Advertisement

Genomic Diversity of Three Brazilian Native Food Crops Based on Double-Digest Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing

  • Alessandro Alves-Pereira
  • Mariana Novello
  • Gabriel Dequigiovanni
  • José Baldin Pinheiro
  • Pedro H. S. Brancalion
  • Elizabeth Ann Veasey
  • Charles R. Clement
  • Anete Pereira de Souza
  • Maria Imaculada ZucchiEmail author
Article

Abstract

The megabiodiversity of Brazil created opportunities for the domestication of a number of crop species, including some of major global importance. Considering the economic value of many Brazilian native crops, the genetic characterization of their populations is fundamental to support the utilization and conservation of their genetic resources, currently threatened by deforestation and the intensification of monuculture of exotic crops. Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies have promoted the rapid genomic evaluation of non-model species, including those of only local importance. In this context, we evaluated the genomic diversity of three native Brazilian crops: manioc (Manihot esculenta), annatto (Bixa orellana) and the juçara palm (Euterpe edulis). Double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD) was employed to identify thousands of SNP markers in each crop species (1952 in manioc, 3362 in annatto and 1040 in juçara). Population genomic analyses identified many loci putatively under selection, but the unavailability of genome sequences for annatto and juçara hampers further characterization for these crops. Nonetheless, the SNP markers identified were effective in the characterization of the genomic diversity and population structure. The levels of genomic diversity and inbreeding were compatible with the biology of each species. While wild and cultivated manioc were remarkably genetically divergent, the same was not observed between accessions of wild and cultivated annatto, and genetic differentiation was observed among juçara samples from different environments. The application of population genomic approaches may be valuable for the establishment of better practices of management of these crops, promoting the conservation and valorization of Brazilian native genetic resources.

Keywords

Bixa orellana Euterpe edulis Manihot esculenta Population genomics SNP 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – BioComputacional 051/2013), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP – 2012/08307-5, 2013/00003-0). AA-P thanks CAPES and FAPESP (2018/00036-9) for post-doctoral scholarships. MN (2013/17354-0) and GD (2013/08884-5) thank FAPESP for doctoral scholarships. MIZ, JBP, CRC, PHSB and APS thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for research fellowships and a post-doctoral scholarship (grant # 150297/2018-1) of GD. The authors thank Danilo Augusto Sforça and Aline C.L. Moraes for laboratory assistance.

Author Contributions

AA-P, MN, GD, APS and MIZ designed the research. AA-P, MN, GD, PHSB, EAV, and CRC performed sample collections. AA-P, MN and GD prepared the ddRAD genomic libraries. AA-P, MN, GD, JBP, EAV, PHSB, CRC and MIZ performed analyses and discussed results. All coauthors prepared the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12042_2019_9229_MOESM1_ESM.docx (461 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 461 kb)

References

  1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S (2008) Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl 1(1):95–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Allem AC (2002) The origins and taxonomy of cassava. In: Hillocks RJ, Thresh JM, Bellotti AC (eds) Cassava: biology, production and utilization. CAB International, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart GH (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11:697–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allendorf FW, Luikart GH, Aitken SN (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Oxford Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida E, Pinheiro A (1992) Biologia floral e mecanismo de reprodução em urucuzeiro (Bixa orellana L.) I. tipo “fruto verde piloso”. In: Reunião técnico científica sobre melhoramento genético do urucuzeiro. Embrapa – CEPATU, BelémGoogle Scholar
  6. Alves-Pereira A, Peroni N, Abreu AG, Gribel R, Clement CR (2011) Genetic structure of traditional varieties of bitter manioc in three soils in Central Amazonia. Genetica 139:1259–1271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Alves-Pereira A, Clement CR, Picanço-Rodrigues D, Veasey EA, Dequigiovanni G, Ramos SLF, Pinheiro JB, Zucchi MI (2018) Patterns of nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity and structure of manioc along major Brazilian Amazonian rivers. Ann Bot 121(4):625–639.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx190 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews KR, Good JM, Miller MR, Luikart G, Hohenlohe PA (2016) Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet 17:81–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) Lositan: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9:323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrett RDH, Hoekstra HE (2011) Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nat Rev Genet 12(11):767–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. P Roy Soc Lond 263:1619–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bevan MW, Uauy C (2013) Genomics reveals new landscapes for crop improvement. Genome Biol 14(6):206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonierbale M, Roa AC, Maya MM, Duque MC, Thome J (1997) Assessment of genetic diversity in Manihot species with AFLPs. African J Root Tuber Crops 2:139Google Scholar
  15. Bragg JG, Megan AS, Andrew RL, Borevitz JO (2015) Genomic variation across landscapes: insights and applications. New Phytol 207(4):953–967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brancalion PHS, Vidal E, Lavorenti NA, Batista JLF, Rodrigues RR (2012) Soil-mediated effects on potential Euterpe edulis (Arecaceae) fruit and palm heart sustainable management in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Forest Ecol Manag 284:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bredeson JV et al (2016) Sequencing wild and cultivated cassava and related species reveals extensive interspecific hybridization and genetic diversity. Nat Biotechnol 34(5):562–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brozynska M, Omar ES, Furtado A, Crayn D, Simon B, Ishikawa R, Henry RJ (2014) Chloroplast genome of novel rice germoplasm identified in northern Australia. Trop Plant Biol 7(3–4):111–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Brozynska M, Furtado A, Henry RJ (2016) Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J 14(4):1070–1085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Carvalho JFRP, Robinson IP, Alfenas AC (2005) Isozymic variability in a Brazilian collection of annatto (Bixa orellana L.). Pesqui Agropecu Bras 40(7):653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH (2011) Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 (Bethesda) 1(3):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Catchen JM, Hohenlohe P, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22(11):3124–3140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Clement CR (1999) 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Econ Bot 53(2):188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clement CR, Cristo-Araújo M, d’Eeckenbrugge GC, Alves-Pereira A, Picanço-Rodrigues D (2010) Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2:72–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R, 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15):2156–2158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dequigiovanni G, Ramos SLF, Zucchi MI, Bajay MM, Pinheiro JB, Fabri EG, Bressan EA, Veasey EA (2014) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for Bixa orellana, an important source of natural dyes. Genet Mol Res 13(4):9097–1002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dequigiovanni G, Ramos SLF, Alves-Pereira A, Fabri EG, Carvalho PRN, Silva MG, Abdo MTVN, Martins ALM, Clement CR, Veasey EA (2017) Genetic diversity and structure in a major Brazilian annatto (Bixa orellana) germplasm bank revealed by microsatellites and biochemical traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64:1775–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Donkin RA (1974) Bixa orellana: the eternal shrub. Anthropos 69:33–56Google Scholar
  30. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bull 12:11–15Google Scholar
  31. Elias M, Mühlen GS, McKey D, Roa AC, Tohme J (2004) Genetic diversity of traditional South American landraces of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): an analysis using microsatellites. Econ Bot 58(2):242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM, Hohenlohe PA, Cresko WA, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM (2010) Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(37):16196–16200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fraser JA, Clement CR (2008) Dark earths and manioc cultivation in Central Amazonia: a window on pre-Columbian agricultural systems? Bol Mus Par Emilio Goeldi 3(2):175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeland JR, Kirk H, Petersen S (2011) Molecular ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fuller DQ (2007) Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Ann Bot 100:903–924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaiotto FA, Grattapaglia D, Vencovsky R (2003) Genetic structure, mating system, and long-distance gene flow in heart of palm (Euterpe edulis Mart.). J Heredity 94(5):399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galetti M, Guevara R, Côrtes MC, Fadini R, Matter SV et al (2013) Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science 340(6136):1086–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gepts P (2004) Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. Plant Breed Rev 24:1–44Google Scholar
  39. Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talon M, Dopazo J, Conesa A (2008) High- throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blsat2Go suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36(10):3420–3435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Goudet J (2004) Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE (2012) Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS One 7(9):e45170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamblin MT, Warburton ML, Buckler ES (2007) Empirical comparison of simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms in assessment of maize diversity and relatedness. PLoS One 2(12):e1367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Henderson A, Galeano G, Bernal R (1995) Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoffmann AA, Willi Y (2008) Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nat Rev Genet 9(6):421–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Etter PD, Stiffler N, Johnson EA, Cresko WA (2010) Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet 6(2):e1000862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) Adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grunwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Keenan K, McGinnity P, Cross TF, Crozier WW, Prodöhl PA (2013) diveRsity: an R package for the estimation of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol Evol 4(8):782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kess T, Gross J, Harper F, Boulding EG (2015) Low-cost ddRAD method of SNP discovery and genotyping applied to the periwinkle Littorina saxatilis. J Molluscan Stud 82(1):104–109Google Scholar
  51. Kohn MH, Murphy WJ, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK (2006) Genomics and conservation genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 21(11):629–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ladizinsky G (1998) Plant evolution under domestication. Kluwer Academic, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Langmead B, Salzberg S (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Lebot V (2009) Tropical root and tuber crops: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids. Crop production science in horticulture (17). CAB books, CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Li H (2011) A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27(21):2987–2993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan S, Taberlet P (2003) The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat Rev Genet 4(12):981–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Macher J-N, Rozenberg A, Pauls SU, Tollrian R, Wagner R, Leese F (2015) Assessing the phylogeographic history of the montane caddisfly Thremma gallicum using mitochondrial and restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) markers. Ecol Evol 5(3):648–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Mantovani A, Morellato LP (2000) Fenologia da floração, frutificação, mudança foliar e aspectos da biologia floral do palmiteiro. Sellowia 49:23–38Google Scholar
  60. McKey D, Beckerman S (1993) Chemical ecology, plant evolution and traditional Manioc cultivation systems. In: Hladik CM, Linares OF, Pagezy H, Semple A, Hadley M (eds) Tropical forests, people and food biocultural interactions and applications to development. Parthenon Carnforth and UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  61. McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputié A (2010) The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol 186(2):318–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputié A (2012) Ecological approaches to crop domestication. In: Gepts P, Famula TR, Bettinger R, Brush SB, Damania AB, McGuire PE, Qualset CO (eds) Biodiversity in agriculture: domestication, evolution and sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Mirante AS, Sampaio MJA, Inglis MCV (2009) The state of Brazil’s plant genetic resources: second national report: conservation and sustainable utilization for food and agriculture. Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  64. MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2002) Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. Biodiversidade Brasileira. Avaliação e identificação de áreas e ações prioritárias para conservação, utilização sustentável e repartição dos benefícios da biodiversidade nos biomas brasileiros. MMA/SBF, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  65. MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2008) Instrução Normativa n°6, de 23 de setembro de 2008. Espécies da flora brasileira ameaçadas de extinção. Diário oficial da união de 23 de Setembro de 2008. (Seção 1) http://www.ibama.gov.br/phocadownload/category/47-_?download=999%3A_06-2008.p. Cited 21 Mar 2015
