, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 1035–1053 | Cite as

Optimization of surface integrity in dry hard turning using RSM

  • SUHA K SHIHABEmail author


This paper investigates the effect of different cutting parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut) on surface integrity defined in terms of surface roughness and microhardness in dry hard turning process. The workpiece material used was hardened alloy steel AISI 52100 and it was machined on a CNC lathe with coated carbide tool under different settings of cutting parameters. Three cutting parameters each at three levels were considered in the study. Central composite design (CCD) of experiment was used to collect experimental data for surface roughness and microhardness. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine significance of the cutting parameters. The results were analysed using an effective procedure of response surface methodology (RSM) to determine optimal values of cutting parameters. Several diagnostic tests were also performed to check the validity of assumptions. The results indicated that feed rate is the dominant factor affecting the surface roughness whereas the cutting speed is found to be the dominant factor affecting the microhardness. Results also revealed that within the range investigated, good surface integrity is achieved when feed rate and depth of cut are near their low levels and cutting speed is at high level. Finally, the optimal cutting parameters and model equations to predict the surface roughness and microhardness are proposed.


Hard turning surface roughness microhardness RSM 


  1. Aslan E, Camuscu N and Birgoren B 2007 Design optimization of cutting parameters when turning hardened AISI 4140 steel (63 HRC) with Al2O3 + TiCN mixed ceramic tool. Mater. Des. 28: 1618–1622Google Scholar
  2. Aouici H, Yallese M A, Fnides B, Chaoui K and Mabrouki T 2011 Modeling and optimization of hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 steel with CBN tool Machining parameters effects on flank wear and surface roughness. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 25: 2843–2851Google Scholar
  3. Benga G C and Abrao A M 2003 Turning of hardened 100Cr6 bearing steel with ceramic and PCBN cutting tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 143–144: 237–241Google Scholar
  4. Bouacha K, Yallese M A, Mabrouki T and Rigal J -F 2010 Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 28: 349–361Google Scholar
  5. Davim J P and Figueira L 2007 Machinability evaluation in hard turning of cold work tool steel (D2) with ceramic tools using statistical techniques. Mater. Des. 28: 1186–1191Google Scholar
  6. Dhar N R, Paul S and Chattopadhyay A B 2002 The influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear, dimensional accuracy and surface finish in turning AISI 1040 and E4340C steels. Wear 249: 932– 942Google Scholar
  7. Diniz A E and Oliveira A J 2004 Optimizing the use of dry cutting in rough turning steel operations. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 44: 1061–1067Google Scholar
  8. Diniz A E, Ferreira J R and Filho F T 2003 Influence of refrigeration/lubrication condition on SAE 52100 hardened steel turning at several cutting speeds. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43: 317–326Google Scholar
  9. Ezugwu E O, Silva R B, Da Bonney J and Machado A R 2005 Evaluation of the performance of CBN tools when turning Ti–6Al–4V alloy with high pressure coolant supplies. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 45: 1009–1014Google Scholar
  10. Gaitonde V N, Karnik S R, Figueira L and Davim J P 2009 Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 27: 754–763Google Scholar
  11. Goel P, Khan Z A, Siddiquee A N and Gupta R K 2012 Influence of Slab Milling Process Parameters on Surface Integrity of HSLA: A Multi-performance characteristics optimization. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 61: 859–871Google Scholar
  12. Grzesik W and Wanat T 2006 Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 46: 1988–1995Google Scholar
  13. Isik Y 2007 Investigating the machinability of tool steels in turning operations. Mater. Des. 28: 1417–1424Google Scholar
  14. Khamel S, Ouelaa N and Bouacha K 2012 Analysis and prediction of tool wear, surface roughness and cutting forces in hard turning with CBN tool. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26: 3605–3616Google Scholar
  15. Khan M M A, Mithu M A H and Dhar N R 2009 Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209: 5573–5583Google Scholar
  16. Krishna P V, Srikant R R and Rao D N 2010 Experimental investigation on the performance of nanoboric acid suspensions in SAE-40 and coconut oil during turning of AISI 1040 steel. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 50: 911–916Google Scholar
  17. Krishnaiah K 2012 Applied design of experiments and Taguchi methods, New Delhi, A. K. Ghosh, PHI Learning Private LimitedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar A S and Durai A R 2003 Machinability of hardened steel using alumina based ceramic cutting tools. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 21: 109–117Google Scholar
  19. Kumar C H R V and Ramamoorthy B 2007 Performance of coated tools during hard turning under minimum fluid application. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 185: 210–216Google Scholar
  20. Manna A and Salodkar S 2008 Optimization of machining conditions for effective turning of E0300 alloy steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 203: 147–153Google Scholar
  21. Montgomery D C 2010 Design and analysis of experiments. 7th edition, Delhi, John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  22. Morea A S, Jiang W, Brown W D and Malshe A P 2006 Tool wear and machining performance of cBN–TiN coated carbide inserts and PCBN compact inserts in turning AISI 4340 hardened steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 180: 253–262Google Scholar
  23. Paiva A P, Paiva E J, Ferreira J R, Balestrassi P P and Costa S C 2009 A multivariate mean square error optimization of AISI 52100 hardened steel turning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 43: 631–643Google Scholar
  24. Panneerselvam R 2012 Design and analysis of experiments, New Delhi, A. K. Ghosh, PHI Learning Private LimitedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramesh A, Melkote S N, Allard L F and Riester L 2005 Analysis of white layers formed in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. 390: 88–97Google Scholar
  26. Risbood K A, Dixit U S and Sahasrabudhe A D 2003 Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation by measuring cutting forces and vibrations in turning process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 132: 203–214Google Scholar
  27. Sahin Y and Motorcu A R 2008 Surface roughness model in machining hardened steel with cubic boron nitride cutting tool. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 26: 84–90Google Scholar
  28. Saini S, Ahuja I S and Sharma V S 2012 Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 tool steel using ceramic tools. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manufact. 13: 1295–1302Google Scholar
  29. Sharma V S, Dhiman S, Sehgal R and Sharma S K 2008 Estimation of cutting forces and surface roughness for hard turning using neural networks. J. Intell. Manuf. 19: 473–483Google Scholar
  30. Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Gaitonde V N and Samuel G L 2012 Machinability investigations on hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide insert. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 33: 75–86Google Scholar
  31. Thakur D G, Ramamoorthy B and Vijayaraghavan L 2009 Study on the machinability characteristics of superalloy Inconel 718 during high speed turning. Mater. Des. 30: 1718–1725Google Scholar
  32. Thiele J D and Melkote S N 1999 Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 94: 216–226Google Scholar
  33. Trent E M and Wright P K 2000 Metal Cutting, Fourth Edition, Butterworth–Heinemann, Boston, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  34. Tzeng C -J, Lin Y -H, Yang Y -K and Jeng M -C 2009 Optimization of turning operations with multiple performance characteristics using the Taguchi method and Grey relational analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209: 2753–2759Google Scholar
  35. Umbrello D, Ambrogio G, Filice L and Shivpuri R 2008 A hybrid finite element method–artificial neural network approach for predicting residual stresses and the optimal cutting conditions during hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel. Mater. Des. 29: 873–883Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

    • 1
    Email author
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJamia Millia Islamia (A Central University)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations