Journal of Genetics

, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 1035–1038 | Cite as

Cytosine deletion at AP2-box region of HSP70 promoter and its influence on semen quality traits in crossbred bulls

  • RAJIB DEB
  • BASAVRAJ SAJJANAR
  • UMESH SINGH
  • SUSHIL KUMAR
  • GYANENDRA SINGH SENGAR
  • RANI ALEX
  • A. K. DAS
  • S. TYAGI
  • T. V. RAJA
  • R. R. ALYETHODI
  • RANI SINGH
  • V. BHANUPRAKASH
  • B. PRAKASH
RESEARCH NOTE

Keywords

AP2 box promoter HSP70 semen quality crossbred bulls 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Director, ICAR-CIRC for providing necessary facilities to conduct the work. We also acknowledge Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India, for providing financial support under the project YSS/2014/000279 to RD. We are also thankful to the Military Farm, Meerut, India, for providing the animals used in the present experiment.

References

  1. Box G. E. and Cox D. R. 1964 An analysis of transformations . J. Roy Stat. Soc. 26, 211–252.Google Scholar
  2. Deb R., Sajjanar B., Singh U., Kumar S., Brahmane M. P., Singh R. et al. 2013 Promoter variants at AP2 box region of HSP70.1 affect thermal stress response and milk production traits in Frieswal cross bred cattle. Gene 15, 230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Den Daas N. 1992 Laboratory assessment of semen characteristics. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 28, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gafer J. A., Abd El-Rahman G. H. and Rawash Z. M. 2015 Association of HSP70 gene polymorphism and bull semen quality in winter and summer seasons. Alexandria J. Vet. Sci. 46, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammersdtedt R. H., Graham J. K. and Nolan J. P. 1990 Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl. 11, 73–88.Google Scholar
  6. Hu J. H., Zhao X. L., Tian W. Q., Zan L. S. and Li Q. W. 2011 Effects of vitamin E supplementation in the extender on frozen-thawed bovine semen preservation. Animal 5, 107–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang S. Y., Kuo Y. H., Lee W. C., Tsou H. L., Lee Y. P., Chang H. L. et al. 1999 Substantial decrease of heat-shock protein 90 precedes the decline of sperm motility during cooling of boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 51, 1007–1016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamaruddin M., Kroetsch T., Basrur P. K. and King W. A. 1996 Heat shock protein 70 in bovine semen. Biol. Reprod. 54, 222.Google Scholar
  9. Kumar S., Deb R., Singh U., Ganguly I., Mandal D. K., Singh R. et al. 2014 SNPs at exonic region of Aquaporin-7 (AQP-7) gene may effects semen quality parameters among crossbred bulls . J. Genet. 93, Online Resources. e108–e112.Google Scholar
  10. Kumar S., Deb R., Singh U., Ganguly I., Mandal D. K., Singh R. et al. 2015a Bovine circadian locomotor output cyclic kaput (CLOCK) and cluster in (CLU) mRNA quantitation in ejaculated crossbred bull spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim., doi: 10.1111/rda.12522.
  11. Kumar S., Singh U., Deb R., Tyagi S., Mandal D. K., Kumar M. et al. 2015b A SNP (g.358A >T) at intronic region of CD9 molecule of crossbred bulls may associate with spermatozoal motility. Meta Gene, (doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.07.004).
  12. Kumar S., Singh U., Ganguly I., Deb R., Singh R., Mann S. et al. 2015c Protamine 3 expressions in crossbred bull spermatozoa may not be a prognostic marker for differentiating good and poor quality semen. African J. Biotechnol. 13, 20.Google Scholar
  13. Kuo Y. H., Huang S. Y. and Lee Y. P. 1997 Effects of breed and season on semen characteristics of boars in subtropical area . J. Chin. Soc. Vet. Sci. 23, 114–122.Google Scholar
  14. Leung S. M., Senisterra G., Ritchie K. P., Sadis S. E., Lepock J. R. and Hightower L. E. 1996 Thermal activation of the bovine HSC70 molecular chaperone at physiological temperatures: physical evidence of a molecular thermometer. Cell Stress. Chaperon. 1, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nascimento J. M., Shi L. Z., Tam J., Chandsawangbhuwana C., Durrant B., Botvinick E. L. et al. 2008 Comparison of glycolysis andoxidative phosphorylation as energy sources for mammalian spermmotility, using the combination of fluorescence imaging, laser tweezers, and real-time automated tracking and trapping . J. Cell Physiol. 217, 745–751.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Nover L. 1991 Heat shock response. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Schwerin M., Sanftleben H. and Grupe S. 2003 Genetic predisposition for productive life is associated with functional inactivation of a AP2-binding site in the promoter of the stress protein 70.1-encoding gene in cattle. Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf. 46, 177–185.Google Scholar
  18. Shrum K., Lester T., Rorie R., Reiter S., Looper M. and Rosenkrans J. C. F. 2010 Effects of heat shock protein 70 haplotype and tall fescue variety on bull sperm characteristics. Arkansas Agric. Res. Stat. Res. Ser. 584, 39–44.Google Scholar
  19. Tacchini L., Pogliaghi G., Radice L., Anzon E. and Bernelli-Zazzera 1995 A differential activation of heat-shock and oxidation-specific stress genes in chemically induced oxidative stress. Biochem. J. 309, 453–459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Yin Y., Hawkins K. L. and Dewolf W. C. 1997 Heat stress causes testicular germcell apoptosis in adult mice. J. Androl. 18, 159–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • RAJIB DEB
    • 1
  • BASAVRAJ SAJJANAR
    • 2
  • UMESH SINGH
    • 1
  • SUSHIL KUMAR
    • 1
  • GYANENDRA SINGH SENGAR
    • 1
  • RANI ALEX
    • 1
  • A. K. DAS
    • 1
  • S. TYAGI
    • 1
  • T. V. RAJA
    • 1
  • R. R. ALYETHODI
    • 1
  • RANI SINGH
    • 1
  • V. BHANUPRAKASH
    • 1
  • B. PRAKASH
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Genetics LaboratoryICAR-Central Institute for Research on CattleMeerutIndia
  2. 2.School of Atmospheric Stress ManagementICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress ManagementBaramatiIndia

Personalised recommendations