Advertisement

Residential retrofits at scale: opportunity identification, saving estimation, and personalized messaging based on communicating thermostat data

  • Michael ZeifmanEmail author
  • Amine Lazrak
  • Kurt Roth
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Basic insulation and heating system retrofits of existing homes could achieve annual energy savings of up to $4–5 billion in the USA. However, current US utility energy efficiency (EE) programs are costly and challenging to scale. Customer acquisition occurs primarily through energy bill mailers, mass media, and on-line advertising that lack specificity about particular home retrofit opportunities, expected energy savings, and cost-effectiveness. Specific retrofit opportunities are identified via on-site home energy assessments that can be inconvenient to homeowners, expensive, and of variable accuracy. Our paper discusses using communicating thermostat data to significantly increase the customer uptake of energy conservation measures (ECMs) by identifying homes with the most significant retrofit opportunities, estimating post-retrofit energy savings, and formulating home-specific outreach. We extended our previously developed gray-box building model to identify physical building parameters corresponding to the target retrofit opportunities, i.e., whole-home R value, air leakage characteristics, and heating system efficiency. The estimated R values and air leakage characteristics compare favorably with the ground truth. The validated algorithms can calculate home-specific energy savings estimate for each ECM, and the algorithm outputs can be used by utility EE programs to formulate home-specific retrofit offers.

Keywords

Communicating thermostat Gray-box model Estimation Building thermal property R value ACH50 Home energy assessment Energy audit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy Building America Program under Contract #DE-EE 0007571. We would like to extend our gratitude to Eric Werling, Director, and to Lena Burkett, Technical Research Manager of Building America Program for their support and fruitful discussions.

We would like to thank our utility partners for their relentless work on data retrieval, cleaning and anonymizing, and for their patient and persistent work with the CT and HEA vendors. In particular, we thank Brian Greenfield, Peter Klint, and Peter Kuhn of Eversource and Brenda Pike, Cassandra Vickers, and Rick Wester of National Grid.

Finally, we thank Dr. Iain Walker, of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, for helpful discussions about modeling infiltration, and Bryan Urban and Duncan Howes for meaningful discussions and data processing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

References

  1. Afram, A., & Janabi-Sharifi, F. (2015). Gray-box modeling and validation of residential HVAC system for control system design. Applied Energy, 137, 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacher, P., & Madsen, H. (2011). Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43, 1511–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belussi, L., Danza, L., Ghellere, M., Guazzi, G., & Meroni, I. (2017). Estimating of building energy performance for local energy policy at urban scale. In CISBAT 2017 International Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland. Energy Procedia, 122, 98–103.Google Scholar
  4. Berthou T. (2013). Developpement de models de batiment pour la prevision de charge de climatisation et l’elaboration de strategies d’optimisation energetique et d’efacement. [Ph.D. thesis]. Ecole Nationale Supeure des Mines de Paris.Google Scholar
  5. BPI (2012). “Technical standards for the building analyst professional.” Building Performance Institute Standard.Google Scholar
  6. Brems, A., Chirez, S., Papadamou, A., and Steele, E (2015). “A study on energy efficiency in enterprises: energy audits and energy management systems.” Report to European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Chong, H. and George, A.. (2018). “Buildings and behavior: rebounds effects and other inconvenient findings in residential energy consumption and building shell performance”. Working Paper. Dated 8/29/2016.Google Scholar
  8. DOE/EIA. (2009). “Annual Energy Outlook 2009”. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Accessed on 3/15/18: www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo09/
  9. DOE/EIA. (2018). Annual Energy Outlook 2018: Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption. U.S: Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration Accessed on 3/15/18 from: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/.Google Scholar
  10. Fels, M. (1986). PRISM: an introduction. Energy and Buildings, 9, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldman, E., et al. (2014). “Are thermostats the new energy audits?” available at https://www.efficiencyvermont.com/Media/Default/docs/white-papers/
  12. Goldman, E., et al. (2018). “Free X-ray specs—just send in your smart thermostat data for an automated peek inside your home’s envelope!” In: Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Pacific Grove: ACEEE, pp. 12.1-12.12.Google Scholar
  13. Hallinan, K. P., et al. (2011). Targeting Residential energy reduction for city utilities using historical electrical utility data and readily available building data. ASHRAE Transactions, 117, 577.Google Scholar
  14. Harish, V. S. K. V and Kumar, A.. (2016). “Reduced order modeling and parameter identification of a building energy system model through an optimization routine.” Applied Energy, 162, 1010–1023.Google Scholar
  15. Home Energy Services. (2018). Massachusetts program encouraging retrofits and offering subsidized communicating thermostats. https://www.masssave.com/en/saving/energy-assessments
  16. Huang, J., Hanford, J., and Yang, F. (1999). Residential heating and cooling loads component analysis. LBNL paper 44636.Google Scholar
  17. IEA (2019) “Energy audits in Korea”, International Energy Agency. Accessed on 2/13/2019 at https://www.iea.org/policiesandmeasures/pams/korea/name-22257-en.php
  18. Klint, P. (2018). Private communication on Eversource Residential Program.Google Scholar
  19. Krigger, J. and Dorsi, C. (2004). Residential energy cost savings & comfort for existing buildings 4th Edition, p. 284.Google Scholar
  20. Lazrak, A., & Zeifman, M. (2017). Estimation of physical buildings parameters using interval thermostat data. In ACM BuildSys’17, 4, Deflt, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, S. H., & Hong, T. (2017). Leveraging zone air temperature data to improve physics-based energy simulation of existing buildings. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: 15th IBPSA Conference.Google Scholar
  22. Lin, Y., Middelkoop, T., and Barooah, P. (2012). “Issues in identification of control-oriented thermal models of zones in multi-zone buildings.” 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, proceedings.Google Scholar
  23. Ljung, L. (2017). System identification Toolbox™ user’s guide. Natick: The MathWorks, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Massachusetts DPU (2016). “2016-2018 energy efficiency plan order”. Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. January. Accessed on 3/15/2018 from: http://ma-eeac.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016-2018-Energy-Efficiency-Three-Year-Plan-Order.pdf
  25. Mejri, et al. (2011). Energy performance assessment of occupied buildings using model identification techniques. Energy and Buildings, 43, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newsham, G. et al. (2017). “Remote energy auditing: energy efficiency through smart thermostat data and control.” In ECEEE Summer Study proceedings.Google Scholar
  27. Opinion Dynamics Corporation (2009). “Massachusetts residential appliance saturation survey (Rass): volume 1: summary results and analysis”. Final Report. April.Google Scholar
  28. Parks Associates (2017). “Parks Associates: More than 100 million U.S. households do not have a smart home device”. Press release. Accessed on 3/15/2018 from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/parks-associates-more-than-100-million-us-households-do-not-have-a-smart-home-device-300450441.html
  29. Peeters, L., et al. (2008). Control of heating systems in residential buildings: current practice. Energy and Buildings, 40, 1446–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. S3C (2019) “Energy audits for households.” Guidelines by S3C. Accessed on 2/13/2019 from: https://www.smartgrid-engagement-toolkit.eu/learning/list-of-guidelines-and-tools/
  31. Siemann, M. J. (2013). “Performance and applications of residential building energy grey-box models.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, I. (2017). Private Communication.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, I.S. and Wilson, D. J. (1990) “The Alberta air infiltration model (AIM-2)”. Alberta University.Google Scholar
  34. Younes, C. (2012). “Developing an enhanced model for combined heat and air infiltration energy simulation.” Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  35. Zeifman, M. and Roth, K. (2016). “Residential remote audits: estimation of building thermal parameters using interval energy consumption data.” In: Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Pacific Grove: ACEEE, pp. 12.1-12.12.Google Scholar
  36. Zeifman, M., Roth, K., and Urban, B.. (2017). “Communicating thermostats as a tool for home energy performance assessment.” In: Proceedings of 35th IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics. Las Vegas: IEEE, 191-192.Google Scholar
  37. Zeifman, M., A. Lazrak, and Roth, K. (2018). “Residential retrofits at scale: opportunity identification, saving estimation and personalized messaging based on communicating thermostat data.” In: Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Pacific Grove: ACEEE, pp. 12.1-12.13.Google Scholar
  38. Zhu, X., Bai, Q., and Zhang, X. (2017) “Good practice and success stories on energy efficiency in China.” Report to Copenhagen Centre on Energy Efficiency.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer USA Center for Manufacturing Innovation CMIBrooklineUSA

Personalised recommendations