  66. Monzote L, Montalvo AM, Almanonni S, Scull R, Miranda M, Abreu J (2006) Activity of the essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides grown in Cuba against Leishmania amazonensis. Chemotherapy 52:130–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Moreira PA, Lins J, Dequigiovanni G, Veasey EA, Clement CR (2015) The domestication of annatto (Bixa orellana) from Bixa urucurana in Amazonia. Econ Bot 69:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morin PA, Martien KK, Taylor BL (2009) Assessing statistical power of SNPs for population structure and conservation studies. Mol Ecol Resour 9:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Nass LL, Sigrist MS, Ribeiro CSC, Reifschneider JB (2012) Genetic resources: the basis for sustainable and competitive plant breeding. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 2:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ (2015) Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol Plant 8(1):68–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Novello M, Viana JPG, Alves-Pereira A, Silvestre EA, Nunes HF, Pinheiro JB, Brancalion PHS, Zucchi MI (2018) Genetic conservation of a threatened Neotropical palm through community-management of fruits in agroforest and second-growth forests. Forest Ecol Manag 407:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oliveira EJ, Ferreira CF, Santos VS, Jesus ON, Oliveira GAF, Silva MS (2014) Potential of SNP markers for the characterization of Brazilian cassava germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 127:1423–1440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Olsen KM, Schaal BA (1999) Evidence on the origin of cassava: Phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(10):5586–5591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Olsen KM, Schaal BA (2001) Microsatellite variation in cassava (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) and its wild relatives: further evidence for a southern Amazonian origin of domestication. Am J Bot 88(1):131–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Olsen KM, Wendel JF (2013) Crop plants as models for understanding plant adaptation and diversification. Front Plant Sci 4:290.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00290 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Orlande T, Laarman J, Mortimer J (1996) Palmito sustainability and economics in Brazil’s Atlantic coastal forest. Forest Ecol Manag 80:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peroni N, Kageyama P, Begossi A (2007) Molecular differentiation, diversity, and folk classification of “sweet” and “bitter” cassava (Manihot esculenta) in Caiçara and Caboclo management systems (Brazil). Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1333–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7:e37135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Prochnik S, Marri P, Desany B, Rabinowicz P, Kodira C, Mohiuddin M, Rodriguez F, Fauquet C, Tohme J, Harkins T, Rokhsar D, Rounsley S (2012) The cassava genome: current progress, future directions. Trop Plant Biol 5(1):88–94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  81. Reis MS, Fantini AC, Nodari RO, Reis A, Guerra MP, Mantovani A (2000) Management and conservation of natural populations in Atlantic rain forest: the case study of palm heart (Euterpe edulis Martius). Biotropica 32:894–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rival L, McKey D (2008) Domestication and diversity in manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz ssp. esculenta, Euphorbiaceae). Curr Anthropol 49(6):1119–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sandy-Cuen PM, Becerra R (2003) Manejo campesino de recursos naturales. El achiote. BioDiversitas 7:7–11Google Scholar
  84. Seeb JE, Carvalho G, Hauser L, Naish K, Roberts S, Seeb LW (2011) Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and applications of SNP genotyping in nonmodel organisms. Mol Ecol Resour 11(s1):1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Souza SEXF, Vidal E, Chagas GF, Elgar AT, Brancalion PHS (2016) Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48:868–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stölting KN, Nipper R, Lindtke D, Caseys C, Waeber S, Castiglione S, Lexer C (2013) Genomic scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms reveals patterns of divergence and gene flow between ecologically divergent species. Mol Ecol 22(3):842–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Valdez-Ojeda R, Quiros CF, de Lourdes Aguilar-Espinosa M et al (2010) Outcrossing rates in annatto determined by sequence-related amplified polymorphism. Agron J 102(5):1340–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27(9):522–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Vilares AS, São José AR, Rebouças TNH, Souza IVB (1992) Estudo da biologia floral de urucuzeiro (Bixa orellana L.). Rev Bras Corantes Naturais 1:101–105Google Scholar
  90. Willing E-M, Dreyer C, van Oosterhout C (2012) Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by FST do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Yang H, Tao Y, Zheng Z, Li C, Sweetingham MW, Howieson JG (2012) Application of next-generation sequencing for rapid marker development in molecular plant breeding: a case study on anthracnose disease resistance in Lupinus angustifolius L. BMC Genomics 13(318):1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Alves-Pereira
    • 1
  • Mariana Novello
    • 2
  • Gabriel Dequigiovanni
    • 3
  • José Baldin Pinheiro
    • 3
  • Pedro H. S. Brancalion
    • 4
  • Elizabeth Ann Veasey
    • 3
  • Charles R. Clement
    • 5
  • Anete Pereira de Souza
    • 1
  • Maria Imaculada Zucchi
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology, Institute of BiologyState University of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of BiologyState University of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Genetics, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of AgricultureUniversity of São PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Forest Sciences, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of AgricultureUniversity of São PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  5. 5.National Research Institute for AmazoniaManausBrazil
  6. 6.Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Polo Regional de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico do Centro SulPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations