Energy Efficiency

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 189–201 | Cite as

Strategic homogenisation of energy efficiency measures: an approach to improve the efficiency and reduce the costs of the quantification of energy savings

  • Johannes Reichl
  • Andrea Kollmann


With the ongoing efforts on the European level to promote energy efficiency, the need for the development of harmonised evaluation criteria for energy efficiency measures arises. Such criteria will allow extensive comparisons of the success or failure of the implementation of energy efficiency measures throughout Europe and will support the development of a first–best strategy for the realisation of energy savings targets in Europe. Two fundamental evaluation possibilities exist: bottom-up and top-down quantifications of energy savings. Bottom-up calculations give a more detailed view of the impact of energy efficiency measures but are much more costly and time consuming than top-down calculations. In our opinion, this effort can be reduced without losing precision in the savings calculations by the homogenisation of these energy efficiency measures. In this paper, we develop a framework specifying how such a homogenisation could look.


Energy efficiency measure Strategic measure homogenisation Quantification of energy savings 



The authors want to thank five anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and input.


  1. Adensam, H., Bogner, T., Geissler, S., Groß, M., Hofmann, M., Krawinkler, R., et al. (2008). Bewertung der zielerreichung gemäß energieeffizienz- und energiedienstleistungsrichtlinie 2006/32/EG – bottom up methoden. Technical report, Austrian Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, A. (2008). Homes energy efficiency database (HEED). Technical report, Energy Saving Trust.Google Scholar
  3. Angioletti, R. (2005). The draft french energy law and white certificates system. Presentation held at the experts workshop on bottom-up measurement and evaluation methods in March 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Bertoldi, P., & Rezessy, S. (2008). Tradable white certificates schemes: Fundamental Concepts. Energy Efficiency, 1(4), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (2006). Berichtsformat für die Erfüllung der Berichtsvorgaben nach Art. 10 der Vereinbarung gemäß Art. 15a B-VG zwischen dem Bund und den Ländern über gemeinsame Qualitätsstandards für die Förderung der Errichtung und Sanierung von Wohngebäuden zum Zweck der Reduktion des Ausstoßes von Treibhausgasen (BGBl. II Nr. 19/2006). Technical report.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, E., & Nipkow, J. (2006). Tests and promotion of energy-efficient heat pump dryers. Technical report, Swiss Agency for Efficient Energy Use (S.A.F.E.).Google Scholar
  7. Capozza, A. (2006). Market mechanisms for white certificates schemes—task XIV final report. Technical report, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  8. CEN (2007). Saving lifetimes of energy efficiency improvement measures in bottom-up calculations—CWA 15693. European Committee for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  9. DEER (2008). Database for energy efficient resources., California Public Utilities Commission.
  10. Dell, G. (2004). Energie-Effizienz-Programm Oberösterreich – Energie Star 2010. Programm der Oberösterreichischen Landesregierung.Google Scholar
  11. Dietsch, N. (2007). Model energy efficiency program impact evaluation guide. Technical report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  12. Dreessen, T. K., & Langlois, P. (2005). Practical experiences in applying savings m&v. Presentation held at the 1st Asia ESCO Conference in October 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Energy Saving Trust (2004). Ofgem consultation—energy efficiency commitment 2005–2008: Administration procedures.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2003) Proposal for a Directive of the Euopean Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services.
  15. European Commission (2006). Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  16. Kromer, J. S. (2007). International performance measurement and verification protocol—concepts and options for determining energy and water savings: Volume 1. Technical report, Efficiency Valuation Organization.Google Scholar
  17. Labanca, N. (2007). The EuroWhiteCert Project and the Special Case of White Certificates. Presentation held at the expert workshop on evaluation and monitoring of energy efficiency measures in June 2007.Google Scholar
  18. New York State Department of Public Service (2004). New york energy smart program quarterly evaluation and status report. Technical report, New York State Department of Public Service.Google Scholar
  19. Ofgem (2005). Energy efficiency commitment 2005–2008—technical guidance manual issue 1. Technical report.Google Scholar
  20. Oikonomou, V., Rietbergen, M., & Patel, M. (2007). An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in The Netherlands: A case study for the household sector. Energy Policy, 35(2), 1147–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PennFuture (2005). PennFuture’s comments on energy efficiency and DSM rules for Pennsylvanias’s alternative energy portfolio standard. Comment.Google Scholar
  22. Reed, J. H., Jordan, G., & Vine, E. (2007). Impact evaluation framework for technology deployment programs. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy—Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.Google Scholar
  23. Reichl, J., & Kollmann, A. (2009). The baseline in bottom-up energy efficiency and saving calculations: A concept for its formalisation and a discussion about its Options. In Proceedings of the 5 th Dubrovnik conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems.Google Scholar
  24. Sathaye, J. A. (2006). Energy efficiency project activities observations about CDM: Policies and programs. Presentation at the United Nations Climate Change Conference.Google Scholar
  25. Staniaszek, D. (2005). Measurement and evaluation of energy savings in households and road transport in the UK. Presentation held at the experts workshop on bottom-up measurement and evaluation methods in March 2005.Google Scholar
  26. TecMarket Works, et al. (2004). The California evaluation framework. Technical report, Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission and the Project Advisory Group.Google Scholar
  27. Vine, E. (2008). Breaking down the silos: The integration of energy efficiency, renewable energy, demand response and climate change. Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 49–63.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Vreuls, H. (2005a). Evaluating energy efficiency policy measures & DSM programmes—Volume I. Technical report, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  29. Vreuls, H. (2005b). Evaluating energy efficiency policy measures & DSM programmes—Volume II. Technical report, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  30. Vreuls, H., Thomas, S., & Broc, J.-S. (2009). General bottom-up data collection, monitoring and calculation methods. Technical report, EMEEES Project.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy Institute at the Johannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations