There is an increasing demand for light-weight, affordable and rapidly processed products as a result of their significant level of superiority these days.
In the present research, the effect of mechanical stir casting on 7075 based lightweight aluminium alloy established together with nano-Al2O3 with average particle size (20–30) nanometre and wt.% of (1.0, 2.0,3.0, and 4.0) has been studied. Several scientists exposed that non-consistent distribution of nanoparticles possessing high porosity in the matrix. Electric stir casting could protect against the difficulties encountered with mechanical stir casting. By infusing Al2O3 particulates right into aluminium alloy the aluminium 7075/1% Wt. Al2O3 is giving area to nanocomposite. By including 1%, micro magnesium powder improved the wettability of the reinforcement. Optical microscope, SEM, studies carried out for the evaluation of composites. SEM micrographs reported that the nanoparticles were consistently distributed throughout the matrix and the active grain microstructure studies were preformed. The hardness, tensile strength, and impact results of Al7075/1% Wt. Al2O3 nanocomposites have been improved as compared with the Al7075 base alloy.
AA 7075 nano-Al2O3Mg stir casting
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The Corresponding author wishes to thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapuramu, India for providing facilities and necessary support in conducting experiments. Also, for the Department of Mechanical Engineering, MITS, Madanapalli, India for all the support and discussion to carry out the research work.
Alizadesh A, Abdollahi A and Biukani H 2015 Creep behaviour and wear resistance of Al 5083 based hybrid composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and boron carbide (B4C). J. Alloys Compd. 650: 783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housaer F, Beclin F, Touzin M, Tingaud D, Legris A and Addad A 2015 Interfacial characterisation in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Mater. Charact. 110: 94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekatou A, Karantzalis A E, Evangelou A, Gousia V, Kaptay G, Gácsi Z, Baumli P and Simon A 2015 Aluminium reinforced by WC and TiC nanoparticles (ex situ) and aluminide particles (in situ): Microstructure, wear and corrosion behaviour. Mater. Des. 65: 1121–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia L, Kondoh K, Imai H, Onishi M, Chen B and Feng Li S 2015 Nano-scale AlN powders and AlN/Al composites by full and partial direct nitridation of aluminium in solid-state. J. Alloys Compd. 629: 184–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanalakshmi S, Mohanasundararaju N and Venkatakrishnan P G 2014 Preparation and mechanical characterisation of stir cast hybrid Al7075–Al2O3–B4C metal matrix composites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 592–594: 705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senthilvelan T, Gopalakannan S, Vishnu Varthan S and Keerthivaran K 2013 Fabrication and Characterization of SiC, Al2O3 and B4C Reinforced Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy (AA 7075) metal matrix composites: a study. Adv. Mater. Res. 622–623: 1295–1299Google Scholar
Rajmohan T, Palanikumar K and Ranganathan S 2013 Evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium matrix composites. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23: 2509–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umanath K, Palanikumar K and Selvamani S T 2013 Analysis of dry sliding wear behaviour of Al6061/SiC/Al2O3 hybrid metal matrix composites. Composites: Part B 53: 159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karthikeyan A and Nallusamy S 2017 Investigation of mechanical properties and wear behaviour of Al–Si–SiC-graphite composite using SEM and EDAX. Mater. Sci. Eng. 225: 1–9Google Scholar
Tang J, Fan G, Li Z, Li X, Xu R, Li Y, Zhang D, Moon W-J, Kaloshkin S D and Churyukanova M 2013 Synthesis of carbon nanotube/aluminium composite powders by polymer pyrolysis chemical vapour deposition. Carbon 55: 202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer L, Pitard F, Poncet D and Demolliens O 1997 Formation of Al3Ti during physical vapour deposition of titanium on aluminium. Microelectron. Eng. 37/38: 381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargavi R and Ramanaiah N 2015 Investigations on the mechanical behaviour of B4C and MoS2 reinforced AA2024 hybrid composites. J. Manuf. Sci. Prod. 15(4): 339–344Google Scholar
Uvaraja V C, Natarajan N, Sivakumar K, Jagadheeshwaran S and Sudhakar S 2015 Tribological behaviour of heat treated Al7075 aluminium metal matrix composites. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 22(1): 51–61Google Scholar
Yuan J, Han J, Liu Z and Jiang Z 2016 Mechanical properties and tribological behaviour of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with in situ AlB2 particles. Tribol. Int. 98: 41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoba C A, Ramanaiah N and Nageswara Rao D 2015 Effect of reinforcement on the cutting forces while machining metal matrix composites: an experimental approach. Eng. Sci. Technol. 18: 658–663Google Scholar
Vettive S C, ElayaPerumal A, Selvakumar N and Franklin Issac R 2014 Experimental investigation on mechanical behaviour, modelling and optimisation of wear parameters of B4C and graphite reinforced aluminium hybrid composites. Mater. Des. 63: 620–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James S J, Venkatesan K, Kuppan P and Ramanujam R 2014 Comparative study of composites reinforced With SiC and TiB2. Proc. Eng. 97: 1012–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nallusamy N, Suresh M, Rajkumar S and Lakshminarayanan A K 2015 Study on mechanical properties of AA6351 alloy reinforced with titanium di-boride (TiB2) composite by in situ casting method. Appl. Mech. Mater. 787: 583–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezatpour H R, Torabi-parizi M and Sajjadi S A 2013 Microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded Al/Al2O3 composites fabricated by a stir-casting process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23: 1262–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar