Journal of Genetics

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Parental-age effects in Down syndrome

(Commentary on L. S. Penrose 1933 J. Genet. 27, 219–224; reprinted in this issue as a J. Genet. classic, pages 9–14)
Commentary on J. Genet. Classic

Keywords

Down syndrome trisomy 21 meiosis Penrose parental age nondisjunction human genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen G., Benda C. E., Book J. A., Carter C. O., Ford C. E., Chu E. H. et al. 1961 “Mongolism”. Lancet 1, 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonarakis S. E. 1991 Parental origin of the extra chromosome in trisomy 21 as indicated by analysis of DNA polymorphisms. N. Engl. J. Med. 324, 872–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonarakis S. E., Lyle R., Dermitzakis E. T., Reymond A. and Deutsch S. 2004 Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 725–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuzova S., Cuckle H., Mueller R. and Sehmi I. 2001 Familial Down syndrome: evidence supporting cytoplasmic inheritance. Clin. Genet. 60, 456–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayme S. and Lippman-Hand A. 1982 Maternal-age effect in aneuploidy: does altered embryonic selection play a role? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 34, 558–565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianco K., Caughey A. B., Shaffer B. L., Davis R. and Norton M. E. 2006 History of miscarriage and increased incidence of fetal aneuploidy in subsequent pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 107, 1098–1102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuckle H. S., Wald N. J. and Thompson S. G. 1987 Estimating a woman’s risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down’s syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 94, 387–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Down J. L. H. 1866 Observations on an ethnic classification of idiots. In Clinical lecture reports, 3, 259–262. London Hospital.Google Scholar
  9. Dzurova D. and Pikhart H. 2005 Down syndrome, paternal age and education: comparison of California and the Czech Republic. BMC Public Health 5, 69–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson J. D. 1978 Down syndrome, paternal age, maternal age and birth order. Ann. Hum. Genet. 41, 289–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson J. D. and Bjerkedal T. O. 1981 Down syndrome associated with father’s age in Norway. J. Med. Genet. 18, 22–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisch H., Hyun G., Golden R., Hensle T. W., Olsson C. A. and Liberson G. L. 2003 The influence of paternal age on Down syndrome. J. Urol. 169, 2275–2278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassold T. J. and Jacobs P. A. 1984 Trisomy in man. Annu. Rev. Genet. 18, 69–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassold T. and Hunt P. 2001 To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 280–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassold T., Warburton D., Kline J. and Stein Z. 1984 The relationship of maternal age and trisomy among trisomic spontaneous abortions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 36, 1349–1356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hook E. B. 1983 Down syndrome rates and relaxed selection at older maternal ages. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 35, 1307–1313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hook E. B. 1987 Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counseling for Down syndrome. Hum. Genet. 77, 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hook E. B., Cross P. K., Lamson S. H., Regal R. R., Baird P. A. and Uh S. H. 1981 Paternal age and Down syndrome in British Columbia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 33, 123–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hook E. B., Topol B. B. and Cross P. K. 1989 The natural history of cytogenetically abnormal fetuses detected at midtrimester amniocentesis which are not terminated electively: new data and estimates of the excess and relative risk of late fetal death associated with 47,+21 and some other abnormal karyotypes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 45, 855–861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt P. A. and Hassold T. J. 2008 Human female meiosis: what makes a good egg go bad? Trends Genet. 24, 86–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Irving C., Basu A., Richmond S., Burn J. and Wren C. 2008 Twenty-year trends in prevalence and survival of Down syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 16, 1336–1340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones K. L. 2006 Recognizable patterns of human malformation. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. Kline J. and Levin B. 1992 Trisomy and age at menopause: predicted associations given a link with rate of oocyte atresia. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 6, 225–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kline J., Kinney A., Levin B. and Warburton D. 2000 Trisomic pregnancy and earlier age at menopause. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kline J., Kinney A., Reuss M. L., Kelly A., Levin B., Ferin M. and Warburton D. 2004 Trisomic pregnancy and the oocyte pool. Hum. Reprod. 19, 1633–1643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamb N. E., Feingold E., Savage A., Avramopoulos D., Freeman S., Gu Y. et al. 1997 Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 1391–1399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamb N. E., Yu K., Shaffer J., Feingold E. and Sherman S. L. 2005 Association between maternal age and meiotic recombination for trisomy 21. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 91–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laxova R. 1998 Lionel Sharples Penrose, 1898–1972: a personal memoir in celebration of the centenary of his birth. Genetics 150, 1333–1340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lejeune J., Gautier M. and Turpin R. 1959 Etude des chromosomes somatiques de neuf enfants mongoliens. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 248, 1724–1722.Google Scholar
  30. Mantel N. and C. R. Stark 1967 Paternal age in Down’s syndrome. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 71, 1025–1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Neilson J. P. and Alfirevic Z. 2006 Optimising prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome. BMJ 332, 433–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nomenclature 1975 Classification and nomenclature of morphological defects. Lancet 1, 513.Google Scholar
  33. Nussbaum R. L., McInnes R. R. and Willard H. F. 2007 Prenatal diagnosis. In Thompson and Thompson Genetics in Medicine. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  34. Patterson D. and Costa A. C. 2005 Down syndrome and genetics — a case of linked histories. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 137–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Penrose L. S. 1933 The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism. J. Genet. 27, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penrose L. S. 1934 The relative aetiological importance of birth order and maternal age in Mongolism. Proc. R. Soc. London. B 115, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Penrose L. S. 1954 Mongolian idiocy (mongolism) and maternal age. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 57, 494–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penrose L. S. 1964 Genetic aspects of mental deficiency. In Proceedings of the international Copenhagen congress on the scientific study of mental retardation, Vol. 2 (ed. J. Öster), pp. 165–172, Det Berlingske Bogtrykkeri, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  39. Petersen M. B., Schinzel A. A., Binkert F., Tranebjaerg L., Mikkelsen M., Collins F. A. et al. 1991 Use of short sequence repeat DNA polymorphisms after PCR amplification to detect the parental origin of the additional chromosome 21 in Down syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48, 65–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Petersen M. B., Antonarakis S. E., Hassold T. J., Freeman S. B., Sherman S. L., Avramopoulos D. and Mikkelsen M. 1993 Paternal nondisjunction in trisomy 21: excess of male patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1691–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roper R. J. and Reeves R. H. 2006 Understanding the basis for Down syndrome phenotypes. P LoS Genet. 2, e50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saller Jr D. N. and Canick J. A. 2008 Current methods of prenatal screening for Down syndrome and other fetal abnormalities. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 51, 24–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Savage A. R., Petersen M. B., Pettay D., Taft L., Allran K., Freeman S. B. et al. 1998 Elucidating the mechanisms of paternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1221–1227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Savva G. M., Morris J. M., Mutton D. E. and Alberman E. 2006 Maternal age-specific fetal loss rates in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 26, 499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sherman S. L., Lamb N. E., Feingold E. 2006 Relationship of recombination patterns and maternal age among non-disjoined chromosomes 21. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 54, 578–580.Google Scholar
  46. Sherman S. L., Allen E. G., Bean L. H. and Freeman S. B. 2007 Epidemiology of Down syndrome. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 13, 221–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snijders R. 1999 Fetal loss in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 19, 1180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Snijders R. J., Sundberg K., Holzgreve W., Henry G. and Nicolaides K. H. 1999 Maternal age and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 13, 167–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steele Jr M. W. and Breg W. R. 1966 Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet 1, 383–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stene J., Stene E., Stengel-Rutkowski S. and Murken J. D. 1981 Paternal age and Down’s syndrome: data from prenatal diagnoses (DFG). Hum. Genet. 59, 119–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stene E., Stene J. and Stengel-Rutkowski S. 1987 A reanalysis of the New York State prenatal diagnosis data on Down’s syndrome and paternal age effects. Hum. Genet. 77, 299–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valenti C., Schutta E. J. and Kehaty T. 1968 Prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome. Lancet 2, 220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warburton D. 1989 The effect of maternal age on the frequency of trisomy: change in meiosis or in utero selection? Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 311, 165–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Warburton D. 1997 Human female meiosis: new insights into an error-prone process. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warburton D. 2005 Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 111, 266–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright S. 1926 Effect of age of parents upon characteristics of the Guinea-pig. Am. Nat. 60, 552–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genome SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations