Measuring the Effects of a Land Value Tax on Land Development
- 390 Downloads
The objective of this research was to evaluate using land value tax as a potential policy tool to moderate sprawling development in Nashville, TN, the nation’s most sprawling metropolitan community with a population of one million or more. A land development model was used to evaluate the hypothesis that a land value tax encourages more development closer to areas of preexisting development than does the observed property tax scheme. For the median and lower and upper quartiles of empirical densities, results show that distances are shorter between areas of preexisting development and parcels predicted to be developed under a hypothetical land value tax policy than distances predicted under the observed tax scheme. This finding suggests that land value taxation could be used to design compact development strategies in Nashville, TN.
KeywordsCompact development Land value tax Land development model Spatial-probit model Urban Sprawl
Cho, Kim, and Roberts are, respectively, assistant professors, graduate research assistant, and professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the University of Tennessee.
- Alexander, M. (2004). The “Creative Class” and economic development: An analysis of workforce attraction and retention in the Atlanta Region. http://www.cherry.gatech.edu/refs/student/AlexanderFinalPaper2004.pdf
- Anselin, L. (2004). GeoDa™ 0.9.5-i release notes. Urbana: Spatial Analysis Laboratory and Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
- Bills, N. L. & Boisvert, R. N. (1987). New York's experience in farmland retention through agricultural districts and use-value assessment, Soil and Water Conservation Society, 231–250.Google Scholar
- Bockstael, N., & Bell, K. (1998). Land use patterns and water quality: the effect of differential land management controls. In R. Just & S. Netanyahu (Eds.), International water and resource economics consortium, conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources. Dordrecht: Kluwater Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Brookings Institute. (2000). Moving beyond sprawl: The challenge for metropolitan Atlanta. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. http://www.brookings.edu/urban.
- Brueckner, J. K. (1986). A modern analysis of the effects of site value taxation. National Tax Journal, 39, 49–58.Google Scholar
- Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In W. G. Gale & J. R. Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs (pp. 65–89). Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 327–335.Google Scholar
- Cho, S., Lambert, D. M., & Roberts, R. K. (2010). Forecasting open space with a two-rate property yax. Land Economics, 86.Google Scholar
- Coughlin, C. C., Garrett, T. A., & Hernández-Murillo, R. (2003). Spatial probit and the geographic patterns of State Lotteries. St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Working Paper 2003-042B. http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-042.pdf.
- Cumberland Commercial Partners. (2009). Nashville development. http://www.cumberlandcommercial.com/nashville-development.php.
- Daniels, T., & Bowers, D. (1997). Holding our ground. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
- Dixler, A. O. (2006). Direct taxes under the constitution: a review of the precedents. Taxanalysts.Google Scholar
- ESRI. (2004). ESRI data & maps 2004. http://www.esri.com/data/data-maps/.
- Fisher, G. W. (1997). The evolution of the American property tax. In R.T. Golembiewski & J. Rabin (Eds.), Public budgeting and finance. Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
- Franzese Jr. R. J., & Hays, J. C. (2004). Modeling international diffusion: Inferential benefits and methodological challenges, with an application to international tax competition. WZB Papers, SP II 2004-12.Google Scholar
- GeoDa Center. (2009). GeoDa. http://geodacenter.asu.edu/.
- Hanham, R., & Spiker, J. S. (2005). Urban sprawl detection using satellite imagery and geographically weighted regression. In R. Jensen, J. Gatrell & D. McLean (Eds.), Geo-spatial technologies in urban economics. Berlinthebe: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hannan, E. J., & Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 41, 190–195.Google Scholar
- Hylton, T. (2004). The walking life. http://www.saveourlandsaveourtowns.org/parkandwalk.html.
- Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., & Geoghegan, J. (2003). Modeling and managing urban growth at the rural–urban fringe: a parcel-level model of residential land use change. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 83–102.Google Scholar
- Irwin, E. G., Bell, K. P., & Geoghegan, J. (2006). Forecasting residential land use change. In R. J. Johnston & S. K. Swallow (Eds.), Economics and contemporary land use policy: development and conservation at the urban-rural fringe. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future Press.Google Scholar
- Katz, B. (2002). Smart growth: The future of the American metropolis? Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion London School of Economics. CASEpaper 58.Google Scholar
- Lacombe, D. J., & Shaughnessy, T. M. (2005). An examination of a congressional vote using Bayesian spatial probit techniques. Paper presented at the 2005 Meetings of the Public Choice Society.Google Scholar
- Mills, E. S. (1998). The economic consequences of a land tax. In D. Netzer (Ed.), Land value taxation: Could it work today? Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
- MPD (2009). Metro Planning Department, Davidson County. http://www.nashville.gov/mpc/.
- Mukherjee, B., & Singer, D. A. (2007). Monetary institutions, partisanship, and inflation targeting. International Organization, 62(2), 323–358.Google Scholar
- Nasser, H. E., & Overberg, P. (2001). A comprehensive look at sprawl in America. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/sprawl/main.htm.
- Nechyba, T. J. (1998). Replacing capital taxes with land taxes: efficiency and distributional implications with an application to the United States economy. In D. Netzer (Ed.), Land value taxation: Could it work today? Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
- Nelson, A. C., & Sanchez, T. W. (2005). The effectiveness of urban containment regimes in reducing exurban sprawl. DISP, 160, 42–47.Google Scholar
- Netusil, N. R. (2005). The effect of environmental zoning and amenities on property values: Portland. Oregon Land Economics, 81(2), 227–246.Google Scholar
- Novo, A. (2003). Contagious currency crises: A spatial probit approach. Working Paper: http://www.bportugal.pt/publish/wp/2003-5.pdf.
- Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). The impact of urban land taxation: the Pittsburgh experience. National Tax Journal, 50(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Princeton Survey Research Associates. (2000). Research—straight talk from Americans—2000. National Survey for the Pew Center for Civic Journalism. http://www.pewcenter.org/doingcj/research/r_ST2000nat1.html#sprawl.
- Richardson, J. J., Jr., Gough, Z. M., & Puentes, R. (2003). Is home rule the answer?: Clarifing the influence of Dillon’s rule on growth management. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.Google Scholar
- Schoettle, F. P. (2003). What public finance do State Constitutions allow? In S. B. White, R. D. Bingham & E. W. Hill (Eds.), Financing economic development in the 21st century. ME: Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Schofield, N., Miller, G., & Martin, A. (2003). Critical elections and political realignments in the USA: 1860–2000. Political Studies, 51(2), 217–240.Google Scholar
- Shao, J. (1997). An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Statistica Sinica, 7, 221–264. http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/statistica/oldpdf/A7n21.pdf.
- Shinkai, K., Kanagawa, S., Takizawa, T., & Yamashita, H. (2008). Decision analysis of fuzzy partition tree applying AIC and fuzzy decision. In I. Lovrek, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.), KES 2008, Part III, LNAI 5179 (pp. 572–579). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S. (1956). Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test. In S. Siegel (Ed.), Nonparameteric statistics for the behavioral sciences (pp. 127–136). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd.Google Scholar
- Sierra Club. (2009). Stop sprawl. A complex relationship: population growth and suburban sprawl. http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/population.asp.
- Smart Growth America. (2000). Americans want growth and green; demand solutions to traffic, haphazard development. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/newsroom/pressrelease101600.html.
- Smart Growth America. (2003). Measuring sprawl and its impact: The character & consequences of metropolitan expansion. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/sprawlindex/sprawlexecsum.html.
- Smith, T. E., & LeSage, J. P. (2000). A Bayesian probit model with spatial dependencies. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Snyder, K., & Bird, L. (1998). Paying the costs of sprawl: Using fair-share costing to control sprawl. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Southeast Watershed Forum. (2001). Growing smarter: Linking land use & water quality. Newsletter 4. http://www.southeastwaterforum.org/pdf/newsletters/SEWF_Spring2001.pdf.
- Turnbull, G. K., & Geon, G. (2004). Local Government internal structure, external constraints, and the median voter hypothesis. Georgia State University. Working paper.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2000). The state of the cities 2000.Google Scholar
- Walls, M., & McConnell, V. (2004). Incentive-based land use policies and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. Discussion paper 04-20. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-04-20.pdf.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT.Google Scholar