Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of aquifer zones and its protection via second-order geoelectric indices in parts of drought-prone region of Deccan Volcanic Province, Maharashtra, India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of aquifer protection was studied in the drought-prone regions of Mann Ganga River basin encompassing the districts of Satara, Sangli and Solapur, in Deccan Volcanic Province of Maharashtra, India, using electrical resistivity technique. The study was also aimed at alleviating the drinking water scarcity in these regions. A total of 118 vertical electrical sounding sites were occupied using Schlumberger electrode configuration and the data analysis revealed two to five layered curve types. The modelled layer resistivity and layer thickness at every station were used to calculate the Dar–Zarrouk parameters (i.e., longitudinal conductance S and transverse resistance T). The S values showed that 67% of the area had a poor aquifer protection, whereas 16% had moderate protective capacity and 13% had weak aquifer protective capacity rating. Only 4% of the study area depicted a good protective capacity rating. This indicates that the study area has a rather poor aquifer protective capacity rating, and thereby more prone to infiltrating contaminants. The regions with good-to-moderate protective capacity are envisaged to be potential groundwater zones. The large variation in electrical anisotropy \(\lambda \) ranging from 1 to 2.8 in the study area suggests the anisotropic disposition of the aquifers in basaltic region. The intersection points of several lineaments in the study area are probable to be the most favourable zone for groundwater recharge. This is corroborated by the lineament density of the area, wherein high lineament density reflects high probability of groundwater infiltration. Moreover, the rainfall distribution suggests that the central and eastern parts of the study area receive maximum precipitation, which also coincides with the zones of high lineament density. Particle size analysis was determined from 92 soil samples in the study area and correlated with the longitudinal conductance in order to identify the sub-surface conditions and the aquifer vulnerability. Significant positive correlation was observed between the longitudinal conductance and percentage of clay fraction in the study area. These results could be relied upon for making preliminary estimates of protection from pollution for a sustainable groundwater development and management in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adejumo S A, Oyerinde A O and Aleem M O 2015 Integrated geophysical and geotechnical subsoil evaluation for pre-foundation study of proposed site of Vocational Skill and Entrepreneurship Center at The Polytechnic, Ibadan, SW, Nigeria; Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 6(6) 910–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Kaya M, Özürlan G and Balkaya Ç 2015 Geoelectrical investigation of seawater intrusion in the coastal urban area of Çanakkale, NW Turkey; Environ. Earth Sci. 73(3) 1151–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayuk M A, Adelusi A O and Adiat K A N 2013 Evaluation of groundwater potential and aquifer protective capacity assessment at Tutugbua-Olugboyega area, off Ondo road, Akure Southwestern Nigeria; Int. J. Phys. Sci. 8(1) 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batayneh A T and Al-Taani A A 2016 Integrated resistivity and water chemistry for evaluation of groundwater quality of the Gulf of Aqaba coastal area in Saudi Arabia; Geosci. J. 20(3) 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya B B and Shalivahan 2016 Geoelectric methods: Theory and application; McGraw Hill Education (India) Pvt. Ltd, India.

  • Bobachev A 2003 Resistivity sounding interpretation; IPI2WIN: Version 3.0.1, a 7.01.03, Moscow State University.

  • CGWB 2013 Groundwater information: Satara district, Maharashtra; Tech. Rep. No. 1798/DBR/2013, Govt. of India Ministry of Water Resources Central Ground Water Board.

  • Dahlin T 2000 Electrode charge-up effects in DC resistivity data acquisition using multi electrode arrays; Geophys. Prospect. 48(1) 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S N and DeWiest R J M 1966 Hydrogeology; John Wiley & Sons, New York, 463p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Rodríguez O, Peinado–Guevara H J, Green-Ruíz C R, Herrera-Barrientos J and Shevnin V 2011 Determination of hydraulic conductivity and fines content in soils near an unlined irrigation canal in Guasave, Sinaloa, Mexico; J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 11(3) 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deolankar S B 1980 The Deccan Basalt of Maharashtra, India – Their potential as aquifers; Groundwater 18(5) 434–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh K and Aher S 2014 Particle size analysis of soils and its interpolation using GIS technique from Sangamner area, MS, India; Int. Res. J. Env. Sci. 3(10) 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande G G 1998 Geology of Maharashtra; Geological Society of India, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolui G, Chatterjee S and Das Chatterjee N 2016 Geophysical and geochemical alteration of rocks in granitic profiles during intense weathering in southern Purulia district, West Bengal, India; Model Earth Syst. Environ. 2 132, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0188-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraiswami R A, Maskare B and Patankar U 2012 Geochemistry of groundwater in the arid regions of Deccan trap country, Maharashtra, India; Mem. Ind. Soc. Appl. Geochem. 1 60–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edet A E, Teme S C, Okereke C S and Esu E O 1994 Lineament analysis for groundwater exploration in Precambrian Oban massif and Obudu plateau, SE Nigeria; J. Mining Geol. 30 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelman R and Leroy P 1993 Sustaining water: Population and the future of renewable water supplies; Population Action International, Washington, DC, 56p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukue M, Minatoa T, Horibe H and Taya N 1999 The microstructure of clay given by resistivity measurements; Eng. Geol. 54 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Puentes F J, Pérez-Flores M A, Reyes-López J A, Lopez D L, Herrera-Barrientos F, García-Cueto R O, Romero-Hernández S, Solís-Domínguez F A and Martín-Loeches Garrido M 2016 Geochemical modeling and low-frequency geoelectrical methods to evaluate the impact of an open dump in arid and deltaic environments; Environ. Earth Sci. 75 1062, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5860-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriet J P 1976 Direct application of Dar–Zarrouk parameters in ground water surveys; Geophys. Prospect. 24 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inakwu O A O, Alison J T and John T 2003 Spatial prediction of soil particle-size fractions as compositional data; J. Soil Sci. 168(7) 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islami N, Taib S H, Yusoff I and Ghani A A 2012 Integrated geoelectrical resistivity, hydrochemical and soil property analysis methods to study shallow groundwater in the agriculture area, Machang, Malaysia; Environ. Earth Sci. 65 699–712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1117-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller G V and Frischknecht F C 1966 Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting; Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotra K K, Yedluri I, Prasad S and Pasupureddi S 2016 Integrated geophysical and geochemical assessment for the comprehensive study of the groundwater; Water Air Soil Pollut. 227 211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2902-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Brahmam N and Negi J G 1973 Rift valleys beneath Deccan trap, India; Geophys. Res. Bull. 11 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Thiagarajan S and Rai S N 2011 Deciphering geothermal resources in Deccan Trap Region using electrical resistivity tomography technique; J. Geol. Soc. India 78 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Rai S N, Thiagarajan S and Ratnakumari Y 2014 Evaluation of heterogeneous aquifers in hardrocks from resistivity sounding data in parts of Kalmeshwar taluk of Nagpur district, India; Curr. Sci. 107(7) 1137–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R and Stewart B A 1994 Soil processes and water quality. Advances in Soil Science; Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 398p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy P and Revil A 2004 A triple-layer model of the surface electrochemical properties of clay minerals; J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 270 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machender G, Dhakate R, Mallikharjuna Rao S T, Mangaraja Rao M and Prasanna L 2014 Heavy metal contamination in sediments of Balanagar Industrial area, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India; Arab J. Geosci. 7(2) 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillet R 1947 The fundamental equation of electrical prospecting; Geophysics 12 529–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti S, Erram V C, Gupta G, Tiwari R K, Kulkarni U D and Sangpal R R 2013 Assessment of groundwater quality: A fusion of geochemical and geophysical information via Bayesian Neural Networks; Environ. Monit. Assess. 185 3445–3465 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2802-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal N C, Singh V P and Ahmed S 2013 Delineating shallow saline groundwater zones from Southern India using geophysical indicators; Environ. Monit. Assess. 185 4869–4886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal N C, Tiwari K K, Sharma K C and Ahmed S 2016 A diagnosis of groundwater quality from a semiarid region in Rajasthan, India; Arab. J. Geosci. 9 602, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2619-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murali S and Patangay N S 2006 Principles of application of groundwater geophysics; 3rd edn, Association of Geophysicists, Hyderabad, India, 371p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndatuwong L G and Yadav G S 2015 Application of geo-electrical data to evaluate groundwater potential zone and assessment of overburden protective capacity in part of Sonebhadra district, Uttar Pradesh; Environ. Earth Sci. 73 3655–3664, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3649-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oladapo M I and Akintorinwa O J 2007 Hydrogeophysical study of Ogbese Southwestern, Nigeria; Global J. Pure Appl. Sci. 13(1) 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oladapo M I, Mohammed M Z, Adeoye O O and Adetola B A 2004 Geoelectrical investigation of the Ondo State Housing Corporation Estate, Ijapo Akure, Southwestern Nigeria; J. Mining Geol. 40(1) 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana E and Mooney H M 1966 Master tables and curves for vertical electrical sounding over layered structures; Interciencia, Madrid, Spain, 159p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey O P, Chandrakala K, Parthasarathy G and Reddy P R 2009 Upwarped high velocity mafic crust, subsurface tectonics and causes of intraplate Latur-Killari (M 6.2) and Koyna (M 6.3) earthquakes, India – A comparative study; J. Asian Earth Sci. 34 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh R, Brindha K and Elango L 2015 Groundwater quality and its hydrochemical characteristics in a shallow weathered rock aquifer of southern India; Water Qual. Expo. Health 7 515–524, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0166-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh K and Elango L 2012 Groundwater quality and its suitability for domestic and agricultural use in Tondiar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India; Environ. Monit. Assess. 184 3887–3899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2231-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revil A and Leroy P 2001 Hydroelectric coupling in a clayey material; Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 1643–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem H S 1999 Determination of fluid transmissivity and electric transverse resistance for shallow aquifers and deep reservoirs from surface and well-log electric measurements; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 3(3) 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shailaja G, Laxminarayana M, Patil J D, Erram V C, Suryawanshi R A and Gupta G 2016 Efficacy of anisotropic properties in groundwater exploration from geoelectric sounding over trap covered terrain; J. Ind. Geophys. Union 20(5) 453–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevnin V, Mousatov A, Ryjov A and Delgado-Rodríguez O 2007 Estimation of clay content in soil based on resistivity modeling and laboratory measurements; Geophys. Prospect. 55 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh C L and Singh S N 1970 Some geoelectrical investigations for potential groundwater in part of Azamgrah area of UP; Pure Appl. Geophys. 82 270–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skordas K and Kelepertsis A 2005 Soil contamination by toxic metals in the cultivated region of Agia, Thessaly, Greece; Environ. Geol. 48 615–624, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-1319-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff 1975 Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys; U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Agri. Handbook No. 436, Washington DC, 754p.

  • Telford N W, Geldart L P, Sheriff R S and Keys D A 1990 Applied geophysics; Cambridge University Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari V M, Vyaghreswara Rao M B S and Mishra D C 2001 Density in homogenities beneath Deccan Volcanic Province, India as derived from gravity data; J. Geodyn. 31 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsepav M T, Adamu Y and Umar M A 2015 Evaluation of aquifer protective capacity and soil corrosivity using geoelectrical method; Int. J. Math. Comput. Phys. Electr. Comp. Eng. 9(11) 666–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasanthi A and Satish Kumar K 2016 Understanding conspicuous gravity low over the Koyna–Warna Seismogenic Region (Maharashtra, India) and Earthquake Nucleation: A paradigm shift; Pure Appl. Geophys. 173 1933–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohdy A A R and Jackson D B 1969 Application of deep electrical soundings for groundwater exploration in Hawaii; Geophysics 34 584–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohdy A A R, Eaton G P and Mabey D R 1974 Application of surface geophysics to ground-water investigation; 2nd edn, United States Geological Survey, Reston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are obliged to Dr D S Ramesh, Director, IIG, for providing the necessary facilities required for the survey and for his constant guidance. Financial support as fellowship given to the first author (GS) by IIG is duly acknowledged. The authors appreciate the assistance of Shri B D Kadam and Dr V C Erram during data acquisition. Drafting of figures by Shri B I Panchal is gratefully acknowledged. The authors express their deep sense of gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and Prof M Radhakrishna, Associate Editor, for their critical comments and excellent suggestions for improving this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Gupta.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Munukutla Radhakrishna

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 Geoelectrical layers and D–Z parameters in the Mann Ganga River basin, Maharashtra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shailaja, G., Gupta, G., Suneetha, N. et al. Assessment of aquifer zones and its protection via second-order geoelectric indices in parts of drought-prone region of Deccan Volcanic Province, Maharashtra, India. J Earth Syst Sci 128, 78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1104-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1104-y

Keywords

Navigation