Building analytics and monitoring-based commissioning: industry practice, costs, and savings

  • Hannah KramerEmail author
  • Guanjing Lin
  • Claire Curtin
  • Eliot Crowe
  • Jessica Granderson
Original Article


As building energy and system-level monitoring becomes more common, facility teams are faced with an overwhelming amount of data. This data does not typically lead to insights, corrective actions, and energy savings unless it is stored, organized, analyzed, and prioritized in automated ways. The Smart Energy Analytics Campaign is a public-private sector partnership program focused on supporting commercially available energy management and information systems (EMIS) technology use and monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx) practices. MBCx is an ongoing commissioning process with focus on analyzing large amounts of data on a continuous basis. EMIS tools are used in the MBCx process to organize, present, visualize, and analyze the data. With campaign data from over 400 million square feet (sq. ft.) of installed space, this paper presents the results achieved by owners that are implementing EMIS, along with associated technology costs. The study’s EMIS users that reported savings achieved the median cost savings of $0.19/sq. ft. and 7% annually, with savings shown to increase over time. For 35 portfolio owners, the median base cost to install an EMIS was $0.03/sq. ft., with an annual recurring software cost of $0.02/sq. ft. and an estimated annual labor cost of $0.03/sq. ft. Two types of EMIS systems—energy information systems and fault detection and diagnostic systems—are defined in the body of the paper. Of the two, we find that fault detection and diagnostic systems have both higher savings and higher costs. The paper offers a characterization of EMIS products, MBCx services, and trends in the industry.


EMIS Fault detection and diagnostics Energy information system Energy management Building energy monitoring 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. ASHRAE (2013). ASHRAE standard 202-2013. Commissioning process for buildings and systems. American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  2. Building Commissioning Association (2018). The Building Commissioning Association best practices in commissioning existing buildings. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
  3. Fernandes, S., Granderson, J., Singla, R., & Touzani, S. (2018). Corporate delivery of a global smart buildings program. Energy Engineering Jan 1;115(1):7–25.Google Scholar
  4. Fernandez, N., et al. (2017). Impacts on commercial building controls on energy savings and peak load reduction. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. PNNL Report Number PNNL-25985.Google Scholar
  5. Granderson, J., & Lin, G. (2016). Building energy information systems: synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1369–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Granderson, J., Singla, R., Mayhorn, E., Erlich, P., Vrabie, D., & Frank, S. (2017). Characteristics and survey of automated fault detection and diagnostic tools. LBNL-2001075.Google Scholar
  7. Granderson, J., Lin, G., & Fernandes, S. (2015). A primer on organizational use of EMIS. Prepared for the U.S. DOE Better Buildings Program.Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, P., & Waltner, M. (2013). Real-time Energy management: a case study of three large commercial buildings in Washington, D.C. Natural Resources Defense Council. October. CS:13-07-A.Google Scholar
  9. Katipamula, S., & Brambley, M. (2005). Methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics for building systems – a review, part 1. HVAC&R Research, 11(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer, H., Lin, G., Granderson, J., Curtin, C., & Crowe, E. (2018). Moving beyond data paralysis to effective use of building analytics. Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study.Google Scholar
  11. Mills, E., & Mathew, P. (2009). Monitoring based commissioning: benchmarking analysis of 24 UC/CSU/IOU projects. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-1972E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roth, K. W., Westphalen, D., Feng, M. Y., Llana, P., & Quartararo, L. (2005). Energy impact of commercial building controls and performance diagnostics: market characterization, energy impact of building faults and energy savings potential. Report prepared by TIAX LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  13. Smart Energy Analytics Campaign (2018). Smart energy analytics campaign. Accessed on March 15, 2018.
  14. Stum, K., & Bjornskov, D. 2017. The building commissioning handbook third edition. Published by the Building Commissioning Association and APPA. Chapter 5: Ongoing Commissioning. 169–222.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018). Electric Power Monthly. Table ES1.B. February 2018. Accessed February 14, 2019.
  16. U.S. Energy Information Administration Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). Released May 2016. Table C1.. Accessed February 14, 2019.
  17. U.S. Energy Information Administration Natural Gas. Release date 1/31/2019. Accessed February 14, 2019.

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Kramer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guanjing Lin
    • 1
  • Claire Curtin
    • 1
  • Eliot Crowe
    • 1
  • Jessica Granderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Building Technologies and Urban Systems Division, Energy Technologies AreaLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations