Sadhana

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 1283–1299 | Cite as

Study of a 30 MW bubbling fluidized bed combustor based on co-firing biomass and coal

Article

Abstract

Today’s power generation sources are largely dependent on fossil fuels due to which the future sustainable development has become a challenge. A significant amount of the pollutant emissions such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide from the power sector is related to the use of fossil fuels for power generation. As the demand for electricity is growing rapidly, emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants from this sector can be expected to increase unless other alternatives are made available. Among the energy sources that can substitute fossil fuels, biomass fuels appear as one of the options with a high worldwide potential. In the Punjab region of India, Fluidized-bed combustion technology is being used for converting biomass into thermal energy and power generation in various small scale units. The investigation of biomass-based plant through experimental activities and numerical simulation is the scope of this study. The investigations were done at Captive Power Plant (CPP), Ambuja Cement Limited, a project of Holcim, District Ropar, India. During experimental investigations, the study of bed temperatures and steam temperatures at different zones has been done for coal fired and biomass fired combustors with 30% share. No clear effects of co-firing on boiler performance are observed. However, the operational behavior of the boiler in terms of bed temperature and stack emissions shows a different trend. During simulation, the contours of temperature have been obtained for both the boilers and the trends are found in agreement with real process.

Keywords

CFD biomass fluidized bed combustion 

References

  1. Agraniotis M, Stamatis D, Grammelis P and Kakaras E 2010 Dry lignite cofiring in a greek utility boiler: Experimental activities and numerical simulations. Energy Fuels 24: 5464–5473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Demires A 2005 Biomass co-firing for boilers associated with environmental impacts. Energy Sources 27: 1385–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FLUENT user’s guide 2006 vols. 1–2. LebanonGoogle Scholar
  4. Gustavasson M and Almstedt A E 2000 Numerical simulation of fluid dynamics in fluidized beds with horizontal heat exchanger tubes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55: 857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamzehei M, Rahimzadeh H and Ahmadi G 2010 Computational and experimental study of heat transfer and hydrodynamics in 2d gas-solid fluidized bed reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. 49: 5110–5121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirsch C 2007 Numerical computation of internal and external flows. USA: Butterworth–HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  7. Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment (INCCA) 2010 India Greenhouse gas emissions 2007, Ministry of Environment & Forests, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaur G, Singh J and Sood A 2006 Power generation potential from crop biomass in Punjab. Agri. Eng. Today 30: 5–6Google Scholar
  9. Kuipers J A M, Prins W and Van Swaaij W P M 1992 Numerical calculation of wall to bed heat transfer coefficients in gas-fluidized beds. AIChE J. 38: 1079–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Madhiyanon T, Sathitruangsak P and Soponronnarit S 2009 Co-combustion of rice husk with coal in a cyclonic fluidized bed combustor. Fuel 88: 132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Natrajan E, Nordin A and Rao A N 1998 Overview of combustion and gasification of rice husk in fluidized bed reactors. Biomass Bioenergy 14: 533–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ravelli S, Perdichizzi A and Barigozzi G 2008 Description, applications and numerical modeling of bubbling fluidized bed combustion in waste-to-energy plants. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 34: 224–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rozainee M, Ngo S P, Salema A A and Tan K G 2010 Computational fluid dynamics modeling of rice husk combustion, in a fluidized bed combustor. Powder Technol. 203: 331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sathitruangsak P, Madhiyanon T and Soponronnarit S 2009 Rice husk co-firing with coal in a short combustion chamber fluidized bed combustor (SFBC). Fuel 88: 1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt A and Renz U 1999 Eulerian computation of heat transfer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54: 5515–5522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh R I, Mohapatra S K and Gangacharyulu D 2009 CFD analysis of bubbling fluidized bed combustion using rice husk. Proceedings of 20th international conference on FBC 6: 857–863Google Scholar
  17. Singh R I, Brink A and Hupa M 2013 CFD modeling to study fluidized bed combustion and gasification. App. Thermal Eng. 52: 585–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun P, Hui S, Gao Z, Zhou Q, Tan H, Zhao Q and Xu T 2013 Experimental investigation on the combustion and heat transfer characteristics of wide size biomass co-firing in 0.2 MW circulating fluidized bed. App. Thermal Eng. 52: 284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walsh A R 2006 7th European conference on industrial furnaces and boilers, Porto, Portugal, 1–11Google Scholar
  20. Wankhede U S and Adgulkar D D 2008 CFD simulations of heat transfer in a bubbling fluidized bed for different materials. Emerg. Trends in Eng. Technol.: 1094–1098Google Scholar
  21. Werther J, Saenger M, Hartge E U, Ogada T and Siagi Z 2000 Combustion of agricultural residues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • HEMANT KUMAR
    • 1
  • S K MOHAPATRA
    • 2
  • RAVI INDER SINGH
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPunjabi UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology and SciencePilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations