Advertisement

Sadhana

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 2239–2251 | Cite as

Investigation of innovative steel runway beam in industrial building

  • MAHYAR MAALI
  • ABDULKADIR CÜNEYT AYDINEmail author
  • MERVE SAĞIROĞLU
Article

Abstract

The design of a runway beam for overhead cranes is of great importance when constructing steel structures, as is the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) value obtained for I-beam sections. Therefore, engineers must always consider the optimal design of these beams under overhead cranes loads. In this study, runway beams of three overhead crane groups were analyzed for LTB, and a sinusoidal runway beam body was developed. These runway beams with different sinusoidal angles were analyzed by using the finite element method (ABAQUS) and compared to each other and other runway IPE-IPN beam sections; furthermore, all models were compared with the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction standard. As a result, a new method was proposed for developing sinusoidal runway beams for overhead cranes. The sinusoidal runway beam has lower weight than runway IPE-IPN beam sections. Ultimately, a sinusoidal beam body was developed practically with a scale of 1:1.

Keywords

Lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) Canadian Institute of Steel Construction sinusoidal runway beam finite element method. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my appreciation to Gençler Metal Company and the management of Mr. Zafer GENÇ and Mr. Adem GENÇ, who trusted us, funded our study, and provided their facilities for use as the research site. Furthermore, we would like to express our special appreciation and thanks to the staff of these companies for their cooperation.

References

  1. ABAQUS 2012 Theory and user’s manual, Version 6.12-1Google Scholar
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 1998 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE7-98, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. American Iron and Steel Engineers (AISE) 1996a Technical report no. 6, Specification for electric overhead traveling cranes for steel mill service Google Scholar
  4. American Iron and Steel Engineers (AISE) 1996b Guide for the design and construction of mill buildings, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Technical report no. 13Google Scholar
  5. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc. (. 1989 Specification for structural steel buildings, allowable stress design and plastic design, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford M A and Hancock G J 1984 Elastic interaction of local and global buckling in beams. Thin-Walled Struct. 2: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CMAA 2010a Specifications for top running bridge and gantry type multiple girder electric overhead travelling cranes, Crane Manufactures Association of America, affiliate of Material Handling Industry, Specification#70, Revised. Charlotte, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  8. CMAA 2010b Specifications for top running bridge and under running single girder electric overhead travelling cranes utilizing under running trolley hoist. Crane Manufactures Association of America, affiliate of Material Handling Industry, Specification#74, Revised. Charlotte, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherry S 1960 The stability of beams with buckled compression flanges. Eng. Struct. 38 (9): 277–285Google Scholar
  10. CSA 1996 Safety standard for maintenance and inspection of overhead cranes, gantry cranes, monorails, hoists, and trolleys, Canadian Standards Association standard B167-96, Etobicoke, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies A C 1992 The science and practice of welding—welding science and technology, vol. I, Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellifritt D S and Lue D M 1998 American Institute of Steel Construction, Engineering Journal, Second Quarter, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher J M and Van De Pas J P 2002 New fatigue provisions for the design of crane runway girders. Eng. J. Second Quarter, 65Google Scholar
  14. Galambos T V 1998 Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures, Fifth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Girão Coelho A. M, Bijlaard Frans S K, Nol Gresnigt and Luís Simões da Silva 2004 Experimental assessment of the behaviour of bolted T-stub connections made up of welded plates. J. Construct. Steel Res. 60: 269–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacCrimmen R A 2004 Guide for the design of crane-supporting steel structures, First Editing, Acres International LimitedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohebkhah A and Chegeni B 2012 Local-global interactive buckling of built-up I-beam sections. Thin-Walled Struct. 56: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohri F and Potier-Ferry M 2006 Effects of load height application and pre-buckling deflections on lateral buckling of thin-walled beams. Steel Composite Struct. 6: 401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richter J F 1998 Flexural capacity of slender web plate girders, MS Thesis, Austin, Texas, University of TexasGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodrigues D M, Menezes L F, Loureiro A and Fernandes J V 2004 Numerical study of the plastic behavior in tension of welds in high strength steels. Int. J. Plasticity 20: 1–18zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang S T, Yost M I and Tien Y L 1977 Lateral buckling of locally buckled beams using finite element techniques. Comput. Struct. 7 (7): 469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • MAHYAR MAALI
    • 1
  • ABDULKADIR CÜNEYT AYDIN
    • 1
    Email author
  • MERVE SAĞIROĞLU
    • 2
  1. 1.Ataturk UniversityEngineering Faculty, Civil Engineering DepartmentErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Erzurum Technical UniversityEngineering Faculty, Civil Engineering DepartmentErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations