Solitons, compactons and undular bores in Benjamin–Bona–Mahony-like systems
- 99 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
We examine the effect of dissipation on travelling waves in nonlinear dispersive systems modelled by Benjamin–Bona–Mahony (BBM)-like equations. In the absence of dissipation, the BBM-like equations are found to support soliton and compacton /anticompacton solutions depending on whether the dispersive term is linear or nonlinear. We study the influence of increasing nonlinearity of the medium on the soliton and compacton dynamics. The dissipative effect is found to convert the solitons either to undular bores or to shock-like waves depending on the degree of nonlinearity of the equations. The anticompacton solutions are also transformed to undular bores by the effect of dissipation. But the compactons tend to vanish due to viscous effects. The local oscillatory structures behind the bores and /or shock-like waves in the case of solitons and anticompactons are found to depend sensitively both on the coefficient of viscosity and solution of the unperturbed problem.
Keywords
Benjamin–Bona–Mahony-like equations travelling wave solutions solitons compactons dissipation undular bores shock wavesPACS Nos
02.30.Gp 02.30.Hq 02.30.JrNotes
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Drs Sk Golam Ali and Amitava Choudhuri for their kind interest in this work.
References
- [1]D H Peregrine, J. Fluid Mech. 27, 815 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]T B Benjamin, J L Bona and J J Mahony, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 272, 47 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]S Yandong, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 25, 1083 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]L Wang, J Zhou and L Ren, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 1, 58 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [5]P Rosenau and J N Hyman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 564 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]S C Mancas, G Spradlin and H Khanal, J. Math. Phys. 54, 081502 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]G A El, R H J Grimshaw and A M Kamchatnov, Chaos 15, 037102 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]T B Benjamin and M J Lighthill, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 224, 448 (1954)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]A V Gurevich and L P Pitaevskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 590 (1973) Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 291 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [10]L Zhang and A Chen, Proc. Rom. Acad. Ser. A 15, 11 (2014)Google Scholar
- [11]P Razborova, L Moraru and A Biswas, Rom. J. Phys. 59, 658 (2014)Google Scholar
- [12]R Abazari, Rom. Rep. Phys. 66, 286 (2014)Google Scholar
- [13]A Biswas, Nonlin. Dynam. 59, 423 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]P Sanchez, Rom. J. Phys. 60, 379 (2015)Google Scholar
- [15]K T Alligood, T Sauer and J A Yorke, Chaos: An introduction to dynamical systems (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [16]E T Whittaker and G Watson, A course of modern analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
- [17]J B Scarborough, Numerical mathematical analysis (Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
- [18]P A Clarkson, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 3281 (1989) M S Bruzon and M L Gandarias, Int. J. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 4, 527 (2012) S C Mancas and H C Rosu, Phys. Lett. A 337, 1434 (2013)Google Scholar
- [19]P J Olver, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 85, 143 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]S Hamdi, B Morse, B Halphen and W Schiesser, Nat. Hazards 57, 609 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]J W Shen, W Su and W Li, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 27, 413 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]L Zhang and R Tang, Proc. Rom. Acad. Ser. A 16, 168 (2015)Google Scholar
- [23]A N Garazo and M G Velarde, Phys. Fluids A 3, 2295 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]H Triki, Rom. J. Phys. 59, 421 (2014)Google Scholar