, 73:363 | Cite as

Particles versus fields in \( \mathcal{P}\mathcal{T} \)-symmetrically deformed integrable systems

  • Andreas FringEmail author


We review some recent results on how \( \mathcal{P}\mathcal{T} \) symmetry, that is a simultaneous time-reversal and parity transformation, can be used to construct new integrable models. Some complex valued multi-particle systems, such as deformations of the Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models, are shown to arise naturally from real valued field equations of nonlinear integrable systems. Deformations of complex non-linear integrable field equations, some of them even allowing for compacton solutions, are also investigated. The integrabilty of various systems is established by means of the Painlevé test.


Korteweg-de Vries equation Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models Painlevé property \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\) symmetry compactons 


02.60.Lj 02.30.Ik 03.65.Ge 03.50.-z 11.30.Er 


  1. [1]
    C M Bender and S Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    T Hollowood, Nucl. Phys. B384, 523 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L Faddeev and O Tirkkonen, Nucl. Phys. B453, 647 (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G von Gehlen, J. Phys. A24, 5371 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C Figueira de Morisson Faria and A Fring, Laser Phys. 17, 424 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C M Bender, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A Mostafazadeh, arXiv:0810.5643Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P Assis and A Fring, J. Phys. A41, 244002 (2008); J. Phys. A41, 392004 (2008)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    F G Scholtz, H B Geyer and F J W Hahne, Ann. Phys. 213, 74 (1992)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A Fring, J. Phys. A40, 4215 (2007)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    B Bagchi and A Fring, J. Phys. A41, 392004 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H H Chen, Y C Lee and N R Pereira, Phys. Fluids 22, 187 (1979)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J Feinberg, talk at PHHQP Workshop VI, London, 2007Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T Benjamin, J. Fluid Mech. 29, 559 (1967) H Ono, J. Phys. Jpn 39, 1082 (1975)zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    H Airault, H P McKean and J Moser, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 30, 95 (1977)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    P Assis, A Fring and M Smith, arXiv:0907.1049Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    B Basu-Mallick and A Kundu, Phys. Rev. B62, 9927 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A Fring, Mod. Phys. Lett. A21, 691 (2006)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A Fring and M Znojil, J. Phys. A41, 194010 (2008)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    C Bender, D C Brody, J Chen and E Furlan, J. Phys. A40, F153 (2007)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J Weiss, M Tabor and G Carnevale, J. Math. Phys. 24, 522 (1983)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    P Assis and A Fring, J. Phys. A42, 105206 (2009)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    C Bender, F Cooper, A Khare, B Mihaila and A Saxena, arXiv:0810.3460Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    F Cooper and A Khare, Phys. Rev. E48, 4843 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    P Assis and A Fring, arXiv:0901.1267Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Mathematical ScienceCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations