Energy Efficiency

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 363–386 | Cite as

Decarbonising transport to achieve Paris Agreement targets

  • Sudhir Gota
  • Cornie Huizenga
  • Karl PeetEmail author
  • Nikola Medimorec
  • Stefan Bakker
Research Article


Many global transport sector decarbonisation studies assert that it is difficult for the transport sector to decarbonise and to contribute its proportional share to the ambitious climate targets set by the Paris Agreement. We challenge this argument by establishing that deep decarbonisation is possible in the transport sector, through original research that is anchored in a global meta-analysis of long-term transport sector emission pathways from over 500 bottom-up modelling estimates from 81 countries, rather than relying on aggregated regional data and modelling efforts. First, we translate the aspirational 1.5-degree Celsius (1.5DS) target to an indicative 2050 transport sector emission target of 2 GtCO2, based on proportional downscaling of existing economy-wide 2DS studies to a transport-specific 1.5DS target. We then compare this with mitigation potential derived from the aggregation of bottom-up estimates for business-as-usual growth and low-carbon scenarios from individual country studies, which we aggregate at national and global levels. This analysis suggests that in the absence of additional action, transport sector emissions could outpace earlier projections and thus become a major roadblock to avoiding dangerous climate change. Yet, if countries collectively maximise efforts to implement comprehensive low-carbon measures, the sector could achieve reductions approaching a 1.5-degree scenario. Realising the full mitigation potential of transport will require balanced implementation of low-carbon mitigation policies that avoid (or reduce) the need for transport trips; promote a shift toward more efficient travel modes; and improve performance of vehicles and fuels. The chances that such a comprehensive approach is taken will increase if countries, cities and companies establish medium- to long-term commitments to transport decarbonisation and accelerate short-term implementation of market-ready low-carbon transport measures. Setting more ambitious low-carbon transport target with mid-term implementation milestones, and closely integrating these plans with sustainable development objectives, can help to spur mitigation action consistent with a 1.5DS target. To conclude, we discuss potential limitations of a transport sector-specific analysis of emission pathways, and we offer recommendations for further refining pathways for the transport sector to realise Paris Agreement targets.


Transport Climate change GHG emissions Mitigation Low-carbon scenarios 



The authors would like to thank the reviewers of an earlier draft of this paper, who include Daniel Bongardt (GIZ), Pierpaolo Cazzola (IEA), Todd Edwards (M2020), Lew Fulton (UC Davis), Marine Gorner (IEA), Wei-Shiuen Ng (ITF), Marie Venner (Venner Consulting) and Michael Zhang (Nottingham Trent University), as well as the four anonymous referees and the special issue editor.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Supplementary material

12053_2018_9671_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (959 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 958 kb)


  1. Asian Development Bank (2018). Transport DataBank. Accessed 12 February 2018.
  2. Bakker, S., Zuidgeest, M., de Coninck, H., & Huizenga, C. (2014). Transport, development and climate change mitigation: towards and integrated approach. Transp Rev: A Transnatl Transdiscipl J, 34(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bataille, C., Sayer, D., & Melton, N. (2015). Pathways to deep decarbonization in Canada. New York: SDSN, IDDRI.Google Scholar
  5. BMUB. (2016). Klimaschutzplan 2050. Klimaschutzpolitische Grundsätze und Ziele der Bundesregierung. Berlin: BMUB.Google Scholar
  6. Cames, M., Graichen, J., Siemons, A. & Cook, V. (2015). Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping. Brussels: Policy Department A for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI).Google Scholar
  7. Chase, R. (2017). Shared mobility principles for livable cities. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  8. City of Sydney (2017). Carbon neutral—climate change action. Accessed 14 September 2017.
  9. Clapp, C., Karousakis, K., Buchner, B., & Château, J. (2009). National and sectoral GHG mitigation potential: a comparison across models. OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers, No. 2009/07. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Climate Action Tracker (2016). Effect of current pledges and policies on global temperature. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
  11. Climate-KIC & IEA (2015). The global calculator. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  12. Creutzig, F. (2016). Evolving narratives of low-carbon futures in transportation. Transport Reviews, 36, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creutzig, F., Jochem, P., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Mattauch, L., van Vuuren, D. P., McCollum, D., et al. (2015). Transport: a roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science, 350(6263), 911–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, T., Röser, F., Tewari, R., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., Hagemann, M., et al. (2015). What the Paris Agreement means for global climate change mitigation. Accessed 06 April 2018.
  15. Department of Environmental Affairs (2015). The South Africa 2050 Calculator. Accessed 12 February 2018.
  16. DHL (2017). Zero Emissions by 2050: DHL announces ambitious new environmental protection target. Accessed 19 Sept 2017.
  17. Dulac, J. (2013). Global land transport infrastructure requirements: estimating road and railway infrastructure capacity and costs to 2050. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  18. Edelenbosch, O. Y., McCollum, D. L., van Vuuren, D. P., Bertram, C., Carrara, S., Daly, H., et al. (2017). Decomposing passenger transport futures: comparing results of global integrated assessment models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
  19. EEA. (2016). Transitions towards a more sustainable mobility system. EEA Report No 34/2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  20. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2016). 2050 Calculator. Accessed 11 February 2018.
  21. Figueroa, M., Fulton, L., & Tiwari, G. (2014). Avoiding, transforming, transitioning: pathways to sustainable low carbon passenger transport in developing countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fulton, L. (2017). Can we reach 100 million plug-in electric vehicles by 2050? A new GFEI report says it is possible, but will be challenging. Accessed 10 August 2017.
  23. Fulton, L., Cazolla, P., & Cuenot, F. (2009). IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3758–3768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fulton, L., Mason, J. & Merouw, D. (2017). Three revolutions in urban transport. UC Davis and ITDP. Accessed 10 October 2017.
  25. GIZ (2017). Sectoral implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): transport. Accessed 05 April 2018.
  26. Gota, S., Huizenga, C., Peet, K. & Kaar, G. (2015a). Emission reduction potential in the transport sector by 2030. PPMC. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  27. Gota, S., Huizenga, C. & Peet, K. (2015b). Analysis on national transport sector emissions 1990–2012. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
  28. Gota, S., Huizenga, C., Peet, K., & Kaar, G. (2016a). Nationally-determined contributions (NDCs) offer opportunities for ambitious action on transport and climate change. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
  29. Gota, S., Huizenga, C. & Peet, K. (2016b). Implications of 2DS and 1.5DS for land transport carbon emissions in 2050. Acessed 20 October 2017.
  30. Gota, S., Huizenga, C., Peet, K. & Medimorec, N. (2017). E-mobility overview. Accessed 21 October 2017.
  31. Greenpeace. (2010). Energy [R]evolution 2010: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.Google Scholar
  32. Hannappel, B. (2017). GoGreen—mission 2050: zero emissions. Presentation at Climate Action in Transport Conference, TCC Week in Berlin, 19 September 2017. Accessed 03 April 2018.
  33. Hoen, A., Geurs, K., Wilde, H. d., Hanschke, C., & Uyterlinde, M. (2009). CO 2 emission reduction in transport: confronting medium-term and long-term options. Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google Scholar
  34. Hong, S., Chung, Y., Kim, J., & Chun, D. (2016). Analysis on the level of contribution to the national greenhouse gas reduction target in Korean transportation sector using LEAP model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ICCT. (2012). Global transportation energy and climate roadmap—the impact of transportation policies and their potential to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, D.C.: ICCT.Google Scholar
  36. ICCT (2017). 2017 Global update: light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel economy standards. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  37. ICTSD (2018). IMO gears up to set climate-related targets for shipping sector. Bridges, Volume 22(9). Accessed 05 April 2018.
  38. IEA. (2014). Energy technology perspectives 2014—harnessing electricity’s potential. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  39. IEA. (2015). Energy technology perspectives 2015—mobilising innovation to accelerate climate action. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  40. IEA. (2016a). CO 2 emissions from fuel combustion—highlights. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  41. IEA. (2016b). World energy outlook. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  42. IEA. (2016c). Energy technology perspectives 2016—towards sustainable urban energy systems. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  43. IEA. (2016d). Global EV Outlook 2016. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  44. IEA. (2017a). Energy technology perspectives 2017—catalysing energy technology transformations. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  45. IEA (2017b). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion online data service 2017 edition. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  46. IEA. (2017c). Global EV Outlook 2017. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
  47. IEA & IRENA (2017). Perspectives for the energy transition—investment needs for a low-carbon energy system. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  48. IIASA (2014). AR5 Scenario Database. Accessed 8 Sept 2017.
  49. IPCC (2014a). Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) Summary for Policy Makers. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.
  50. IPCC (2014b). Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  51. ITF. (2017). Transport Outlook 2017. Transport demand and CO 2 emissions to 2050. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. ITF. (2018). Decarbonising maritime transport. Pathways to zero-carbon shipping by 2035. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Institute for Transport Policy Studies (2013). The Study for Long-Term Transport Action Plan for ASEAN (LPA Project). Accessed 12 February 2018.
  54. International Maritime Organization. (2015). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  55. ITPS & Clean Air Asia (2014). A study on a long-term transport action plan for ASEAN. Accessed 03 April 2018.
  56. Keating, D. (2014). Burden-sharing: is road transport paying its fair share? Accessed 05 Sept 2017.
  57. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kenworthy, J. R. (2017). Is automobile dependence in emerging cities an irresistible force? Perspectives from São Paulo, Taipei, Prague, Mumbai, Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou. Sustainability, 9(11), 1953. Scholar
  59. Kirchner, A. & Matthes, F. (2009). Blueprint Germany - A strategy for a climate safe 2050. WWF. . Accessed 12 February 2018.
  60. Kittner, N., Lill, F., & Kammen, M. (2017). Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition. Nature Energy, 2.
  61. Lee, D. S., Lim, L., & Owen, B. (2013). Shipping and aviation emissions in the context of a 2°C emission pathway. Accessed 01 September 2017.
  62. Lindegaard, A., Aasrud, A., Andersen, A., Andresen, S. R., Asphjell, T., Backer, E. B., et al. (2014). Knowledge base for low-carbon transition in Norway. Mexico City: Norwegian Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  63. LTA (2017). Monthly COE quota from November 2017 to February 2018. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  64. Mittal, S., Dai, H., Fujimori, S., Hanaoka, T., & Zhang, R. (2017). Key factors influencing the global passenger transport dynamics using the AIM/transport model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environonment, 55, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mulholland, E., Teter, J., Cazzola, P., McDonald, Z., & Gallachóir, B. (2018). The long haul towards decarbonising road freight—a global assessment to 2050. Applied Energy, 216, 678–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Muncrief, R. & Sharpe, B. (2015). Overview of the heavy-duty vehicle market and CO2 emissions in the European Union. ICCT Working Paper 2015–6. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  67. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2015). Transformative Reduction of Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Opportunities for Change in Technologies and Systems. Golden: National Renewable.Google Scholar
  68. Navigant (2016). Electric bicycles. Li-Ion and SLA E-Bikes: Drivetrain, Motor, and Battery Technology Trends, Competitive Landscape, and Global Market Forecasts. Accessed 05 April 2018.
  69. Pietzcker, R. C., Longden, T., Chen, W., Fu, S., Kriegler, E., Kyle, P., & Luderer, G. (2014). Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy, 64(Supplement C), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. PPMC (2015). Renewable energy and transport—decarbonising fuel in the transport sector. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  71. PPMC (2017a). Global macro roadmap. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
  72. PPMC (2017b). Transport at COP23 Bonn. State and non-state actions coverging on transport: Transport Decarbonization Alliance (TDA) Established. Day Six and Seven—13 November 2017. Accessed 05 April 2018.
  73. PPMC (2017c). 2017 A new Transport Decarbonization Alliance calls frontrunners to step forward! Accessed 03 April 2018.
  74. Revill, C. & Harris, V. (2017). 2020—The Climate Turning Point. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.
  75. Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2015). Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 [deg]C. [Perspective]. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schaeffer, M., Rogelj, J., Roming, N., Sferra, F., Hare, B., & Serdeczny, O. (2015). Feasibility of limiting warming to 1.5 and 2°C. Climate Analytics. Accessed 01 Sept 2017.
  77. Schäfer, A. W. (2017). Long-term trends in domestic US passenger travel: the past 110 years and the next 90. Transportation, 44(2), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Science-Based Targets Initiative (2015). Companies commit to set ambitious science-based emissions reduction targets, surpassing goal. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.
  79. Seattle City Council (2013). Seattle Climate Action Plan. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  80. Secretaria de Energia (2015). Carbon Calculator 2050. Accessed 12 February 2018.
  81. Shafiei, E., Davidsdottir, B., Leaver, J., & Stefansson, H. (2017). Energy, economic, and mitigation cost implications of transition toward a carbon-neutral transport sector: a simulation-based comparison between hydrogen and electricity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Siagian, U. W. R., Dewi, R. G., Boer, R., Hendrawan, I., Yuwono, B. B., & Ginting, G. E. (2015). Pathways to deep decarbonization in Indonesia. Jakarta: SDSN, IDDRI.Google Scholar
  83. Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D'Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., et al. (2014). Transport. In Climate Change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 599–670). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Skinner, I., van Essen, H., Smokers, R., & Hill, N. (2010). EU Transport GHG: Routes to 2050? European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  85. Stockholms Stad (2014). Roadmap for a fossil fuel-free Stockholm 2050. for a fossil fuel-free Stockholm 2050.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2017.
  86. Swedish Government (2017). The Climate Policy Framework. Accessed 22 September 2017.
  87. Tietge, U., Mock, P., German, J. & Bandivadekar, A. (2017). From laboratory to road. A 2017 update of official and “real-world” fuel consumption and CO2 values for passenger cars in Europe. ICCT White Paper. Accessed 03 April 2018.
  88. Transport for London (2017). Mayor’s transport strategy: draft for public consultation. Accessed 21 October 2017.
  89. UNEP (2015). Promoting Low Carbon Transport in India. . Accessed 12 February 2018.
  90. UNEP. (2016). The Emissions Gap Report 2016. A UNEP Synthesis Report. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  91. UNFCCC (2011). The Cancun Agreements: outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. Accessed 22 September 2017.
  92. UNFCCC (2015). Morocco. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) under the UNFCCC. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  93. UNFCCC (2016a). Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update. Accessed 22 September 2017.
  94. UNFCCC (2016b). Morocco. Nationally Determined Contribution under the UNFCCC. Accessed 04 April 2018.
  95. UNFCCC (2017). Technology Needs Assessment—pathways for climate tech implementation. Accessed 19 October 2017.
  96. United Nations (2015). Paris Agreement. Accessed 10 September 2017.
  97. World Bank (2018). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Accessed 12 February 2018.
  98. World Energy Council (2011). Global Transport Scenarios 2050. London: World Energy Council.Google Scholar
  99. Yeh, S., Mishra, G. S., Fulton, L., Kyle, P., McCollum, D. L., Miller, J., Cazzola, P., & Teter, J. (2017). Detailed assessment of global transport-energy models’ structures and projections. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environonment, 55, 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon TransportShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Geo-Information Science & Earth Observation (ITC)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations