Journal of Genetics

, 89:401 | Cite as

Meiotic behaviour of tetraploid wheats (Triticum turgidum L.) and their synthetic hexaploid wheat derivates influenced by meiotic restitution and heat stress

  • Masoumeh Rezaei
  • Ahmad Arzani
  • Badraldin Ebrahim Sayed-Tabatabaei
Research Article


Meiotic restitution is considered to be a common mechanism of polyploidization in plants and hence is one of the most important processes in plant speciation. Meiotic behaviour of plant chromosomes is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. In this study, the meiotic behaviour of cereal crops was investigated, which includes tetraploid wheat genotypes (with and without the meiotic restitution trait) and their derivates (synthetic hexaploid wheats and a doubled haploid (DH) line), grown at two planting dates in the field. In addition, two local landraces of emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccum), one wheat cultivar (Chinese spring), one DH triticale cultivar (Eleanor) and one rye accession were included. Immature spikes of mid-autumn and end-winter sowing plants were collected in April and May 2008, respectively, fixed in Carnoy’s solution and stained with hematoxylin. Pollen mother cells (PMCs) from anthers at different stages of meiotic process were analysed for their chromosomal behaviour and irregularities. Meiotic aberrations such as laggards, chromosome bridges, micronuclei, abnormal cytokines, chromatin pulling and meiotic restitution were observed and the studied genotypes were accordingly ranked as follows: triticale > synthetic hexaploid wheats > tetraploid wheats possessing meiotic restitution > tetraploid wheats lacking meiotic restitution > rye. The results indicated that the samples that had been planted in the autumn, thus experiencing an optimum temperature level at the flowering stage, exhibited less meiotic irregularities than winter planting samples that encountered heat stress at the flowering period.


chromosome meiotic restitution temperature rye triticale wheat 


  1. Ahmad Q. N., Britten E. J. and Byth D. E. 1984 Effect of interacting genetic factors and temperature on meiosis and fertility in soybean × Glycine soja. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 26, 50–56.Google Scholar
  2. Bajpai A. and Singh A. K. 2006 Meiotic behavior of Carica papaya L.: spontaneous chromosome instability and elimination in important cvs. in north Indian conditions. Cytologia 71, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker J. T., Allen Jr L. H. and Boote K. J. 1992 Temperature effects on rice at elevated CO2 concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 959–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balatero C. H. and Darvey N. L. 1993 Influence of selected wheat and rye genotypes on the direct synthesis of hexaploid triticale. Euphytica 66, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baptista-Giacomelli F. R., Pagliarini M. S. and Almeida J. L. 2000 Meiotic behavior in several Brazilian oat cultivars (Avena sativa L.). Cytologia 65, 371–378.Google Scholar
  6. Cai X. and Xu S. S. 2007 Meiosis-driven genome variation in plants. Curr. Genome 8, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camadro E. L. 1994 Second meiotic division restitution (SDR) 2n pollen formation in diploid and hexaploid species of Asparagus. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 41, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle J. J., Flagel L. E., Paterson A. H., Rapp R. A., Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S. and Wendel J. F. 2008 Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 443–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson A. N. and Markhart A. H. 2002 Flower developmental stage and organ sensitivity of bellpepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairbanks M. M., Hardy G. E. and McComb J. A. 2002 Mitosis and meiosis in plants are affected by the fungicide phosphate. Aust. Plant Pathol. 31, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuzinatto V. A., Pagliarini M. S. and Valle C. B. 2008 Evaluation of microsporogenesis in an interspecific Brachiaria hybrid (Poaceae) collected in distinct years. Genet. Mol. Res. 7, 424–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golubovskaya I. N. 1979 Genetic control of meiosis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 58, 247–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta P. K. and Priyadarshan P. M. 1982 Triticale: present status and future prospects. Adv. Genet. 21, 255–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jauhar P. P. 2003 Formation of 2n gametes in durum wheat haploids: sexual polyploidization. Euphytica 133, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jauhar P. P. 2007 Meiotic restitution in wheat polyhaploid (amphihaploids): a potent evolutionary force. J. Hered. 98, 188–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jauhar P. P., Dogramaci-Altuntepe M., Peterson T. S. and Almouslem A. B. 2000 Seedset of synthetic haploid of durum wheat: cytological and molecular investigations. Crop Sci. 40, 1742–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaul M. L. H. and Murthy T. G. K. 1985 Mutant genes affecting higher plant meiosis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leitch A. R. and Leitch I. J. 2008 Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320, 481–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lukaszewski A. J. and Gustafson J. P. 1987 Cytogenetics of triticale. Plant Breed. Rev. 5, 41–93.Google Scholar
  20. Matsuoka Y. and Nasuda D. S. 2004 Durum wheat as a candidate for the unknown female progenitor of bread wheat: an empirical study with a highly fertile F1 hybrid with Aegilops tauschii Coss.Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1710–1717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mok D. W. S. and Peloquin S. J. 1975 The inheritance of three mechanisms of diplandroids (2n pollen) formation in diploid potato. Heredity 35, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Namuco O. S. and O’Toole J. C. 1986 Reproductive stage water stress and sterility. I. Effect of stress during meiosis. Crop Sci. 26, 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Negri V. and Lemmi G. 1998 Effect of selection and temperature stress on the production of 2n gametes in Lotus tenuis. Plant Breed. 117, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oettler G. 2005 The fortune of a botanical curiosity triticale: past present and future. Agric. Sci. 143, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Otto S. P. 2007 The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pagliarini M. S. 2000 Meiotic behavior of economically important plant species: the relationship between fertility and male sterility. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23, 997–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porch T. G. and Jahn M. 2001 Effects of high-temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramanna M. S. and Jacobsen E. 2003 Relevance of sexual polyploidization for crop improvement—a review. Euphytica 133, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rieseberg L. H. and Willis J. H. 2007 Plant speciation. Science 317, 910–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saini H. S. 1997 Effect of water stress on male gametophyte development in plant. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sang T., Pan J., Zhang D., Ferguson D., Wang C., Hong D. Y. and Pan K. U. 2004 Origins of polyploids: an example from peonies (Paeonia) and a model for angiosperms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SAS Institute 2003 SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 9. 1. SAS Institute, Cary, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Sato S., Peet M.M. and Thomas J. F. 2002 Determining critical preand post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1187–1195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sato S., Kamiyama M., Iwata T., Makita N., Furukawa H. and Ikeda H. 2006 Moderate increase of mean daily temperature adversely affects fruit set of Lycopersicon esculentum by disrupting specific physiological processes in male reproductive development. Ann. Bot. 97, 731–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sayed-Tabatabaei B. E. 1996 Meiotic restitution and tissue culture in wheat and triticale. Ph.D. thesis. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. Sheidai M. and Fadaei F. 2005 Cytogenetic studies in some species of Bromus L., section Genea Dum. J. Genet. 84, 189–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silkova O. G., Shchapova A. I. and Shumny V. K. 2007 Role of rye chromosome 2R from wheat-rye substitution line 2R(2D) (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Saratovskaya 29 Secale cereale L. cv. Onokhoiskaya) in genetic regulation of meiotic restitution in wheat rye polyhaploids. Russ. J. Genet. 43, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun K., Hunt K. and Hauser B. A. 2004 Ovule abortion in Arabidopsis triggered by stress. Plant Physiol. 135, 2358–2367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tai W. 1970 Multipolar meiosis in diploid crested wheat grass, Agropyron cristatum. Am. J. Bot. 57, 1160–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veilleux R. E. and Lauer F. I. 1981 Variation for 2n pollen production in clones of Solanum phureja Juz. and Buk. Theor. Appl. Genet. 59, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Viccini L. F. and Carvalho C. R. 2002 Meiotic chromosomal variation resulting from irradiation of pollen in maize. J. Appl. Genet. 43, 463–469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu S. J. and Joppa L. R. 2000 First-division restitution in hybrids of Langdon durum disomic substitution lines with rye and Aegilops squarrosa. Plant. Breed. 119, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang L. Q., Yen Y., Zheng Y. L. and Liu D. C. 2007 Meiotic restriction in emmer wheat is controlled by one or more nuclear genes that continue to function in derived lines. Sex. Plant. Reprod. 20, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang L. Q., Liu D. C., Zheng Y. L., Yan Z. H., Dai S. F., Li Y. F. et al. 2009 Frequent occurrence of unreduced gametes in Triticum turgidum-Aegilops tauschii hybrids. Euphytica 172, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masoumeh Rezaei
    • 1
  • Ahmad Arzani
    • 1
  • Badraldin Ebrahim Sayed-Tabatabaei
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant BreedingIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, College of AgricultureIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations