Energy Efficiency

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 377–399 | Cite as

Energy feedback technology: a review and taxonomy of products and platforms

  • Beth KarlinEmail author
  • Rebecca Ford
  • Cassandra Squiers
Original Article


Feedback is a promising strategy for energy conservation, and many energy feedback products (i.e. technologies with hardware) and platforms (i.e. technologies without hardware) have emerged on the market in recent years. Past research suggests that the effectiveness of feedback varies based on distinct characteristics, and proposes categories to better understand and distinguish between these characteristics. A review of existing categories, however, identified the following issues: (1) current structures group feedback technologies into four (or fewer) categories, making device distinction and selection onerous; (2) current categories often ignore technical and psychological distinctions of interest to researchers; and (3) none provide a systematic description of the specific characteristics that vary by category. This paper presents a classification structure of feedback technology, derived theoretically from a review of relevant literature and empirically via content analysis of 196 devices. A taxonomy structure of feedback technology was derived based on the characteristics of hardware, communications, control, display, and data collection. The resulting taxonomy included the following nine categories: (1) information platform, (2) management platform, (3) appliance monitor, (4) load monitor, (5) grid display, (6) sensor display, (7) networked sensor, (8) closed management network, and (9) open management network. These categories are mutual exclusive and exhaustive of the identified technologies collected and are based on characteristics, which are both stable and important to feedback provision. It is hoped that this feedback classification will be of use to both researchers and practitioners trying to leverage the potential of these technologies for energy conservation.


Feedback Conservation Electricity Technology 


  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. & White, V. (2009). Exploring consumer preferences for home energy display functionality. Report to the Energy Saving Trust. Centre for Sustainable Energy.Google Scholar
  3. Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2009). Feedback systems: An introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Badami, V. V., & Chbat, N. W. (1998). Home appliances get smart. Spectrum, IEEE, 35(8), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behaviour modification. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopra, A. (2011). Modeling a green energy challenge after a blue button. Washington: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Accessed 20 April 2012.
  9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. (2005). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Danahy, J. (2009). The coming smart grid data surge. Blogging the Grid. Retrieved from
  14. Darby, S. (2001). Making it obvious: Designing feedback into energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on energy efficiency in household appliances and lighting. Italian Association of Energy Economists/EC-SAVE programme.Google Scholar
  15. Darby, S. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Donahue, G. (2007). Network warrior. O’Reilly Media, IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  17. Donnelly, K. (2010). The technological and human dimensions of residential feedback: An introduction to the broad range of today’s feedback strategies. In People-centered initiatives for increasing energy savings. Washington: ACEEE.Google Scholar
  18. Duffy, P. R. (1984). Cybernetics. Journal of Business Communication, 21(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K. A., & Laitner, J. A. (2010). Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: A meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Washington: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  20. EPRI. (2009). Residential electricity use feedback: A research synthesis and economic framework. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute Report no. 1016844.Google Scholar
  21. Faruqui, A., Harris, D., & Hledik, R. (2010). Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: How increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU’s smart grid investment. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6222–6231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2008). Assessment of demand response & advanced metering. Staff Report.Google Scholar
  23. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fitzpatrick, G., & Smith, G. (2009). Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 8(1), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Froehlich, J. (2009). Promoting energy efficient behaviors in the home through feedback: The role of human-computer interaction. HCIC ‘09 Workshop.Google Scholar
  26. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems.Google Scholar
  27. Goetz, T. (2011). Harnessing the power of feedback loops. Wired Magazine. Accessed 20 April 2012.
  28. Goyal, S. C. & Bakshi, U. A. (2008). Principles of control systems, Chapter 1. Pune: Technical Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Herter, K. (2010). Residential information and controls pilot: Technology review memo – appendix A. El Dorado Hills, CA: Herter Energy Research Slutions.Google Scholar
  30. Herter, K., & Wayland, S. (2009). Behavioural experimentation with residential energy feedback through simulation gaming. Sacramento: California Energy Commission.Google Scholar
  31. Hochwallner, T., & Lang, L. (2009). Approaches for monitoring and reduction of energy consumption in the home. In Seminar-Thesis: Lecture series on sustainable development and information and communication technology.Google Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. (1978). The poverty of management control philosophy. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 450–461.Google Scholar
  33. Institute for Electric Efficiency. (2011). Utility-scale smart meter deployments, plans & proposals. Washington: Institute for Electric Efficiency.Google Scholar
  34. Karlin, B., & Zinger, J. (2013). Residential energy feedback: a meta-analysis and methodological review. Under review.Google Scholar
  35. Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 150–172.Google Scholar
  36. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.Google Scholar
  37. LaMarche, J., Cheney, K., Christian, S., & Roth, K. (2011). Home energy management products & trends. Cambridge: Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems.Google Scholar
  38. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 212–247.Google Scholar
  39. Lawrence, J. W., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Velocity toward goal attainment in immediate experience as a determinant of affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 788–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Marradi, A. (1990). Classification, typology, taxonomy. Quality and Quantity, 24(2), 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKerracher, C., & Torriti, J. (2013). Energy consumption feedback in perspective: Integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on in home displays. Energy Efficiency, 6(2), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neuendorf, K. A. (2001). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J. L. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez, M. (2012). Status on the roll-out of Smart Metering in the EU. Presented at the Eurelectric and ESMIG event, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  46. Schultz, P. W. (2010). Making energy conversation the norm. In Ehrhardt-Martinez, K. & Laitner, J. A. (Eds.), People-centered initiatves for increasing energy savings (251–262). Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  47. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  48. Stein, L. F. (2004). Final report. California information display pilot technology assessment. Boulder: Primen.Google Scholar
  49. Stein, L. F., & Enbar, N. (2006). EPRI solutions custom report direct energy feedback technology assessment.Google Scholar
  50. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17).Google Scholar
  51. Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (1987). What do people think they are doing? The presentation of self through action identification. Pyschological Review, 94(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or the control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wood, G., & Newborough, M. (2007a). Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays. Energy and Buildings, 39(4), 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood, G., & Newborough, M. (2007b). Influencing user behaviour with energy information display systems for intelligent homes. International Journal of Energy Research, 31, 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.University of OtagoOtagoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations