Advertisement

Groundwater faecal pollution observation in parts of Indo-Ganges–Brahmaputra river basin from in-situ measurements and satellite-based observations

  • Srimanti DuttaguptaEmail author
  • Animesh Bhattacharya
  • Abhijit Mukherjee
  • Siddhartha Chattopadhyay
  • Soumendra Nath Bhanja
  • Soumyajit Sarkar
  • Pragnaditya Malakar
  • Jayanta Bhattacharya
Article
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

More than quarter of underprivileged global population, who lack access to basic sanitation and clean drinking water, live in India. Consequently, every year, millions suffer with enteric diseases from drinking faecal-contaminated groundwater. The UN Sustainable Development Goal lists access to safe water and basic sanitation for all by 2030, as their sixth goal. For the first time, the role of economic improvement on decrease in water-borne faecal pathogens was studied across Indo-Ganges–Brahmaputra river basin (IGB) for almost last three decades, to delineate the long-term improvement trends of groundwater quality across India, as a consequence of development. Long-term temporal (1990–2017) and high-resolution spatial (administrative block scale, \(n=2217\)) datasets of water-borne faecal pathogen concentration in groundwater and satellite-based nightlight (NL) were used to investigate the statistical trends and causal relationships. Linear and nonlinear (Hodrick–Prescott) trend analyses, panel data analyses, Bayesian vector autoregression (VAR) and lead–lag causality (LLC) analyses were performed on aforesaid culled datasets. However, the efficiency of development in alleviating the water quality and public health, and relationship with economic development, has not been well understood. Here, for the first time, using long-term, high-spatial resolution (\(n=2217\)), annual in-situ measurements and multivariate statistical models, we show that the spatially variable groundwater faecal pathogen concentration (FC, 2002–2017, \(-1.39 \pm 0.01\)%/yr) has been significantly decreased across the basin. In most areas, increasing satellite-based NL plays a significant role (\(\hbox {NL}\), 1992–2013, \(3.05 \pm 0.01\)%/yr) in reduction of FC. However, in areas with low literacy rate surpass development. Enhanced decrease of faecal coliform concentration in groundwater possibly signifies the implementation of Clean India Mission since 2014.

Keywords

Faecal coliform nightlight Indo-Ganges–Brahmaputra basin sustainable development goal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study could not have been executed without the cooperation of the Public Health Engineering Directorate and State Water Investigation Directorate, Government of West Bengal. We acknowledge the National Rural Drinking Water Programme, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India, for data availability. However, the ideas presented in this paper are those of the authors and have not been officially endorsed by the government or any other person or organisation. We acknowledge the efficient editorial handling by the Associate Editor and constructive review by an anonymous reviewer. We would like to thank Drs Tilottama Ghosh and Sohini Sahu for their constant support on processing of nightlight datasets. Special thanks to Swagata Chakraborty and other colleagues at IIT Kharagpur for their valuable inputs.

References

  1. Adler N E, Boyce T, Chesney M A, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn R L and Syme S L 1994 Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient; Am. Psychol. 49 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain R, Cronk R, Hossain R, Bonjour S, Onda K, Wright J, Yang H, Slaymaker T, Hunter P and Prüss-Ustün A 2014 Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review; Trop. Med. Int. Health 19 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borenstein M, Hedges L V, Higgins J P and Rothstein H R 2010 A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis; Res. Synth. Methods 1 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter S R, Caraco N F, Correll D L, Howarth R W, Sharpley A N and Smith V H 1998 Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen; Ecol. Appl. 8 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Central Intelligence Agency 2009 The CIA world factbook 2010; Skyhorse Publishing Inc., New York NY 10018, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Clasen T, Fabini D, Boisson S, Taneja J, Song J, Aichinger E, Bui A, Dadashi S, Schmidt W-P and Burt Z 2012 Making sanitation count: Developing and testing a device for assessing latrine use in low-income settings; Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 3295–3303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gandomi A and Haider M 2015 Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics; Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hodrick R J and Prescott E C 1997 Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation; J. Money Credit Bank 29(1) 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huong N T T 2012 Trends of urbanization and suburbanization in southeast Asia; Trends Urban Suburbanization Southeast Asia 325.Google Scholar
  10. Jamieson R, Gordon R, Joy D and Lee H 2004 Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters: A review of current watershed scale modeling approaches; Agric. Water Manag. 70 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mallin M A, Williams K E, Esham E C and Lowe R P 2000 Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds; Ecol. Appl. 10 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martinez J L 2009 Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants; Environ. Pollut. 157 2893–2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukherjee A, Fryar A E and Howell P D 2007 Regional hydrostratigraphy and groundwater flow modeling in the arsenic-affected areas of the western Bengal basin, West Bengal, India; Hydrogeol. J. 15 1397.Google Scholar
  14. Mukherjee A, Fryar A E and Thomas W A 2009 Geologic, geomorphic and hydrologic framework and evolution of the Bengal basin, India and Bangladesh; J. Asian Earth Sci. 34 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mukherjee A, Saha D, Harvey C F, Taylor R G, Ahmed K M and Bhanja S N 2015 Groundwater systems of the Indian sub-continent; J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 4 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rose R E, Geldreich E E and Litsky W 1975 Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis; Appl. Microbiol. 29 532–536.Google Scholar
  17. Torres-Reyna O 2007 Panel data analysis fixed and random effects using Stata (v. 4.2); Data Stat Service, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  18. Swachh Bharat Mission 2017 Gramin, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srimanti Duttagupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Animesh Bhattacharya
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abhijit Mukherjee
    • 1
    • 3
  • Siddhartha Chattopadhyay
    • 4
  • Soumendra Nath Bhanja
    • 5
  • Soumyajit Sarkar
    • 1
  • Pragnaditya Malakar
    • 3
  • Jayanta Bhattacharya
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Public Health Engineering DepartmentGovernment of West BengalKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of Geology and GeophysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  4. 4.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  5. 5.Faculty of Science and TechnologyAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  6. 6.Department of Mining EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations