Lifestyle and energy consumption: a comparison of four collective communities in transition
- 345 Downloads
This study applies sociological analysis to energy consumption trends in four small kibbutzim in southern Israel, utilizing the history of these communities as a “natural experiment” for observing how these trends are affected by the transition from collective to private community rules and norms. After normalizing for community size, the intensity of electrical energy consumption was found to decrease in the presence of changes that either (a) increase the efficiency of indoor space use or (b) encourage the active management of energy consumption. The findings indicate that both components must be present to achieve a sustained reduction in community energy intensity and that such an outcome is affected by, but not dependent on, the community’s level of privatization. It is proposed that the unique circumstances of the transitional kibbutz can shed light on behavioral issues which are central to the efficiency of energy consumption in society at large.
KeywordsEnergy consumption Kibbutz Lifestyle
The authors acknowledge the investment of time and energy made by the members of Yahel, Lotan, Ketura, and Grofit, whose input and experience was invaluable, and the cooperation of the Israel Electric Corporation. The study was supported by a grant from the Bona Terra Foundation.
- Abramitzky, R. (2006). The limits of equality: Insights from the Israeli kibbutz. London School of Economics and Political Science. Seminar Paper May 19, 2006. http:\\econ.lse.ac.uk/seminars/papers/productivity-150606.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2007.
- Ben-Rafael, E. (1997). Crisis and transformation: The kibbutz at century’s end. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Feineman, K. (2005). Our home and future: A portrait of kibbutz Lotan. MA thesis. Ben Gurion University, Be’er ShevaGoogle Scholar
- Gavron, D. (2000). The kibbutz: Awakening from utopia. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Hackett, B., & Lutzenhiser, L. (1990). Social stratification and appliance saturation. Proceedings of the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study, 2, 61–68.Google Scholar
- Kershner, I. (2007). The kibbutz sheds socialism and gains popularity. The New York Times. August 27.Google Scholar
- Manor, R. (2004). The renewed kibbutz. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 32(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
- Monnier, E. (1983). Energy inputs and household behavior in France. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 197–207.Google Scholar
- Near, H. (1992). The Kibbutz movement: A history (Vol. 2). Vallentine Mitchell & Co. Ltd., USA.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pavin, A. (2006). Kibbutz movement: Facts and figures 2006. Yad Tabenkin Research and Documentation Center of the Kibbutz Movement.Google Scholar
- Snir, A. (2006). Shifting paradigms: From fostering equality to building safety nets: Some consequences of “privatization” in the Israeli kibbutz. Economic Change and Restructuring, 39(1–2), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Strom, M. (2004). The Thai Revolution: The development of agriculture in the Arava in the 1990s. MSc thesis. Hebrew University, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
- Wilhite, H., & Lutzenhiser, L. (1997). Social loading and sustainable consumption. ECEEE Summer Study. Panel 14 ID 27.Google Scholar