Energy Efficiency

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 293–303

Training the next generation of energy efficiency evaluators

  • Edward Vine
  • William Saxonis
  • Jane Peters
  • Bobbi Tannenbaum
  • Bob Wirtshafter
Original Article

Abstract

The energy efficiency services sector is an increasingly important part of the global economy, with an increased need for trained evaluators to foster energy efficiency program accountability and improvement. Organizations are experiencing difficulty in finding people who are knowledgeable about and experienced in the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. Accordingly, there is a need to assess the training needs of the energy efficiency evaluation community (for both new and “experienced” evaluators). This paper presents the results of a recent survey conducted by the International Energy Program Evaluation Conference (IEPEC) on energy efficiency evaluation training needs and contrasts those findings with the findings from a survey conducted by the American Evaluation Association on young evaluators (those people in the field <5 years) and another by the Association of Energy Services Professionals. This analysis is also complemented by a brief survey of members of the 2012 Rome Conference IEPEC Planning Committee on international needs.

Keywords

Training Evaluation Evaluator IEPEC Energy efficiency Survey 

References

  1. AEA (American Evaluation Association). 2004. Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved from www.eval.org. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  2. ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers). 2010. “Determining Energy Savings from Performance Contracting Projects—Measurement and Verification” training course. Retrieved from www.ashrae.org. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  3. AESP (Association of Energy Services Professionals). 2010. “Principles of Research and Evaluation” training course. Retrieved from www.aesp.org. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  4. Bensch, I., Skumatz, L., & Titus, E. (2006). Evaluators look in the mirror: AESP/IEPEC survey on hot topics and industry perspectives. Proceedings of the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Buildings. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  5. Cooney, K. Navigant Consulting, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  6. EVO (Efficiency Valuation Organization). 2010. “Certified Measurement and Verification Professional Certification” and “Fundamentals of Measurement & Verification: Applying the New IPMVP” training courses. Retrieved from www.evo-world.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=278&Itemid=337. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  7. Goldman, C., Fuller, M., Stuart, E., Peters, J., McRae, M., Albers, N., Lutzenhiser, S., & Spahic, M. (2010). Energy efficiency services sector: workforce size and expectations for growth. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  8. Khawaja, S. The Cadmus Group, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  9. Mathison, S. 2011. Editor’s notes. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Really new directions in evaluation: young evaluators’ perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 131, 1–5.Google Scholar
  10. Patton, M. (2010). Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Peters, J. Research Into Action, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  12. Robinson, S. (2011). Inside, outside, upside down: challenges and opportunities that frame the future of a novice evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Really new directions in evaluation: young evaluators’ perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 131, 65–70.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenberg, M. DNV KEMA, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  14. Vine, E. N. Hall, K. Keating, M. Kushler & R. Prahl. (2010). Emerging issues in the evaluation of energy efficiency programs: the US experience. Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference. Paris, France.Google Scholar
  15. Violette, D. Navigant Consulting, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. White, C. National Grid, 25 April 2012, personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Vine
    • 1
  • William Saxonis
    • 2
  • Jane Peters
    • 3
  • Bobbi Tannenbaum
    • 4
  • Bob Wirtshafter
    • 5
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and California Institute for Energy and EnvironmentBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.New York Department of Public ServiceAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Research Into ActionPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Research Into ActionMadisonUSA
  5. 5.Wirstshafter AssociatesRydalUSA

Personalised recommendations