Advertisement

The state of the art and future directions of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery

  • Rebecca Maria Shulman
  • Abbas El-Sayed AbbasEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been widely adopted in early-stage lung cancer as an oncologically sound and minimally invasive approach with certain proven short-term advantages over open thoracotomy especially in terms of postoperative morbidity. Nevertheless, VATS is associated with visual and mechanical limitations, many of which were overcome with the introduction of robotic surgical techniques. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) can approximate the visual perspective of open surgery, while utilizing instruments that mimic the maneuverability of the human wrist and provide magnified three-dimensional imaging. The added cost in addition to the effort required of surgeons to master RATS may be ultimately compensated by enhanced surgical efficiency, access to rapidly developing technical innovations, and the potential for improved patient outcomes.

Keywords

State of the art Future directions Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Shulman, Rebecca Maria declares that she has no conflict of interest.

The author, Abbas E. Abbas, MD, is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Neither entity was involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

No consent needed for a review article.

References

  1. 1.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:421–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:419–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:366–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Higuchi M, Yaginuma H, Yonechi A, et al. Long-term outcomes after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy versus lobectomy via open thoracotomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2553–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang CJ, Kumar A, Klapper JA, et al. A national analysis of long-term survival following thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002342.
  7. 7.
    Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G. Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:397–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palade E, Passlick B, Osei-Agyemang T, Gunter J, Wiesemann S. Video-assisted vs open mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:244–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abbas AE. New nomenclature for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery also gets rid of RATS. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:1070–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD. A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:3–10.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, Hang F, Cao S, Cao Y. Video-Assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy for lung cancer: description of a learning curve. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:696–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonfiotti A, Bongiolatti S, Borgianni S, et al. Development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy program in a single institution: results before and after completion of the learning curve. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, Gaissert HA, Harpole DH, Wright CD. Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:247–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferguson MK. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:235–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:864–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:740–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veronesi G. Robotic thoracic surgery: technical considerations and learning curve for pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24:135–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilson JL, Louie BE, Cerfolio RJ, et al. The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1901–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:383–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Darr C, Cheufou D, Weinreich G, Hachenberg T, Aigner C, Kampe S. Robotic thoracic surgery results in shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative pain compared to open thoracotomy: a matched pairs analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4126–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Vallieres E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1598–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park BJ, Flores RM. Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:297–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swanson SJ, Miller DL, McKenna RJ Jr, et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:929–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deen SA, Wilson JL, Wilshire CL, et al. Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1000–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bess KM, Wei B, Minnich DJ. Incidence, results, and our current intraoperative technique to control major vascular injuries during minimally invasive robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:394–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer M, Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, Strother E, Christenson D. The learning curve of robotic lobectomy. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:448–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farivar BS, Flannagan M, Leitman IM. General surgery residents’ perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:235–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF. Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;23:36–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin MW, Kuo SW, Yang SM, Lee JM. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:1747–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K, Fujioka S, Matsuoka Y, Kubouchi Y. A successful case of robotic bronchoplastic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19:478–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abbas A, Kadakia S, Ambur V, Muro K, Kaiser L. Intraoperative electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopic localization of small, deep, or subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1581–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Thoracic Medicine and SurgeryLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Health SystemPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations