Shallow subsurface imaging of the Wagad active fault system (Kachchh, northwestern India) by time domain electromagnetic studies

  • G Pavan KumarEmail author
  • Maul Nagar
  • Virendar Choudhary
  • A Durga Prasad


The Kachchh rift basin (KRB) in the northwestern Indian shield is one of the most seismically active intraplate regions of the world. It has witnessed four large earthquakes in the past two centuries that leads the region most vulnerable for seismic hazard. For effective seismic hazard assessment, detailed information on faults and its subsurface geometry is essential. Recently, shallow subsurface geophysical studies, particularly electrical resistivity studies have become a successful practice in imaging of fault zones and their attribute. In the present study, we carried out the time domain electromagnetic (TDEM) investigations across the Wagad highland of eastern KRB to map shallow subsurface structure and imaging fault zones in terms of resistivity. Resistivity section obtained after combining one dimensional models of 21 sites display significant details of the fault structures and geometry of shallow basin infill down to 200 m. The shallow layer of the basin infill across the South Wagad fault (SWF) and the North Wagad fault has a wedge shape made of unconsolidated deposits with thickness of \(\sim \)15–20 m. We infer that it might be due to syntectonic sedimentation due to the footwall subsidence across a branch fault of the SWF. The section indicates a \(\sim \)60–65 and 50–55 m estimates of cumulative throws for the SWF and NWF, respectively. Across the Gedi fault, the section indicates least block displacements, which might either be due to dominate strike-slip nature of faulting or more activeness of NWF compared to GF during the recent geological past. The results from the study affirm the ongoing Holocene deformation in the region signifying active nature of these faults.


Time domain electromagnetics resistivity active faults Kachchh 



We are very thankful to the Director General and the Director, ISR for the kind permission to publish the present work. We thank E Mahender, Dilip Singh and Prutul Patel for their help in TDEM field survey. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewer for the constructive suggestions which enhances the quality of the manuscript.


  1. Bhattacharya F, Rastogi B K and Kothyari G 2013 Morphometric evidence of seismicity around the Wagad and Gedi Faults, eastern Kachchh, Gujarat, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 81 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas S K and Khattri K N 2002 A geological study of earthquakes in Kutch, Gujarat, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 60 131–142.Google Scholar
  3. Biswas S K 1993 Geology of Kutch; KDM Institute of Petroleum Exploration, Dehradun, 450p.Google Scholar
  4. Biswas S K 2016 Tectonic framework, structure and tectonic evolution of Kutch Basin, western India; Spec. Publ. Geol. Soc. India 6 129–150.Google Scholar
  5. Biswas S K 2005 A review of structure and tectonics of Kutch basin, western India, with special reference to earthquakes; Curr. Sci. 88 1592–1600.Google Scholar
  6. Biswas S K and Deshpande S V 1970 Geological and tectonic maps of Kutch; ONGC Bull. 7 115–116.Google Scholar
  7. Chandrasekhar D V, Burgmann R, Reddy C D, Sunil P S and Schmidt D A 2009 Weak mantle in NW India probed by geodetic measurements following the 2001 Bhuj earthquake; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 280 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandrasekhar E, Mathew G and Harinarayana T 2012 A new hypothesis for the deep subsurface structures near the Bhuj 2001 earthquake (Mw 7.6) hypocenter zone and its tectonic implications; Geophys. J. Int. 190 761–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chowksey V, Maurya D M, Joshi J, Khonde N, Das A and Chamyal L S 2011 Lithostratigraphic development and neotectonic significance of the Quaternary sediments along the Kachchh Mainland Fault (KMF) zone, Western India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 120(6) 979–999.Google Scholar
  10. Civico R, Sapia V, Di Giulio G, Villani F, Pucci S, Baccheschi P, Amoroso S, Cantore L, Di Naccio D, Hailemikael S, Smedile M, Vassallo M, Marchetti M and Pantosti D 2017 Geometry and evolution of a fault-controlled Quaternary basin by means of TDEM and single station ambient vibration surveys: the example of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake area; J. Geophys. Res.,
  11. Electromagnetic Research Group for Active Fault 1982 Low electrical resistivity along an active fault, the Yamasaki fault; J. Geomag. Geoelectric. 34 103–127.Google Scholar
  12. Goldman M, Gilad D, Rouen A and Melloul A 1991 Mapping of seawater intrusion into the coastal aquifer of Israel by the time domain electromagnetic method; Geoexploration 28 153– 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kayal J R, Zhao D, Mishra O P, De R and Singh O P 2002 The 2001 Bhuj earthquake: Tomographic evidence for fluids at the hypocenter and its implications for rupture nucleation; Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(24) 2512, Scholar
  14. Kothyari G C, Dumka R K, Singh A P, Chauhan G, Thakkar M G and Biswas S K 2016 Tectonic evolution and stress pattern of South Wagad Fault at the Kachchh Rift Basin in western India; Geol. Mag.,
  15. MacInnes S and Raymond M 2001 ZONGE data processing smooth-model TEM inversion, version 3.00, Zonge Engineering and Research Organization, Inc.,
  16. Malik J N, Sohoni P S, Merh S S and Karanth R V 2001 Active tectonic control on alluvial fan architecture along the Kachchh Mainland Hill Range, Western India; Zeithschrift fur Geomorphologie 45 81–100.Google Scholar
  17. Mandal P 2016 Variations of seismic velocities in the Kachchh rift zone, Gujarat, India, during 2001–2013; Tectonophys. 672 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandal P, Chadha R K, Raju I P, Kumar N, Satyamurty C, Narsaiah R and Maji A 2007 Coulomb static stress variations in the Kachchh, Gujarat, India: implications for the occurrences of two recent earthquakes (Mw = 5.6) in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake region; Geophys. J. Int. 169 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandal P, Rastogi B K, Satyanarayana H V S and Kousalya M 2004 Results from local earthquake velocity tomography: Implications toward the source process involved in generating the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake in the lower crust beneath Kachchh (India); Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94(2) 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathew G, Singhvi A K and Karanth R V 2006 Luminescence chronometry and geomorphic evidence of active fold growth along the Kachchh Mainland Fault (KMF), Kachchh, India: Seismotectonic implications; Tectonophys. 422 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maurya D M, Chouksey V, Joshi P N and Chamyal L S 2013 Application of GPR for delineating the neotectonic setting and shallow subsurface nature of the seismically active Gedi fault, Kachchh, western India; J. Geophys. Eng. 10 034006, Scholar
  22. McCalpin J P and Thakkar M G 2003 Bhuj–Kachchh earthquake: Surface faulting and its relation with neotectonics and regional structures, Gujarat, Western India; Ann. Geophys. 46 937–956.Google Scholar
  23. McNeill J D 1994 Principles and application of time domain electromagnetic techniques for resistivity sounding; Geonics technical note TN-27, Mississauga, Ontario, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  24. Merh S S 1995 Geology of Gujarat; Geological Society of India (GSI).Google Scholar
  25. Mills T, Hoekstra P, Blohm M and Evans L 1988 Time domain electromagnetic soundings for mapping seawater intrusion in Monterey County, California; Ground Water 26 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mithila V and Bansal B 2016 Active fault research in India: Achievements and future perspective; Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk 7(1) 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nabighian M N and Macnae J C 1991 Time domain electromagnetic prospecting methods; In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics (ed.) Nabighian M N, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 427–520.Google Scholar
  28. Naganjaneyulu K, Ledo J J and Queralt P 2010 Deep crustal electromagnetic structure of Bhuj earthquake region (India) and its implications; Geol Acta  18 83–97.Google Scholar
  29. Patidar A K, Maurya D M, Thakkar M G and Chamyal L S 2008 Evidence of neotectonic reactivation of the Katrol Hill Fault during late Quaternary and its GPR characterization; Curr. Sci. 94 338–346.Google Scholar
  30. Patidar A K, Maurya D M, Thakkar M G and Chamyal L S 2007 Fluvial geomorphology and neotectonic activity based on field and GPR data, Katrol hill range, Kachchh, Western India; Quat. Int. 159 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pavan Kumar G, Mahender E, Singh Y K, Mahesh P and Kapil Mohan 2016 Delineation of aquifer layer along Anjar–Rapar Corridor, eastern Kachchh basin, Gujarat using electromagnetic investigations; J. Indian. Geophys. Union 20(2) 201–208.Google Scholar
  32. Pavan Kumar G, Choudhary V K, Mehul Nagar E, Mahendhar, Singh D, Patel P and Mahesh P 2017 Magnetotelluric impedance tensor analysis for identification of transverse tectonic feature in the Wagad uplift, Kachchh, northwest India; J. Earth Syst. Sci.,
  33. Pavan Kumar G, Mahesh P, Mehul Nagar E, Mahender, Kumar V, Kapil Mohan and Ravi Kumar M 2017 Role of deep crustal fluids in the genesis of intraplate earthquakes in the Kachchh region, northwestern India; Geophys. Res. Lett. 44,
  34. Rajendran C P, Rajendran K, Thakkar M and Goyal B 2008 Assessing the previous activity at the source zone of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake based on the near-source and distant paleo-seismological indicators; J. Geophys. Res. 113 B05311, Scholar
  35. Rastogi B K, Mandal P and Biswas S K 2014 Seismogenesis of earthquakes occurring in the ancient rift basin of Kachchh, Western India; In: Intraplate Earthquakes (ed.) Talwani P, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 126–161.Google Scholar
  36. Rastogi B K, Agarwal S K, Rao N and Choudhury P 2012 Triggered/migrated seismicity due to the 2001 Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake, Western India; Nat. Hazards. 33(5),
  37. Singh A P, Zhao L, Kumar S and Mishra S 2016 Inversions for earthquake focal mechanisms and regional stress in the Kachchh Rift Basin, Western India: Tectonic implications; J. Asian Earth. Sci. 117 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Talwani P 2016 On the nature of intraplate earthquakes; J. Seismol. 21(1) 47–68, Scholar
  39. Villani F, Tulliani V, Sapia V, Fierro E, Civico R and Pantosti D 2015 Shallow subsurface imaging of Piano di Pezza active normal fault (Central Italy) by high resolution refraction and electrical resistivity tomography coupled with time domain electromagnetic data; Geophys. J. Int. 203 1482–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G Pavan Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maul Nagar
    • 1
  • Virendar Choudhary
    • 1
  • A Durga Prasad
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Seismological ResearchRaisan, GandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations