Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 44:104 | Cite as

Increasing the effectiveness of handwritten Manipuri Meetei-Mayek character recognition using multiple-HOG-feature descriptors

  • Kishorjit Nongmeikapam
  • Wahengbam Kanan KumarEmail author
  • Oinam Nickson Meetei
  • Themrichon Tuithung
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Detection and reading of the text from natural images is a difficult computer vision task, which is essential in a variety of emerging applications. Document character recognition is one such problem, which has been widely studied and documented by many machine learning and computer vision researchers, which is practically used for solving applications like recognizing handwritten digits. In this paper, a new approach for efficiently extracting cognition out of a total of 56 different classes of Handwritten Manipuri Meetei-Mayek (HMMM) (an Indian language) is described. Although character recognition algorithms have been researched and developed for other Indian scripts, no research work has been reported so far for recognizing all the characters of the Manipuri Meetei-Mayek (MMM). The work begins with a thorough analysis of the recognition task using a single hidden layer type Multilayer Perceptron Feedforward Artificial Neural Network with Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) feature descriptors. After reviewing the level of accuracy and time it takes to train the network, the limitations are experimentally removed using multiple-sized cell grids using HOG descriptors. HOG, being a gradient-based descriptor, is very efficient in data discrimination and very stable with illumination variation. For efficient classification of the HOG features of the MMM, a linear multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier has been proposed for classifying the different offline characters because of its simplicity and speed. The classification based on linear multiclass SVM yielded a very high overall accuracy of 96.928%

Keywords

Manipuri Meetei-Mayek (script) multilayer perceptron feedforward artificial neural network histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) linear multiclass support vector machine (SVM) 

References

  1. 1.
    Wangkhemcha C 2007 A Short History of Kangleipak (Manipur) Part-II. Sagolband Thangjam Leirak, Imphal, India: Kangleipak Historical and Cultural Research CentreGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mangang N K 2003 Revival of a Closed Account, a Brief History of Kanglei Script and the Birth of Phoon (Zero) in the World of Arithmetic and Astrology. Lamshang, Imphal: Sanamahi Laining Amasung Punshiron Khupham (Salai Punshipham)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodson T C 1908 The Meitheis. Delhi: Low Price PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rani A, Rani R and Dhir R 2012 Combination of different feature sets and SVM classifier for handwritten Gurumukhi numeral recognition. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 47(18): 28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arora S, Bhattacharjee D, Nasipuri M, Malik L, Kundu M and Basu D K 2010 Performance comparison of SVM and ANN for handwritten Devanagri character recognition. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 7(3): 01–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinha R M K 2009 A journey from Indian scripts processing to Indian Language processing. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 31(1): 8–31MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pal U, Wakabayashi T and Kimura F 2007 Handwritten Bangla compound character recognition using gradient feature. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Technology, pp. 208–213Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma N, Pal U, Kimura F and Pal S 2007 Recognition of offline handwritten Devanagri characters using quadratic classifier. In: Proceedings of the Indian Conference of Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, pp. 808–816Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basu S, Das N, Sarkar R, Kundu M, Nasipuri M and Basu D K 2005 Handwritten Bangla alphabet recognition using MLP based classifier. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Computer Processing of Bangla, pp. 285–291Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plamondon R and Srihari S 2000 Online and offline handwriting recognition: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(1): 63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maring K A and Dhir R 2014 Recognition of Chesing Iyek/Eeyek-Manipuri digits using support vector machines. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 1(2): 1–6Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romesh L, Singh P B, Singh T S D, Anilkumar S and Singh A U 2014 A neural network based handwritten Meetei Mayek alphabet optical character recognition system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chandan J K and Sanjib K K 2013 Recognition of handwritten numerals of Manipuri script. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 84(17): 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Romesh L, Singh A U, Singh N C, Singh A S and James H 2012 Simulation and modelling of handwritten Meitei Mayek digits using neural network approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Electrical and Computer Science Engineering—EEC 2012, pp. 147–150Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thokchom T, Bansal P K, Vig R and Bawa S 2010 Recognition of handwritten character of Manipuri script. J. Comput. 5(10): 1570–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalal N and Triggs B 2005 Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kresch R and Malah D 1998 Skeleton-based morphological coding of binary images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7(10): 1387–1399MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker J S, Henderson D, Howard R E, Hubbard W and Jackel L D 1990 Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagtion network. In: Touretzky D (Ed.) Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2 (NIPS*89). Denver, CO: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 396–404Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blais A and Mertz D 2001 An Introduction to Neural Networks Pattern Learning with Backpropagation Algorithm. Gnosis Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christianini N and Shawe-Taylor J C 2000 An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Escalera S, Pujol O and Radeva P 2009 Separability of ternary codes for sparse designs of error-correcting output codes. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 30(3): 285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Escalera S, Pujol O and Radeva P 2010 On the decoding process in ternary error-correcting output codes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32(7): 120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kishorjit Nongmeikapam
    • 1
  • Wahengbam Kanan Kumar
    • 2
    Email author
  • Oinam Nickson Meetei
    • 3
  • Themrichon Tuithung
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Information Technology ManipurImphalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringNorth Eastern Regional Institute of Science and TechnologyNirjuliIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Institute of Technology, NagalandDimapurIndia

Personalised recommendations