A library of building occupant behaviour models represented in a standardised schema
- 78 Downloads
Over the past four decades, a substantial body of literature has explored the impacts of occupant behaviour (OB) on building technologies, operation, and energy consumption. A large number of data-driven behavioural models have been developed based on field data. These models lack standardisation and consistency, leading to difficulties in applications and comparison. To address this problem, an ontology was developed using the drivers-needs-actions-systems (DNAS) framework. Recent work has been carried out to implement the theoretical DNAS framework into an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) schema, titled ‘occupant behaviour XML’ (obXML) which is a practical implementation of OB models that can be integrated into building performance simulation (BPS) programs. This paper presents a newly developed library of OB models represented in the standardised obXML schema format. This library provides ready-to-use examples for BPS users to employ more accurate occupant representation in their energy models. The library, which contains an initial effort of 52 OB models, was made publicly available for the BPS community. As part of the library development process, limitations of the obXML schema were identified and addressed, and future improvements were proposed. Authors hope that by compiling this library building, energy modellers from all over the world can enhance their BPS models by integrating more accurate and robust OB patterns.
KeywordsOccupant behaviour Building performance simulation XML schema obXML Occupant behaviour model
This work is part of the research activities of the International Energy Agency, Energy in Buildings and Communities Program, Annex 66: Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behaviour in Buildings. We would like to express our gratitude to Yixing Chen of LBNL for providing valuable insights into the XML schema issues and to double-check quality of models in the library. Authors wish to acknowledge a Fulbright Visiting Student Researcher Award from the Fulbright Hungarian-American Commission for Educational Exchange which enabled scientific exchange between Budapest University of Technology and Economics and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
This work was sponsored by the United States Department of Energy (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231) under the U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center on Building Energy Efficiency. This project was supported financially by the Fulbright Hungarian-America Commission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ahmad, M. & Culp, C. H. (2006). Uncalibrated building energy simulation modeling results, 12(4), 1141–56.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
- Anderson, R., Christensen, C., & Horowitz, S. (2006). Analysis of residential system strategies targeting least-cost solutions leading to net zero energy homes. Transactions-American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 112(2), 330.Google Scholar
- ASHRAE. (2009). Handbook-Fundamentals. Energy estimating and modeling methods. Atlanta: ASHRAEGoogle Scholar
- Clark, J. A. (2001). Energy simulation in building design (2nd ed.). London: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Crawley, D. B. (2008). Estimating the impacts of climate change and urbanization on building performance. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(November 2011), 37–41.Google Scholar
- D’Oca, S., Hong, T., & Langevin, J. (2017a). The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(May 2017), 731–742.Google Scholar
- EnergyPlus. (n.d.) http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/. Accessed 01 Mar 2016
- Ferrara, M., et al. (2014). Modelling zero energy buildings: parametric study for the technical optimization. Energy Procedia, 62, 200–209 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610214034122.
- Gabbar, H. A., et al. (2014). Building thermal energy modeling with loss minimization. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 49, 110–121. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1569190X14001439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaetani, I., Hoes, P.-J., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2016). Occupant behavior in building energy simulation: towards a fit-for-purpose modeling strategy. Energy and Buildings. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778816301918 , 121, 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griego, D., Krarti, M., & Hernandez-Guerrero, A. (2015). Energy efficiency optimization of new and existing office buildings in Guanajuato, Mexico. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 132–140. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210670715000487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guillemin, A., & Molteni, S. (2002). An energy-efficient controller for shading devices self-adapting to the user wishes. Building and Environment, 37(11), 1091–1097. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132301001135 (March 8, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hailemariam, E., Goldstein, R., Attar, R., & Khan, A. (2011). Real-time occupancy detection using decision trees with multiple sensor types. Procs. of the 2011 Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (pp. 141–48).Google Scholar
- Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2008). On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants. Building and Environment, 43(12), 2163–2177. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132308000024 (February 26, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2009). Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 44(12), 2378–2395. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132309000961 (January 27, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hong, T., Chou, S. K., & Bong, T. Y. (2000). Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources. Building and Environment, 1323.Google Scholar
- Hong, T., Sun, H., Chen, Y., Taylor-Lange, S. C., et al. (2015b). An occupant behavior modeling tool for co-simulation. Energy and Buildings. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778815303480.
- Hong, T., D’Oca, S., Taylor-Lange, S. C., et al. (2015c). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94, 196–205. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132315300871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hong, T., Chen, Y., Belafi, Z., & D’Oca, S. (2018). Occupant behavior models: Implementation and representation in building performance simulation programs. Building Simulation, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0396-6.
- Hopfe, C. J., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2011). Uncertainty analysis in building performance simulation for design support. Energy and Buildings, 43(10), 2798–2805. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778811002830 (January 30, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunt, D. R. G. (1980). Predicting artificial lighting use-a method based upon observed patterns of behaviour. Lighting Research and Technology, 12(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
- IEA EBC - Annex66. (n.d.) Occupants behavior research bibliography. http://annex66.org/?q=biblio (January 1, 2016).
- Inkarojrit, V. (2008). Monitoring and modelling of manually-controlled venetian blinds in private offices: a pilot study. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(2), 75–89. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19401490802021012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Institution of Structural Engineers. (2013). Building information modelling—projects and perspectives. The Structural Engineer 91(11). http://buildingsmart.pl/StructuralEngineer2013Nov-BIM.pdf.
- Kanagaraj, G., & Mahalingam, A. (2011). Designing energy efficient commercial buildings—a systems framework. Energy and Buildings, 43(9), 2329–2343. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778811002374 (August 18, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, Y.-S., et al. (2015). Recent advances on building information modeling. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 2–4.Google Scholar
- Mahdavi, A., & Pröglhöf, C. (2009). User behaviour and energy performance in buildings. 6. Internationalen Energiewirtschaftstagung an der TU Wien: 1–13. http://eeg.tuwien.ac.at/eeg.tuwien.ac.at_pages/events/iewt/iewt2009/papers/4E_1_MAHDAVI_A_P.pdf.
- Newsham, G. R. (1994). Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: implications for comfort and energy consumption. Indoor Environment, 6(3), 135–144.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, A.-T., Reiter, S., & Rigo, P. (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113, 1043–1058. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913007058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NIBS. (2009). National Institute of Building Sciences: buildingSMARTalliance brochure, [online].Google Scholar
- Nicol, J. F. (2001). Characterising occupant behavior in buildings: towards a stochastic model of occupant use of indows, lights, blinds heaters and fans. Seventh International IBPSA Conference (pp. 1073–78).Google Scholar
- Pellegrino, M., & Musy, M. (2017). Seven questions around interdisciplinarity in energy research. Energy Research and Social Science, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.007.
- Polinder, H., et al. (2013). Final Report Annex 53—occupant behavior and modeling.Google Scholar
- Ren, X., Yan, D., & Wang, C. (2014). Air-conditioning usage conditional probability model for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 81(0), 172–182. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132314002145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stem, P., Young, O., & Druckman, D. (1991). Global environmental change: understanding the human dimensions. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.). Building energy software tools directory. <https://buildingdata.energy.gov/cbrd/resource/705>. Accessed 4-6-17
- XML Spy. (n.d.). http://www.altova.com/xmlspy.html (January 1, 2016).
- Yan, D., et al. (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107, 264–278. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778815302164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yan, D., Hong, T., et al. (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings. 156, 258–270.Google Scholar
- Yun, G. Y., & Steemers, K. (2008). Time-dependent occupant behaviour models of window control in summer. Building and Environment, 43(9), 1471–1482. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036013230700159X (February 17, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2012a). Factors influencing occupants’ blind-control behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 54, 137–147. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132312000558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2012b). Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 50, 125–134. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132311003672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar