Energy Efficiency

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 1221–1240 | Cite as

Evaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community events

  • Michelle Grace Scott
  • Alaric McCarthy
  • Rebecca Ford
  • Janet Stephenson
  • Seth Gorrie
Original Article

Abstract

New Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.

Keywords

Energy Housing Intervention Home energy audit Community events Behaviour change 

Supplementary material

12053_2015_9420_MOESM1_ESM.docx (315 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 315 kb)
12053_2015_9420_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (894 kb)
ESM 2(PDF 893 kb)
12053_2015_9420_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (623 kb)
ESM 3(PDF 623 kb)

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartiaux, F. (2008). Does environmental information overcome practice compartmentalisation and change consumers’ behaviours? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (11), 1170–1180.Google Scholar
  3. Bartiaux, F., Gram-Hanssen, K., Fonseca, P., Ozoliņa, L., & Christensen, T. H. (2014). A practice–theory approach to homeowners’ energy retrofits in four European areas. Building Research & Information, 42 (4), 525–538.Google Scholar
  4. Breysse, P., Farr, N., Galke, W., Lanphear, B., Morely, R., & Bergofsky, L. (2004). The relationship between housing and health: children at risk. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(15), 1583–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households. Energy Economics, 38, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darby, S. (2001). Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. In Energy efficiency in household appliances and lighting (pp. 685–696). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darby, S. (2006a). Social learning and public policy: lessons from an energy-conscious village. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2929–2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darby, S. (2006b). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Oxford, UK: Environmental Change Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, J. R., Hayes, M., Hulchanski, D., Hwang, S., & Potvin, L. (2004). Housing as a socio-economic determinant of health: a Canadian research framework. In P. Howden-Chapman & P. Carroll (Eds.), Housing and health: research, policy and innovation. Wellington: Steele Roberts Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority website, http://www.eeca.govt.nz/eeca-programmes-and-funding/programmes/homes/insulation-programme accessed 7/12/14
  11. European Commission. (2013). Green Paper. A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. COM (2013) 169 final.Google Scholar
  12. European Council. (2014). European Council conclusions. Brussels: EUCO 169/14.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller, M. C., Kunkel, C., Zimring, M., Hoffman, I., Soroye, K. L., & Goldman, C. (2011). Driving demand for home energy improvements: motivating residential customers to invest in comprehensive upgrades that eliminate energy waste, avoid high utility bills, and spur the economy (Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory).Google Scholar
  15. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  16. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011). Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harries, T., Rettie, R., Studley, M., Burchell, K., & Chambers, S. (2013). Is social norms marketing effective? A case study in domestic electricity consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 47(9), 1458–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirst, E., Berry, L., & Soderstrom, J. (1981). Review of utility home energy audit programs. Energy, 6(7), 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hitchings, R., & Lee, S. J. (2008). Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement the case of young people in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Material Culture, 13(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howden-Chapman, P. (2004). Housing standards: a glossary of housing and health. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 58, 162–168.Google Scholar
  22. Howden-Chapman, P., Viggers, H., Chapman, R., O’Sullivan, K., Telfar, B. L., & Lloyd, B. (2012). Tackling cold housing and fuel poverty in New Zealand: a review of policies, research, and health impacts. Energy Policy, 49, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International Energy Agency. (2013). Energy statistics for OECD countries, IEA. doi:10.1787/energy_stats_oecd-2013-en.Google Scholar
  24. Isaacs, N., Camilleri, M., French, L., Pollard, A., Saville-Smith, K., Fraser, R., Rossouw, P., Jowett J. (2006). Energy use in New Zealand households–HEEP year 10 report. New Zealand: Building Research Association of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  25. Isaacs, N., Saville-Smith, K., Camilleri, M., & Burrough, L. (2010). Energy in New Zealand houses: comfort, physics and consumption. Building Research & Information, 38, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawson, R., Williams, J., & Wooliscroft, B. (2015). Contrasting approaches to fuel poverty in New Zealand. Energy Policy, 81, 38–42. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd, C. R., Callau, M. F., Bishop, T., & Smith, I. J. (2008). The efficacy of an energy efficient upgrade program in New Zealand. Energy and Buildings, 40(7), 1228–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (2013). Energy in New Zealand: comprehensive information on and analysis of New Zealand’s energy supply, demand and prices (p. 80). New Zealand: Wellington 6140. ISSN 2324–5913.Google Scholar
  29. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA). (2013). Climate data and activities. http://www.niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/resources/climate. Accessed 16.11.2013.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, K., Walls, M., Gordon, H., & Gerarden, T. (2013). Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: results from a survey of home energy auditors. Energy Efficiency, 6(2), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Public Health Advisory Committee. (2002). The health of people and communities: the effect of environmental factors of the health of New Zealanders. Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee (sub-committee of the National Health Committee).Google Scholar
  32. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romanos, C., Kerr, S., & Will, C. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand: a preliminary consumption-based analysis. Motu Working Paper 14–05 (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research).Google Scholar
  34. Schipper, L., Unander, F., Marie-Lilliu, C., Walker, I., & Murtishaw, S. (2000). Indicators of energy use and efficiency in New Zealand in an international perspective: comparison of trends through 1995 (p. 79). Paris and Berkeley: International Energy Agency and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  35. Shove, E. (2004). Efficiency and consumption: technology and practice. Energy and Environment, 15(6), 1053–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., & Thorsnes, P. (2010). Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38, 6120–6129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Doering, A., Ford, R., Hopkins, D., Lawson, R., McCarthy, A., Rees, D., Scott, M., Thorsnes, P., Walton, S., Williams, J., & Wooliscroft, B. (2015). The energy cultures framework: exploring the role of norms, practices and material culture in shaping energy behaviour in New Zealand. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stern, P. C., Aronson, E., & National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Behavioural Science and Social Aspects of Energy Consumption and Production. (1984). Energy use: the human dimension. New York: W.H: Freeman.Google Scholar
  39. Strengers, Y. A. (2011). Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2135–2144). ACM. New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Strohm, S. (2011). Community-level energy efficiency programs: a literature review of best practices for promotion and recruitment. Retrieved from: www.theresearchshop.ca/resources.Google Scholar
  41. Toi Te Ora - Public Health Service. (2009). Housing and health report. Tauranga: Toi Te Ora - Public Health Service.Google Scholar
  42. Whitmarsh, L., Seyfang, G., & O’Neill, S. (2011). Public engagement with carbon and climate change: to what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilton, E. (2005). Warm homes technical report: home heating methods and fuels in New Zealand. Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand. Retrieved from: http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/air-energy/warmhomes-technical-report-home-heating-methods-and-fuels-new-zealand

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Grace Scott
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alaric McCarthy
    • 1
  • Rebecca Ford
    • 1
  • Janet Stephenson
    • 1
  • Seth Gorrie
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for SustainabilityUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Centre for Sustainability: Agriculture, Food, Energy, Environment (CSAFE)University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations