Advertisement

A library of building occupant behaviour models represented in a standardised schema

  • Zsofia Deme Belafi
  • Tianzhen Hong
  • Andras Reith
Original Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Over the past four decades, a substantial body of literature has explored the impacts of occupant behaviour (OB) on building technologies, operation, and energy consumption. A large number of data-driven behavioural models have been developed based on field data. These models lack standardisation and consistency, leading to difficulties in applications and comparison. To address this problem, an ontology was developed using the drivers-needs-actions-systems (DNAS) framework. Recent work has been carried out to implement the theoretical DNAS framework into an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) schema, titled ‘occupant behaviour XML’ (obXML) which is a practical implementation of OB models that can be integrated into building performance simulation (BPS) programs. This paper presents a newly developed library of OB models represented in the standardised obXML schema format. This library provides ready-to-use examples for BPS users to employ more accurate occupant representation in their energy models. The library, which contains an initial effort of 52 OB models, was made publicly available for the BPS community. As part of the library development process, limitations of the obXML schema were identified and addressed, and future improvements were proposed. Authors hope that by compiling this library building, energy modellers from all over the world can enhance their BPS models by integrating more accurate and robust OB patterns.

Keywords

Occupant behaviour Building performance simulation XML schema obXML Occupant behaviour model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the research activities of the International Energy Agency, Energy in Buildings and Communities Program, Annex 66: Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behaviour in Buildings. We would like to express our gratitude to Yixing Chen of LBNL for providing valuable insights into the XML schema issues and to double-check quality of models in the library. Authors wish to acknowledge a Fulbright Visiting Student Researcher Award from the Fulbright Hungarian-American Commission for Educational Exchange which enabled scientific exchange between Budapest University of Technology and Economics and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Funding information

This work was sponsored by the United States Department of Energy (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231) under the U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center on Building Energy Efficiency. This project was supported financially by the Fulbright Hungarian-America Commission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, M. & Culp, C. H. (2006). Uncalibrated building energy simulation modeling results, 12(4), 1141–56.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R., Christensen, C., & Horowitz, S. (2006). Analysis of residential system strategies targeting least-cost solutions leading to net zero energy homes. Transactions-American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 112(2), 330.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, C. J., Yi, D., Krogmann, U., Senick, J. A., & Wener, R. E. (2011). Designing buildings for real occupants: an agent-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, 41(6), 1077–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASHRAE. (2009). Handbook-Fundamentals. Energy estimating and modeling methods. Atlanta: ASHRAEGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, J. A. (2001). Energy simulation in building design (2nd ed.). London: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  7. Crawley, D. B. (2008). Estimating the impacts of climate change and urbanization on building performance. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(November 2011), 37–41.Google Scholar
  8. D’Oca, S., Hong, T., & Langevin, J. (2017a). The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(May 2017), 731–742.Google Scholar
  9. D’Oca, S., Chen, C.-f., Hong, T., & Belafi, Z. (2017b). Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: an interdisciplinary framework for context and behavior in office buildings. Energy Research and Social Science, 34(July), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EnergyPlus. (n.d.) http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/. Accessed 01 Mar 2016
  11. Ferrara, M., et al. (2014). Modelling zero energy buildings: parametric study for the technical optimization. Energy Procedia, 62, 200–209 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610214034122.
  12. Fumo, N. (2014). A review on the basics of building energy estimation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabbar, H. A., et al. (2014). Building thermal energy modeling with loss minimization. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 49, 110–121. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1569190X14001439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaetani, I., Hoes, P.-J., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2016). Occupant behavior in building energy simulation: towards a fit-for-purpose modeling strategy. Energy and Buildings. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778816301918 , 121, 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garber, B. R. (2009). Optimisation stories. Architectural Design, 79(2), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griego, D., Krarti, M., & Hernandez-Guerrero, A. (2015). Energy efficiency optimization of new and existing office buildings in Guanajuato, Mexico. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 132–140. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210670715000487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillemin, A., & Molteni, S. (2002). An energy-efficient controller for shading devices self-adapting to the user wishes. Building and Environment, 37(11), 1091–1097. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132301001135 (March 8, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunay, H. B., O’Brien, W., & Beausoleil-Morrison, I. (2015). Implementation and comparison of existing occupant behaviour models in EnergyPlus. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1493(February), 1–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2015.1102969.Google Scholar
  19. Hailemariam, E., Goldstein, R., Attar, R., & Khan, A. (2011). Real-time occupancy detection using decision trees with multiple sensor types. Procs. of the 2011 Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (pp. 141–48).Google Scholar
  20. Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2008). On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants. Building and Environment, 43(12), 2163–2177. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132308000024 (February 26, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2009). Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 44(12), 2378–2395. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132309000961 (January 27, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heo, Y., Choudhary, R., & Augenbroe, G. A. (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy & Buildings, 47, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong, T., Chou, S. K., & Bong, T. Y. (2000). Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources. Building and Environment, 1323.Google Scholar
  24. Hong, T., Taylor-Lange, S. C., D’Oca, S., Da, Y., et al. (2015a). Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 116, 694–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hong, T., Sun, H., Chen, Y., Taylor-Lange, S. C., et al. (2015b). An occupant behavior modeling tool for co-simulation. Energy and Buildings. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778815303480.
  26. Hong, T., D’Oca, S., Taylor-Lange, S. C., et al. (2015c). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94, 196–205. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132315300871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong, T., Da, Y., D’Oca, S., & Chen, C.-f. (2016). Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: the big picture. Building and Environment, 114, 518–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hong, T., Chen, Y., Belafi, Z., & D’Oca, S. (2018). Occupant behavior models: Implementation and representation in building performance simulation programs. Building Simulation, 11(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0396-6.
  29. Hopfe, C. J., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2011). Uncertainty analysis in building performance simulation for design support. Energy and Buildings, 43(10), 2798–2805. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778811002830 (January 30, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt, D. R. G. (1980). Predicting artificial lighting use-a method based upon observed patterns of behaviour. Lighting Research and Technology, 12(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
  31. IEA EBC - Annex66. (n.d.) Occupants behavior research bibliography. http://annex66.org/?q=biblio (January 1, 2016).
  32. Inkarojrit, V. (2008). Monitoring and modelling of manually-controlled venetian blinds in private offices: a pilot study. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(2), 75–89. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19401490802021012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Institution of Structural Engineers. (2013). Building information modelling—projects and perspectives. The Structural Engineer 91(11). http://buildingsmart.pl/StructuralEngineer2013Nov-BIM.pdf.
  34. Kanagaraj, G., & Mahalingam, A. (2011). Designing energy efficient commercial buildings—a systems framework. Energy and Buildings, 43(9), 2329–2343. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778811002374 (August 18, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, H. W., & Hong, T. (2013). On variations of space-heating energy use in office buildings. Applied Energy, 111, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, Y.-S., et al. (2015). Recent advances on building information modeling. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 2–4.Google Scholar
  37. Love, J. A. (1998). Manual switching patterns in private offices. Lighting Research and Technology, 30(1), 45–50. http://lrt.sagepub.com/content/30/1/45%5Cn http://lrt.sagepub.com/content/30/1/45.full.pdf.
  38. Lutzenhiser, L. (1993). Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18, 247–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahdavi, A., & Pröglhöf, C. (2009). User behaviour and energy performance in buildings. 6. Internationalen Energiewirtschaftstagung an der TU Wien: 1–13. http://eeg.tuwien.ac.at/eeg.tuwien.ac.at_pages/events/iewt/iewt2009/papers/4E_1_MAHDAVI_A_P.pdf.
  40. Mahdavi, A., Mohammadi, A., Kabir, E., & Lambeva, L. (2008). Occupants’ operation of lighting and shading systems in office buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newsham, G. R. (1994). Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: implications for comfort and energy consumption. Indoor Environment, 6(3), 135–144.Google Scholar
  42. Nguyen, A.-T., Reiter, S., & Rigo, P. (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113, 1043–1058. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913007058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. NIBS. (2009). National Institute of Building Sciences: buildingSMARTalliance brochure, [online].Google Scholar
  44. Nicol, J. F. (2001). Characterising occupant behavior in buildings: towards a stochastic model of occupant use of indows, lights, blinds heaters and fans. Seventh International IBPSA Conference (pp. 1073–78).Google Scholar
  45. Pacheco, R., Ordóñez, J., & Martínez, G. (2012). Energy efficient design of building: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3559–3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pellegrino, M., & Musy, M. (2017). Seven questions around interdisciplinarity in energy research. Energy Research and Social Science, 0–1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.007.
  47. Polinder, H., et al. (2013). Final Report Annex 53—occupant behavior and modeling.Google Scholar
  48. Raftery, P., Keane, M., & Donnell, J. O. (2011). Calibrating whole building energy models: an evidence-based methodology. Energy & Buildings, 43(9), 2356–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reinhart, C. F., & Voss, K. (2003). Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Lighting Research and Technology, 35(3), 243–258. http://lrt.sagepub.com/content/35/3/243.abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ren, X., Yan, D., & Wang, C. (2014). Air-conditioning usage conditional probability model for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 81(0), 172–182. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132314002145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saari, A., et al. (2012). Financial viability of energy-efficiency measures in a new detached house design in Finland. Applied Energy, 92, 76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stem, P., Young, O., & Druckman, D. (1991). Global environmental change: understanding the human dimensions. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tibi, G., Ghaddar, N., & Ghali, K. (2013). Sustainable design guidelines for detached housing in the Lebanese Inland Region. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1(2), 177–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trčka, M., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2010). Overview of HVAC system simulation. Automation in Construction, 19(2), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.). Building energy software tools directory. <https://buildingdata.energy.gov/cbrd/resource/705>. Accessed 4-6-17
  56. Wetter, M. (2011). Co-simulation of building energy and control systems with the building controls virtual test bed. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4(3), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. XML Spy. (n.d.). http://www.altova.com/xmlspy.html (January 1, 2016).
  58. Yan, D., et al. (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107, 264–278. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778815302164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yan, D., Hong, T., et al. (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings. 156, 258–270.Google Scholar
  60. Yoshino, H., Hong, T., & Nord, N. (2017). IEA EBC Annex 53: total energy use in buildings—analysis and evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings, 152, 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yun, G. Y., & Steemers, K. (2008). Time-dependent occupant behaviour models of window control in summer. Building and Environment, 43(9), 1471–1482. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036013230700159X (February 17, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2012a). Factors influencing occupants’ blind-control behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 54, 137–147. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132312000558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2012b). Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 50, 125–134. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132311003672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pal Csonka Doctoral School, Faculty of ArchitectureBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Building Technology and Urban Systems DivisionLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Advanced Building and Urban Design (ABUD)BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations