Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1181–1199 | Cite as

The impact of government ideology on energy efficiency: evidence from panel data

  • Chun-Ping Chang
  • Chien-Chiang LeeEmail author
  • Aziz N. Berdiev
Original Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of government ideology on energy efficiency using data for a panel of 23 OECD countries over the 1980–2013 period. With dynamic panel data method applied, our evidence suggests that government ideology is a significant determinant of energy efficiency. Specifically, we show that left-wing parties are associated with energy efficiency improvements. Overall, our results are robust to the two measures of energy efficiency variables, alternative measures of government ideology variables, using annual and 3-year averages of the data, the inclusion of economic and political variables, and to model specifications.

Keywords

Government ideology Energy efficiency Political parties Panel data OECD 

JEL Classification

P48 Q40 C23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful the comments for editor and three anonymous referee for our paper. This research is partially supported by the College of Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan under grant CMNSYSU-SRS-2013-04.

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? The American Economic Review, 81, 1170–1188.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, B. W. (2006). Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy, 34, 574–582.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, J. B. (2009). CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China. Ecological Economics, 68, 2658–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–52.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armingeon, K., Engler, S., Potolidis, P., Gerber, M., & Leimgruber, P. (2010). Comparative political data set 1960–2008. Berne: University of Berne, Institute of Political Science.Google Scholar
  7. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre. (2007). A quest for energy security in the 21st century. Japan: Institute of Energy Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, S. (1998). Political economy of the Kyoto Protocol. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beaudreau, B. C. (2005). Engineering and economic growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 211–220.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, T., Levine, R., & Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benton, T. (1997). Beyond left and right? Ecological politics, capitalism and modernity. In J. Michael (Ed.), Greening the millennium? The new politics of the environment (pp. 34–46). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Berdiev, A. N., Kim, Y., & Chang, C. P. (2012). The political economy of exchange rate regimes in developed and developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhatti, Y., Lindskow, K., & Pedersen, L. (2010). Burden-sharing and global climate negotiations: the case of the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy, 10, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjørnskov, C. (2005a). Political ideology and economic freedom. Working Paper 05–8. Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar
  16. Bjørnskov, C. (2005b). Does political ideology affect economic growth? Public Choice, 123, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). The growth-inequality association: government ideology matters. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bodea, C. (2010). The political economy of fixed exchange rate regimes: the experience of post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Böhringer, C. (2000). Cooling down hot air: a global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto carbon abatement strategies. Energy Policy, 28, 779–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. (2010). The costs of compliance: a CGE assessment of Canada’s policy options under the Kyoto Protocol. The World Economy, 33, 177–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. (2013). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2013, London. http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/statistical-review/statistical_review_of_world_energy_2013.pdf.
  23. Bruno, G. S. F. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economic Letters, 87, 361–366.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Budge, I., Keman, H., & Woldendorp, J. (1993). Political data 1945–1990. Party government in 20 democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 24, 1–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bun, M. J. G., & Kiviet, J. F. (2003). On the diminishing returns of higher-order terms in asymptotic expansions of bias. Economic Letters, 79, 145–152.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Buttel, F., & Flinn, W. (1976). Environmental politics: the structuring of partisan and ideological cleavages in mass environmental attitudes. The Sociological Quarterly, 17, 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cetin, T., & Oguz, F. (2007). The politics of regulation in the Turkish electricity market. Energy Policy, 35, 1761–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chang, C. P., & Berdiev, A. N. (2011). The political economy of energy regulation in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 33, 816–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chang, C. P., Berdiev, A. N., & Lee, C. C. (2013). Energy exports, globalization and economic growth: the case of South Caucasus. Economic Modelling, 33, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dorian, J. P., Franssen, H. T., & Simbeck, D. R. (2006). Global challenges in energy. Energy Policy, 34, 1984–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gastaldi, M., & Nardecchia, A. (2003). The Kalman filter approach for time-varying β estimation. Systems Analysis Modelling Simulation, 43, 1033–1042.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gromet, D. N., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS, 110, 9314–9319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914.Google Scholar
  35. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Honma, S., & Hu, J. L. (2014). A panel data parametric frontier technique for measuring total-factor energy efficiency: an application to Japanese regions. Energy, 78, 732–739.Google Scholar
  37. Huang, Y. (2010). Political institutions and financial development: an empirical study. World Development, 38, 1667–1677.Google Scholar
  38. Hull, D., Ó Gallachóir, B. P., & Walker, N. (2009). Development of a modelling framework in response to new European energy-efficiency regulatory obligations: the Irish experience. Energy Policy, 37, 5363–5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Irrek, W., & Thomas, S. (2008). Defining Energy Efficiency. Working paper.Google Scholar
  40. Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. (2009). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37, 5167–5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Judson, R. A., & Owen, A. L. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Economic Letters, 65, 9–15.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, R. F., & Borchardt, A. (1994). Red and green: air pollution levels and left party power in OECD countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 225–241.Google Scholar
  43. Kiviet, J. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 53–78.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kiviet, J. F. (1999). Expectations of expansions for estimators in a dynamic panel data model; some results for weakly exogenous regressors. In C. Hsiao, K. Lahiri, L.-F. Lee, & M. H. Pesaran (Eds.), Analysis of panels and limited dependent variables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kruyt, B., van Vuuren, D. P., de Vries, H. J. M., & Groenenberg, H. (2009). Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37, 2166–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lamla, M. J. (2009). Long-run determinants of pollution: a robustness analysis. Ecological Economics, 69, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2013). Will policies to promote renewable electricity generation be effective? Evidence from panel stationarity and unit root tests for 115 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 371–379.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, C. C. (2013). Insurance and real output: the key role of banking activities. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17, 235–260.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2005). Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Economics, 27, 857–872.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2008). Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 50–65.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, C. C., & Hsieh, M. F. (2014). Bank reforms, foreign ownership, and financial stability. Journal of International Money and Finance, 40, 204–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee, C. C., & Lee, J. D. (2010). A panel data analysis of the demand for total energy and electricity in OECD countries. Energy Journal, 31, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lesbirel, S. H. (2004). Diversification and energy security risks: the Japanese case. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levine, M. D., Koomey, J. G., Price, L., GeIler, H., & Nadel, S. (1995). Electricity end-use efficiency: experience with technologies, markets and policies throughout the world. Energy, 20, 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lipscy, P.Y. (2013). The electoral politics of energy. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  57. Liu, X. (2005). Explaining the relationship between CO2 emissions and national income—the role of energy consumption. Economics Letters, 87, 325–328.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Löschel, A., Moslener, U., & Rübbelke, D. T. G. (2010). Indicators of energy security in industrialised countries. Energy Policy, 38, 1665–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McKitrick, R. (2006). The politics of pollution: party regimes and air quality in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 39, 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Metcalf, G. E. (2008). An empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level. The Energy Journal, 29, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mierau, J. O., Jong-A-Pin, R., & de Haan, J. (2007). Do political variables affect fiscal policy adjustment decisions? New empirical evidence. Public Choice, 133, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mukherjee, K. (2008). Energy use efficiency in the Indian manufacturing sector: an interstate analysis. Energy Policy, 36, 662–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nelson, J. P. (2002). “Green” voting and ideology: LCV scores and roll-call voting in the U.S. senate, 1988–1998. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Neumayer, E. (2003). Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 45, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Neumayer, E. (2004). The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 51, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49, 1417–1426.Google Scholar
  67. O’Connor, R., Bord, R., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pitlik, H., & Wirth, S. (2003). Do crises promote the extent of economic liberalization?: an empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Potrafke, N. (2009). Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice, 140, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Potrafke, N. (2010a). Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice, 143, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Potrafke, N. (2010b). Labor market deregulation and globalization: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Review of World Economics, 146, 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rahman, S., & Rahman, Md. S. (2013). Energy productivity and efficiency of maize accounting for the choice of growing season and environmental factors: an empirical analysis from Bangladesh. Energy, 49, 329–336.Google Scholar
  73. Ram, R. (2009). Openness, country size, and government size: additional evidence from a large cross-country panel. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9, 86–136.Google Scholar
  75. Scruggs, L. (1999). Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 1–31.Google Scholar
  76. Varone, F., & Aebischer, B. (2001). Energy efficiency: the challenges of policy design. Energy Policy, 29, 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vinuya, F., DiFurio, F., & Sandoval, E. (2010). A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the United States. Applied Economic Letter, 17, 925–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vowles, J. (2008). Does globalization affect public perceptions of ‘Who in power can make a difference’? Evidence from 40 countries, 1996–2006. Electoral Studies, 27, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Warwick, P. V. (1994). Government survival in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wei, D., & Rose, A. (2009). Interregional sharing of energy conservation targets in China: efficiency and equity. The Energy Journal, 30, 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (1998). Party government in 20 democracies: an update (1990–1995). European Journal of Political Research, 33, 125–164.Google Scholar
  82. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2000). Party government in 48 democracies (1945–1998): composition, duration, personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. World Bank. (2010). Lights out? The outlook for energy in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. World Bank. (2011). Doing Business 2011: Making a difference for entrepreneurs. Southern African Development Community (SADC). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  85. World Bank. (2013). World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-Ping Chang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chien-Chiang Lee
    • 3
    Email author
  • Aziz N. Berdiev
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Marketing ManagementShih Chien University at KaohsiungKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.School of Economics and FinanceXi’an Jiaotong UniversityShaanxiChina
  3. 3.Department of FinanceNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsBryant UniversitySmithfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations