Incentives for energy efficiency in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- 679 Downloads
This paper explores the incentives for energy efficiency induced by the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) for installations in the energy and industry sectors. Our analysis of the National Allocation Plans for 27 EU Member States for phase 2 of the EU ETS (2008–2012) suggests that the price and cost effects for improvements in carbon and energy efficiency in the energy and industry sectors will be stronger than in phase 1 (2005–2007), but only because the European Commission has substantially reduced the number of allowances to be allocated by the Member States. To the extent that companies from these sectors (notably power producers) pass through the extra costs for carbon, higher prices for allowances translate into stronger incentives for the demand-side energy efficiency. With the cuts in allocation to energy and industry sectors, these will be forced to greater reductions; thus, the non-ET sectors like household, tertiary, and transport will have to reduce less, which is more in line with the cost-efficient share of emission reductions. The findings also imply that domestic efficiency improvements in the energy and industry sectors may remain limited since companies can make substantial use of credits from the Kyoto Mechanisms. The analysis of the rules for existing installations, new projects, and closures suggests that incentives for energy efficiency are higher in phase 2 than in phase 1 because of the increased application of benchmarking to new and existing installations and because a lower share of allowances will be allocated for free. Nevertheless, there is still ample scope to further improve the EU ETS so that the full potential for energy efficiency can be realized.
KeywordsClimate policy Emission trading Energy efficiency Innovation
best available technology
combined gas cycle turbines
clean development mechanism
combined heat and power
community independent transaction log
European Union allowance
- EU ETS
EU Emissions Trading Scheme
Kyoto Mechanisms (i.e. JI, CDM)
National Allocation Plan
verified emissions table
The authors would like to thank four anonymous referees for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Participants at the European Council for Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study 2007 in La Colle sur Loup, France, also provided helpful suggestions. Research assistance by Johanna Cludius, Christian Möhrmann, Jakob Rager, Manuel Strauch, and Saskia Ziemann is also acknowledged, as well as proofreading by Gillian Bowman-Koehler and Rob Passey. Parts of this research were sponsored by the Volkswagen Foundation.
- AEA Technology Environment & Ecofys, (2006). LETS update scoping phase report. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/acrobat/scopingphase_1383666.pdf. Accessed 19 October 19, 2007.
- Åhman, M., & Holmgren, K. (2006). New entrant allocation in the Nordic energy sectors—current principles and options for the EU ETS. Climate Policy, 6, 423–440.Google Scholar
- Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Bürer, M. J. (2005). Will emission trading promote end-use energy efficiency and renewable energy projects?. Paper presented at the ACEEE Summer study on efficiency in industry of the American Council for Energy Efficient Economy, New York.Google Scholar
- Betz, R., Rogge, K., & Schleich, J. (2006a). EU emissions trading: An early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012. Climate Policy, 6, 361–394.Google Scholar
- Bovenberg, A. L., & Goulder, L. H. (2002). Environmental taxation and regulation. In A. J. Auerbach, & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (vol. 3, (pp. 1474–1545)). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bovenberg, A. L., Goulder, L. H., & Gurney, D. R. (2005). Efficiency costs of meeting industry-distributional constraints under environmental permits and taxes. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 951–971.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2000). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on EU Policies and Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP). COM (2000) 88 Final. Brussels, 8 March 2000.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2003a). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/EC, OJ L275, 25.10.2003. Brussels, 32–46.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2003b). Non-paper on the installation coverage of the EU emissions trading scheme and the interpretation of Annex I. Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2004a). Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2004b). Communication from the Commission on guidance to assist Member States in the implementation of the criteria listed in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, and on the circumstances under which force majeure is demonstrated, Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2005). Communication from the Commission on further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 Trading Period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme, Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2006a). Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the assessment of national allocation plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in the second period of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme accompanying Commission Decisions of 29 November 2006 on the national allocation plans of Germany, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC, Brussels.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2006b). Community independent transaction log: National reports on verified emission and surrendered allowances. Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2006c). EU emissions trading scheme delivers first verified emissions data for installations, IP/06/XXX. Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2006d). Action plan for energy efficiency: Realising the potential. COM(2006)545 final. Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2008a). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system of the Community. COM (2008) xxx, Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2008b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - 20 20 by 2020 Europe’s climate change opportunity. COM (2008) 30 final, Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- CEC, (2008c). Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. COM(2008) 17 final, Brussels: CEC.Google Scholar
- Cremer, C., & Schleich, J. (2006). Using benchmarking for the primary allocation of EU allowances in the German power sector. Paper presented at the 29th IAEE International Conference, Potsdam.Google Scholar
- Criqui, P., & Kitous, A. (2003). Kyoto protocol implementation (KPI): Technical report: Impacts of linking JI and CDM credits to the European emissions allowance trading scheme. A report for DG Environment, CNRS-IEPE and ENERDATA S.A. (ed.).Google Scholar
- Danish Ministry of the Environment, (2007). Denmark’s National Allocation Plan 2008–2012, English courtesy translation of Denmark’s National Allocation Plan notified to the European Commission 7 March 2007. http://www.mst.dk/NR/rdonlyres/3123145C-A515–4DB7-B877–6C74410F9E5C/38145/20070312danishallocationplanenglishcourtesytransla.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2007.
- EEA (2006). Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe, EEA report. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
- Ehrhart, K.-M., Hoppe, C., Schleich, J., & Seifert, S. (2005). The role of auctions and forward markets in the EU ETS: Counterbalancing the cost-inefficiencies of combining generous allocation with a ban on banking. Climate Policy, 5, 31–46.Google Scholar
- Ehrhart, K.-M., Hoppe, C., & Löschel, R. (2008). Abuse of EU emissions trading for tacit collusion. Environmental and Resource Economics, in press.Google Scholar
- Ellerman, A. D. (2008). New entrant and closure provisions: How do they distort? The Energy Journal, 29(Special Issue in honor of Campbell Watkins), 63–76.Google Scholar
- Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. (2008). Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005–06 emissions data. Resource and Environmental Economics, in press.Google Scholar
- Ellerman, A. D., Joskow, P. L., & Harrison, D. (2003). Emissions trading in the US: Experience, lessons and considerations for greenhouse gases. Arlington, VA, Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C. (2005). Technical innovation and design choices for emissions trading and other climate policies. In B. Hansjürgens (Ed.), Emissions trading for climate policy: US and European perspectives (pp. 37–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C., Parry, I., & Pizer, W. A. (2003). Instrument choice for environmental protection when annex: Summary table of national allocation plans for phase 2 technological innovation is endogenous. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 523–545. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grubb, M., & Ferrario, F. (2006). False confidences: Forecasting errors and emission caps in CO2 trading systems. Climate Policy, 6, 495–501.Google Scholar
- Honkatukia, J., Mälkönen, V., & Perrels, A. (2006). The impact of the European Emission trade system on Finnish wholesale electricity prices. VATT Discussion Paper 405. VATT Government institute for economic research, Helsinki. http://en.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/k405.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2007.
- Hourcade, J. C., Demailly, D., Neuhoff, K., & Sato, M. (2008). Differentiation and dynamics of EU ETS industrial competitiveness impacts climate strategies report. Climate Strategies, London. http://www.climate-strategies.org/uploads/ClimateStrategies_competitiveness_final_report_140108.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2008.
- IPCC, (2005). Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. http://arch.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc/pages_media/SRCCS-final/IPCCSpecialReportonCarbondioxideCaptureandStorage.htm. Accessed 26 January 2008.
- Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2006). Commitments through financial options: A way to facilitate compliance with climate change obligations, Working Paper EPRG0625. http://www.electricitypolicy.org.uk/pubs/wp/eprg0625.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2007.
- Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994a). Energy-efficiency investments and public policy. The Energy Journal, 15, 43–65.Google Scholar
- Keats Martinez, K., & Neuhoff, K. (2005). Allocation of carbon emission certificates in the power sector: How generators profit from grandfathered rights. Climate Policy, 5, 61–78.Google Scholar
- Kettner, C., Köppl, A., Schleicher, S. & Thenius, G. (2007). Stringency and distribution in the EU emissions trading scheme—The 2005 evidence. Nota di Lavora 22.2007 Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
- Matthes, F., Graichen, V., & Repenning, J. (2005). The environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency of the European Union emissions trading scheme: Structural aspects of allocation. Berlin: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
- McKinsey & Ecofys (2006). Review of EU emissions trading scheme—Survey results. Brussels: European Commission, DG Environment.Google Scholar
- Montgomery, D. (2005). Creating technologies to reduce greenhouse gas intensity: Public options and opportunities. Washington, DC: George C. Marshall Institute.Google Scholar
- National Emissions Trading Taskforce, (2006). Discussion paper: Possible design for a national emissions trading scheme. Discussion paper. http://www.emissionstrading.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/2017/Discussion_Paper_-_Full_document.pdf.
- Neuhoff, K., Keats Martinez, K., & Sato, M. (2006). Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy, 6, 73–91.Google Scholar
- Ostertag, K. (2003). No-regret potentials in energy conservation: An analysis of their relevance, size and determinants. Physica: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Peterson, S. (2006). Efficient abatement in separated carbon markets: A theoretical and quantitative analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Working Paper No. 1271, Kiel.Google Scholar
- Peterson, E., & Schleich, J. (2007). Economic and environmental effects of border-tax adjustments. Fraunhofer ISI Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S1/2007 (revised version October 2007).Google Scholar
- Prime Ministerial Task Group on Emissions Trading, (2007). Report of the Task Group on emissions trading. Prime Minister, Canberra. http://www.pmc.gov.au/publications/emissions/index.cfm. Accessed 1 October 2007.
- Reinaud, J. (2007). CO2 Allowance & Electricity Price Interaction—Impact on industry’s electricity purchasing strategies in Europe. IEA Information Paper, OECD/IEA, Paris.Google Scholar
- Rogge, K., Schleich, J., & Betz, R. (2006). An early assessment of national allocation plans for phase 2 of EU emission trading, 01/06, Fraunhofer ISI Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. http://www.isi.fhg.de/n/Projekte/pdf/NAP2_assessment.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2007.
- Røine, K., & Hasselknippe, H. (2007). Carbon 2007—A new climate for carbon trading. Oslo: Point Carbon.Google Scholar
- Schleich, J., & Betz, R. (2005). Incentives for energy efficiency and innovation in the European emission trading system. Paper presented at the ECEEE Summer Study, Mandelieu, France.Google Scholar
- Schmalensee, R., Joskow, P., Ellerman, D., Montero, P., & Baily, E. (1998). An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 53–68.Google Scholar
- Sijm, J., Bakker, S., Chen, Y., Harmsen, H. & Lise, W. (2005). CO2 price dynamics. The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity, ECN-C-05-081, Petten.Google Scholar
- Sijm, J. P., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6, 49–72.Google Scholar
- Sorrell, S., O’Malley, E., Schleich, J., & Scott, S. (2004). The economics of energy efficiency—Barriers to cost-effective investment. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.Google Scholar
- Sterner, T., & Muller, A. (2006). Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade. Resources for the future discussion paper 06–49, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- UNFCCC. (2006). National inventory submissions. Bonn: UNFCCC.Google Scholar
- World Bank (2008). State and trends of the carbon market 2008. Washington D.C: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Zetterberg, L., Nilsson, K., Åhman, M., Kumlin, A.-S., & Birgersdotter, L. (2004). Analysis of national allocation plans for the EU ETS. IVL-report B 1591, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar