Pramana

, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 719–726 | Cite as

Collisional effect on the Weibel instability in the limit of high plasma temperature

Article

Abstract

The Weibel instability (WI) of relativistic electron beam (REB) penetrating an infinite collisional plasma was studied in the following models: (i) REB model, where the total equilibrium distribution function f 0(\( \vec p \)) is approximated by nonrelativistic background electron and REB distribution functions and (ii) relativistic monoenergetic beam (RMB) model, where f 0(\( \vec p \)) is approximated by nonrelativistic background electrons and RMB distribution functions.

The dispersion equation including the effect of collision for a purely transverse mode describing each model was derived and solved analytically to obtain growth rates and conditions of excitation of the WI in the limit of high plasma temperature.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the effect of collision within the plasma on the growth rate of the WI for the two models. It was proved that the plasma collision frequency reduces the growth rate of WI at high plasma temperature. That is to say, collisions are inversely proportional to the growth rate. This leads to the important result: WI can be stabilized by increasing the plasma temperature.

Comparing the growth rate of WI in the two models (RMB and REB models), we came to the conclusion that growth rate of WI is more in the second case (REB case).

Keywords

Weibel instability (WI) relativistic electron beam (REB) relativistic monoenergetic beam (RMB) Krook collision term 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M Brambilla, Kinetic theory of plasma waves: Homogeneous plasma (Oxford Science Publications, New York, 1998)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J Vranjas, S Poedts and B P Pandey, Proc. of the 2007 ICTP Summer College on Plasma Phys. (Trieste, Italy, 30 July–24 August 2007)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    V P Krainov, Annual Moscow Workshop, Physics of Nonideal Plasmas (Moscow, 3–4 Dec. 2002)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T B Yang, J Arons and A B Langdon, Phys. Plasmas 1, 3059 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K Nishikawa, International Workshop on Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion Flow and Jets (YIP, Kyote, 25–27 Jan. 2005)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A Sid, A Ghzal, A Soudani and M Bekhouche, Plasma and Fusion Research 5, 007 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R Lee and M Lampe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1390 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    B Shokri and M Ghorbanalilu, Phys. Plasmas 11, 5398 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R L Morse and C W Nielson, Phys. Fluids 14, 830 (1971)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    N A Krall, and A W Trivelpiece, Principles of plasma physics (McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 1973)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    F F Cap, Handbook on plasma instabilities (Academic Press, New York, 1978) Vol. 2Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R C Davidson and D A Hammer, Phys. Fluids 15, 317 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    N G Zaki, Egypt. J. Phys. 32(1), 59 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A Bret and C Deutsch, Phys. Plasmas 12, 082109 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C Deutsh, A Bret and P Fromy, Laser and particle beams 23, 5 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    R C Davidson, Basic plasma physics: Selected chapters edited by A A Galeev and R N Sudan, Handbook of plasma physics edited by M N Rosenbluth and R Z Sagdeev (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1989)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    T Okada, T Yabe and K Niu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 43, 1042 (1977)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    K E Zayed and A B Kitsenko, Plasma Phys. 10, 673 (1968)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plasma Physics and Nuclear Fusion Department, Nuclear Research CentreAtomic Energy AuthorityAbo-ZaabalEgypt

Personalised recommendations