Pramana

, 90:13 | Cite as

Study of chaos in chaotic satellite systems

Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we study the qualitative behaviour of satellite systems using bifurcation diagrams, Poincaré section, Lyapunov exponents, dissipation, equilibrium points, Kaplan–Yorke dimension etc. Bifurcation diagrams with respect to the known parameters of satellite systems are analysed. Poincaré sections with different sowing axes of the satellite are drawn. Eigenvalues of Jacobian matrices for the satellite system at different equilibrium points are calculated to justify the unstable regions. Lyapunov exponents are estimated. From these studies, chaos in satellite system has been established. Solution of equations of motion of the satellite system are drawn in the form of three-dimensional, two-dimensional and time series phase portraits. Phase portraits and time series display the chaotic nature of the considered system.

Keywords

Bifurcation diagram Poincaré section map Lyapunov exponents perturbed satellite systems 

PACS Nos

05.45.Gg 05.45.Tp 05.45.Vx 05.45.Pq 

References

  1. 1.
    G R Duan and H H Yu, LMI in control systems analysis, design and applications (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S Djaouida, Int. J. Mech. Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic Manufacturing Eng. 8, 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D Sadaoui et al, Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9041 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A Khan and Shikha,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-017-1385-0, Pramana – J. Phys. (2017)
  5. 5.
    A Khan, D Khattar and N Prajapati,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1356-x, Pramana – J. Phys. (2017)
  6. 6.
    A Khan and M A Bhat,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-016-0274-6, Int. J. Dyn. Control (2016)
  7. 7.
    L M Pecora and T L Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T L Carroll and L M Pecora, IEEE Trans. CAS I 38, 435 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P Grassberger and I Procaccia, Physica D 9, 189 (1983)ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L M Saha, M K Das and M Budhraja, FORMA 21, 151 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G Litak, A Syta, M Budhraja and L M Saha, Chaos Solitons Fractals 42, 1511 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A P M Tsui and A J Jones, Physica D 135, 41 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J Kuang and S H Tan, J. Sound Vib. 235(2), 175 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J Kuang, S Tan, K Arichandran and A Y T Leung, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 36, 1213 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L Y Kong, F Q Zhoul and I Zou, The control of chaotic attitude motion of a perturbed spacecraft, in: Proceedings of the 25th Chinese Control Conference, Vol. 711 (Harbin, Heilongjiang, Augusth, 2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stephen Lynch, Dynamical systems with applications using mathematica (Birkhuser, Berlin, Boston, 2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M J Sidi, Spacecraft dynamics and control: A practical engineering approach (Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R W Zhang, Satellite orbit and attitude dynamics and control (in Chinese) (Beihang University Press, Beijing, China, 1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T Liu and J Zhao, Dynamics of spacecraft (in Chinese) (Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin, China, 2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L L Show, J C Juang and Y W Jan, IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol. 11(1), 73 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W MacKunis, K Dupree, S Bhasin and W E Dixon, Adaptive neural network satellite attitude control in the presence of inertia and CMG actuator uncertainties, in: American Control Conference (Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA, June 11–13, 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural SciencesJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations