A. F., Kim, H., Betterley, C., Johnson, M. A., Kurtz, H., & Lee, J. S. (2012). Food Deserts in Leon County, FL: disparate distribution of supplemental nutrition assistance program-accepting stores by neighborhood characteristics. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.007.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, D., & Richards, R. (2004). Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US food stamp program. Public Health Nutrition, 7(8), 1081–8. doi:10.1079/PHN2004648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose, D., Bodor, N., & Swalm, C. (2009). Deserts in New Orleans? Illustrations of urban food access and implications for policy. University of Michigan National Poverty Center/ USDA Economic Research Service Research, (February), 1–30. Retrieved from http://npc.fordschool.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/rose_et_al.pdf.
  28. Short, A., Guthman, J., & Raskin, S. (2007). Food deserts, oases, or mirages?: small markets and community food security in the San Francisco bay area. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3), 352–364. doi:10.1177/0739456X06297795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, D. M., Cummins, S., Taylor, M., Dawson, J., Marshall, D., Sparks, L., & Anderson, A. S. (2010). Neighbourhood food environment and area deprivation: spatial accessibility to grocery stores selling fresh fruit and vegetables in urban and rural settings. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(1), 277–84. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4), 595–613. Retrieved from http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a300595.
  31. United State Department of Agriculture (USDA). Food and Nutrition Service. (2012). Building a healthy America: a profile of the supplemental nutrition assistance program.Google Scholar
  32. United State Department of Agriculture (USDA). Food and Nutrition Service. (2013). SNAP retailer locater.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, R. E., Keane, C. R., & Burke, J. G. (2010). Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: a review of food deserts literature. Health & Place, 16(5), 876–84. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White, M. (2007). Food access and obesity. Science, 8(30), 99–107.Google Scholar
  35. Zenk, S. N., Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., James, S. A., Bao, S., & Wilson, M. L. (2005). Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. American Journal of Public Health, 95(4), 660–7. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.042150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations