Advertisement

Can emission trading help to improve energy efficiency in China?

  • Hui Zhang
  • Li-Wei FanEmail author
Original Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the operation of emission trading scheme (ETS) helps to improve energy efficiency in China. Stochastic frontier analysis is used to estimate energy efficiency at province level and sector levels, and the difference-in-differences technique is applied to assess the effectiveness of emission trading. The main findings are as follows: (1) energy efficiency may be underestimated if control variables are taken no account in efficiency estimation; (2) the diversity of energy efficiency is rather high across different provinces or sectors, and (3) ETS is not as effective for energy efficiency improvement as supposed, but its stimulation effect on provincial energy efficiency is prominently positive. It is suggested that it might be more appropriate to implement ETS program in industry or transport sector than in various sectors throughout the country.

Keywords

Stochastic frontier analysis Difference-in-differences Energy efficiency Emission trading scheme 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is financially supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (no. 17BGL251).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ang, B. W. (2006). Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy, 34, 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coelli, T. J. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. CPEA working papers (No. 7/96). Armidale: Department of Econometrics, University of New England.Google Scholar
  3. Cui, L. B., Fan, Y., Zhu, L., & Bi, Q. H. (2014). How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? Applied Energy, 9, 1043–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui, Q., Wei, Y.-M., & Li, Y. (2016). Exploring the impacts of the EU ETS emission limits on airline performance via the dynamic environmental DEA approach. Applied Energy, 183, 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duan, M., Pang, T., & Zhang, X. (2014). Review of carbon emissions trading pilots in China. Energy & Environment, 25, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EC (2011). Energy Efficiency Plan 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2011) 109 final.Google Scholar
  7. EC (2012). The state of the European carbon market in 2012. Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council, COM (2012) 652 final.Google Scholar
  8. Filippini, M., & Hunt, L. C. (2010). Energy demand and energy efficiency in the OECD countries: A stochastic demand frontier approach. Surrey Energy Economics Centre School of Economics Discussion Papers 32, 59–80.Google Scholar
  9. Filippini, M., & Hunt, L. C. (2015a). Measurement of energy efficiency based on economic foundations. Energy Economics, 52, s5–s16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Filippini, M., & Hunt, L. C. (2015b). Measuring persistent and transient energy efficiency in the US. Energy Efficiency, 9, 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filippini, M., Hunt, L. C., & Zorić, J. (2014). Impact of energy policy instruments on the estimated level of underlying energy efficiency in the EU residential sector. Energy Policy, 69, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh, R., & Kathuria, V. (2016). The effect of regulatory governance on efficiency of thermal power generation in India: A stochastic frontier analysis. Energy Policy, 89, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldsmith, R. W. (1951). A perpetual inventory of national wealth. National Bureau of Economic Research, 12, 5–74.Google Scholar
  14. Holt, C. A., & Shobe, W. M. (2016). Price and quantity collars for stabilizing emission allowance prices: Laboratory experiments on the EU ETS market stability reserve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 80, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hübler, M., Voigt, S., & Löschel, A. (2014). Designing an emissions trading scheme for China—An up-to-date climate policy assessment. Energy Policy, 75, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang, J., Xie, D., Ye, B., Shen, B., & Chen, Z. (2016). Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook. Applied Energy, 178, 902–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao, Z., Zhu, X., & Shi, J. (2014). Case study on initial allocation of Shanghai carbon emission trading based on Shapley value. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundgren, T., Marklund, P.-O., & Zhang, S. (2014). Energy efficiency in Swedish industry - a stochastic frontier approach. CERE Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Lundgren, T., Marklund, P.-O., & Zhang, S. (2016). Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency—Evidence from Sweden. Resource and Energy Economics, 43, 130–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meng, S., Siriwardana, M., Mcneill, J., et al. (2018). The impact of an ETS on the Australian energy sector: An integrated CGE and electricity modelling approach. Energy Economics, 69, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mo, J.-L., Agnolucci, P., Jiang, M.-R., & Fan, Y. (2016). The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) on low carbon energy (LCE) investment. Energy Policy, 89, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2016). Procrastinating reform: The impact of the market stability reserve on the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 80, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt, L. P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang, L., Wu, J., Yu, L., & Bao, Q. (2015). Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model. Energy Policy, 81, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tang, L., Shi, J., & Bao, Q. (2016). Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy, 97, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Venmans, F. M. J. (2016). The effect of allocation above emissions and price uncertainty on abatement investments under the EU ETS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang, L., Li, F., & Zhang, X. (2016). Chinese companies’ awareness and perceptions of the emissions trading scheme (ETS): Evidence from a national survey in China. Energy Policy, 98, 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ye, B., Jiang, J., Miao, L., Li, J., & Peng, Y. (2015). Innovative carbon allowance allocation policy for the Shenzhen emission trading scheme in China. Sustainability, 8, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, Y. J., Wang, A. D., & Tan, W. (2015). The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises. Energy Policy, 86, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Shi, D., Li, P., & Cai, W. (2016). Scenario-based potential effects of carbon trading in China: An integrated approach. Applied Energy, 182, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou, P., & Wang, M. (2016). Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review. Ecological Economics, 125, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Zhou, D. Q. (2012). Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: A parametric frontier approach. Applied Energy, 90, 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou, X., Fan, L. W., & Zhou, P. (2015). Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 77, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu, L., Zhang, X. B., Li, Y., Wang, X., & Guo, J. (2017). Can an emission trading scheme promote the withdrawal of outdated capacity in energy-intensive sectors? A case study on China's iron and steel industry. Energy Economics, 63, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economics and ManagementNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations