Pramana

, Volume 84, Issue 1, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Stability analysis of fractional-order generalized chaotic susceptible–infected–recovered epidemic model and its synchronization using active control method

Article

Abstract

This paper presents the synchronization between a pair of identical susceptible–infected–recovered (SIR) epidemic chaotic systems and fractional-order time derivative using active control method. The fractional derivative is described in Caputo sense. Numerical simulation results show that the method is effective and reliable for synchronizing the fractional-order chaotic systems while it allows the system to remain in chaotic state. The striking features of this paper are: the successful presentation of the stability of the equilibrium state and the revelation that time for synchronization varies with the variation in fractional-order derivatives close to the standard one for different specified values of the parameters of the system.

Keywords

Susceptible–infected–recovered model fractional time derivative stability analysis chaos synchronization active control method 

PACS Nos

05.45.−a 05.45.Xt 05.45.Pq 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by TCS Research Scholar Programme, Tata Consultancy Services Limited, India. The authors are grateful to the revered reviewers for their pertinent suggestions which have immensely helped them to improve the presentation of this paper.

References

  1. [1]
    B Buonomo, A D’Onofrio and D Lacitignola, Math. Biosci. 216, 9 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A D’Onofrio, P Manfredi and E Salinelli, Theor. Popul. Biol. 71, 301 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A D’Onofrio, P Manfredi and E Salinelli, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 2, 23 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T K Kar and P K Mondal, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 12, 2058 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    L M Pecora and T L Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M C Ho and Y C Hung, Phys. Lett. A 301, 424 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J H Park, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 27, 549 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    U E Vincent, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, 13, 253 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S P Ansari and S Das, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., DOI:  10.1002/mma.3103
  10. [10]
    M T Yassen, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23, 131 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C G Li, X F Liao and J B Yu, Phys. Rev. E 68, 067203 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W H Deng and C P Li, Phys. A 353, 61 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    C P Li and J P Yan, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 32, 751 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J P Yan and C P Li, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 32, 725 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S K Agrawal and S Das, Nonlinear Dyn., DOI:  10.1007/s11071-013-0842-7
  16. [16]
    M Srivastava, S K Agrawal and S Das, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 13, 482 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M Srivastava, S P Ansari, S K Agrawal, S Das and A Y T Leung, Nonlinear Dyn., DOI:  10.1007/s11071-013-1177-0
  18. [18]
    S K Agrawal, M Srivastava and S Das, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 45, 737 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    D Matignon, Computat. Eng. Syst. App. Lille France 2, 963 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    E Ahmed, A M A El-Sayed and H A A El-Saka, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 325, 542 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    L O Chua, M Komuro and T Matsumoto, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 33, 10721118 (1986)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    C P Silva, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 40, 675682 (1993)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    D Cafagna and G Grassi, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 13, 2889 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J Lu, G Chen, X Yu and H Leung, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 51, 2476 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M S Tavazoei and M Haeri, Phys. Lett. A 367 102 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology (BHU)VaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations