On approximation of Lie groups by discrete subgroups
- 173 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
A locally compact group G is said to be approximated by discrete subgroups (in the sense of Tôyama) if there is a sequence of discrete subgroups of G that converges to G in the Chabauty topology (or equivalently, in the Vietoris topology). The notion of approximation of Lie groups by discrete subgroups was introduced by Tôyama in Kodai Math. Sem. Rep. 1 (1949) 36–37 and investigated in detail by Kuranishi in Nagoya Math. J. 2 (1951) 63–71. It is known as a theorem of Tôyama that any connected Lie group approximated by discrete subgroups is nilpotent. The converse, in general, does not hold. For example, a connected simply connected nilpotent Lie group is approximated by discrete subgroups if and only if G has a rational structure. On the other hand, if Γ is a discrete uniform subgroup of a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group G then G is approximated by discrete subgroups Γ n containing Γ. The proof of the above result is by induction on the dimension of G, and gives an algorithm for inductively determining Γ n . The purpose of this paper is to give another proof in which we present an explicit formula for the sequence (Γ n ) n ≥ 0 in terms of Γ. Several applications are given.
Keywords
Nilpotent Lie group rational structure discrete uniform subgroup lattice subgroup Chabauty topology Vietoris topology1991 Mathematics Subject Classification
22E40Notes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referee for the helpful comments and suggestions which improved this paper, in particular for shortening the proof of Lemma 4.4. The second author is supported by laboratory mathematical physics, special functions and applications: LR11.ES35, University of Sousse.
References
- [1]Benedetti R and Petronio C, Lectures on hyperbolic geometry (1992) (Berlin: Springer)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [2]Bernat P et al, Représentations des groupes de Lie résolubles (1972) (Paris: Dunod)MATHGoogle Scholar
- [3]Bourbaki N, Éléments de Mathématique, Intégration, Chapitres 7–8 (2007) (Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
- [4]Bridson M R, De La Harpe P and Kleptsyn V, The Chabauty space of closed subgroups of the three-dimensional Heisenberg group, Pacific J. Math. 240 (2009) 1–48CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [5]Chabauty C, Limite d’ensemble et géométrie des nombres, Bull. Soc. Math. France 78 (1950) 143–151MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [6]Chatterjee P, On surjectivity of the power maps of solvable Lie groups, J. Algebra 248 (2002) 669–687CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [7]Corwin L and Greenleaf F P, Representations of nilpotent Lie groups and their applications, Part 1: Basic theory and examples, Cambridge Studies in Adv. Math. (1989) (New York: Cambridge University Press) vol 18Google Scholar
- [8]Corwin L and Greenleaf F P, Character formulas and spectra of compact nilmanifolds, J. Func. Analysis 21 (1976) 123–154CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [9]Dixmier J, L’application exponentielle dans les groupes de Lie résolubles, Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957) 113–121MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [10]Ernest M, Topologies on spaces of subsets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1951) 152–182CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [11]Fell J M G, A Hausdorff topology for the closed subsets of a locally compact non-Hausdorff space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (1962) 472–476CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [12]Guivarc’H Y and Rémy B, Group theoretic compactification of Bruhat-Tits buildings, Ann. Scient. Éc. Norm. Sup. 39 (2006) 871–920MATHGoogle Scholar
- [13]Kuranishi M, On everywhere dense imbedding of free groups in Lie groups, Nagoya Math. J. 2 (1951) 63–71MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [14]Leptin H and Ludwig J, Unitary representation theory of exponentiel Lie groups, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics (1994) vol. 18Google Scholar
- [15]Macias-Virgos E, Sous-groupes denses des groupes de Lie nilpotent, Ill. J. Math. 35 (1991) 607–617MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [16]Malcev A I, On a class of homogeneous spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 39 (1951)Google Scholar
- [17]Matsushima Y, On the discrete subgroups and homogeneous spaces of nilpotent Lie groups, Nagoya Math. J. 2 (1951) 95–110MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [18]Moore C C, Decomposition of unitary representations defined by discrete subgroups of nilpotent groups, Ann. Math. 82 (1965) 146–182CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [19]Narens L, Topolgies of closed subsets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 174 (1972) 55–76CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [20]Onishchik A L and Vinberg E B, Lie groups and Lie algebra II, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 21 (2000) (Berlin: Springer)Google Scholar
- [21]Raghunathan M S, Discrete subgroups of Lie groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik, Bd. 68 (1972) (New York: Springer)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [22]Thomas H, Compactification de Chabauty des espaces symétriques de type non compact, J. Lie Theory 20 (2010) 437–468MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [23]Thurston W, The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds (1997) (Princeton University Press) vol. 1Google Scholar
- [24]Tôyama H, On discrete subgroups of a Lie group, Kodai Math. Sem. Rep. 1 (1949) 36–37CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [25]Varadarajan V S, Lie groups, Lie algebras and their representations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 102Google Scholar
- [26]Wang S P, On the limit of subgroups in a group, Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970) 708–724CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [27]Wang S P, On subgroups with property (P) and maximal discrete subgroups, Amer. J. Math. 97 (1975) 404–414CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [28]Witte D, Superrigidity of lattices in solvanle Lie group, Invent. Math. 122 (1995) 147–193CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar