Energy Efficiency

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 647–662 | Cite as

The economic effect of efficiency programs on energy consumers and producers



An increase in the efficiency of natural gas fired residential appliances allows users to realize the same level of service, heating water for example, while using less natural gas. In addition to this technological benefit to the residential sector, the reduced demand for natural gas depresses the price of natural gas, resulting in pecuniary gains to other energy consumers and pecuniary losses to energy producers. The question we address in this study is whether purely pecuniary effects, those that follow from the price changes elicited by lower usage of natural gas, should enter the debate concerning the implementation of energy efficiency programs. To that end, we explore the price and social welfare impacts of natural gas energy efficiency standards by evaluating the impacts of a specific efficiency standard using the National Energy Modeling System. Our analysis indicates that purely pecuniary losses to producers are largely offset by pecuniary benefits to consumers. Our analysis also provides useful insight into the sources of these benefits and losses. Although our results are based on a specific model and efficiency standard, we believe that the results generalize to other efficiency programs and would be reproduced using other energy models.


Energy efficiency Appliances Standard Economic benefit Transfer 


  1. Berkhout, P. H. G., Muskens, J. C., & Velthuijsen, J. W. (2000). “Defining the Rebound Effect”. Energy Policy, 28, 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borenstein, S., (2013). “a microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications”, Energy Institute at Haas (EI @ Haas) Working Paper Series, April 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Borenstein, S., & Davis, L. W. (2012). The equity and efficiency of two-part tariffs in U.S. natural gas markets. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 75–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Paul, A., & Woerman, M. (2012). “Secular trends, environmental regulations, and electricity markets”. The Electricity Journal, 25(6), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croucher, M. (2012). Energy efficiency: is re-distribution worth the gains? Energy Policy, 45, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DOE (2009). United States Department of Energy, “Residential heating products final rule technical support document”, available at
  7. DOE (2010). “Natural gas revenue decoupling regulation: impacts on industry”, United States Department of Energy, July, 2010.Google Scholar
  8. DOE (2013). “Report to congress on energy conservation standards activities”, United States Department of Energy, August 2013.Google Scholar
  9. EIA (1999). Michael Morris, “The impact of temperature trends on short-term energy demand”, U.S. Energy Information Agency, September 1999.Google Scholar
  10. EIA (2006). Costello, Dave, “Reduced form energy model elasticities from EIA’s Regional Short‐Term Energy Model (RSTEM)”, U.S. Energy Information Agency, May 9, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. EIA (2012a). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “The electricity market module of the National Energy Modeling System Model Documentation, 2012”, December 2012.Google Scholar
  12. EIA (2012b). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Reference Case”, Table 8, DOE/EIA-0383(2012) , June 2012.Google Scholar
  13. EIA (2013a). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Sales of fossil fuels produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012”, May 2013.Google Scholar
  14. EIA (2013b). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Reference Case Natural Gas Production by Category.”Google Scholar
  15. EIA (2013c). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Oil and gas supply module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation 2013”, May 2013.Google Scholar
  16. EIA (2013d). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Model Documentation Report: Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module of the National Energy Modeling”, January 2013.Google Scholar
  17. EIA (2013e). U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS), Cost of Natural Gas Used in Manufacturing Sector Has Fallen”, MECS 2010 — Release date: September 6, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. EIA (2014). Table provided by EIA, August, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. GAO (2007). United States Government Accountability Office, “Oil and gas royalties: a comparison of the share of revenue received from oil and gas production by the federal government and other resource owners”, GAO-07-676R.Google Scholar
  20. Hausman, J. A., & Joskow, P. L. (1982). Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Appliance Efficiency Standards. The American Economic Review, 72(2), Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1982), pp. 220–225.Google Scholar
  21. Hotelling, H. (1931). “The economics of exhaustible resources”. Journal of Political Economy, 39(2), 137–175.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Kepes, J., B. Rodgers, P. Van Meurs, (2011). “Gas prices, other factors indicate changes in North American/shale play fiscal systems”, Oil and Gas Journal, Vol. 109, Issue 14, 4/04/2012.Google Scholar
  23. Khazzoom, J. D. (1980). "Economic implications of mandated efficiency standards for household appliances". Energy Journal, 1(4), 21–40.Google Scholar
  24. Kuuskraa, V. A., (2008). “Investment decision-making in the oil and gas supply sectors”, Advanced Resources International, January 21, 2008, EIA whitepaper downloaded from:
  25. Linn, J., L. Muehlenbachs, Y. Wang, (2014). “How do natural gas prices affect electricity consumers and the environment?”, Resources for the Future, July, 2014.Google Scholar
  26., (2013), “Industry and Market Structure”,, accessed 4/3/2013 4:05 PM.
  27. Pigou, A. C. (1924). The Economics of Welfare, 2nd edn, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanstad, A. H., & Howarth, R. B. (1994). “Normal markets, market imperfections and energy efficiency”. Energy Policy, 22(10), 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanstad, A. H., Hanemann, W. M., & Auffhammer, M. (2006). End-use energy efficiency in a ‘post-carbon’ California economy: policy issues and research frontiers”. Berkeley, CA: California Climate Change Center at UC-Berkeley.Google Scholar
  30. Sorrell, S., J. Dimitropoulos, (2008). “The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions”, Ecological Economics, (2008), 636–649.Google Scholar
  31. Sutherland, R. (1991). “Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments”. The Energy Journal, 12(3), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sutherland, R. (1994). Energy efficiency or the efficient use of energy resources?”. Energy Sources, 16, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Meurs, P., (2007). “Review of Conventional Oil and Gas Terms of Alberta”, July 29, 2007, downloaded from .
  34. Vannan, M., W. Glass-Husain, (1999). “Managing Gas Assets through Simulation and Scenario Planning”, Presented at the International System Dynamics Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Varian, H. R. (1984). Microeconomic Analysis, Second Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  36. Watkins, G. C. (2001), “Atlantic Petroleum Royalties: Fair Deal or Raw Deal?”, June 2001, The AIMS [Atlantic Institute for Market Studies] Oil and Gas Papers (PAPER #2), Brian Lee Crowley, Series Editor.Google Scholar
  37. Wiser, R., Bolinger, M., & Matt, S. C. (2005). “Easing the natural gas crisis: reducing natural gas prices through increased deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency,” Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)  2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations