Advertisement

Monazite and xenotime U–Th–Pb\(_{\mathrm{total}}\) ages from basement rocks of the (central) Shillong–Meghalaya Gneissic Complex, Northeast India

  • Pritom BorahEmail author
  • Pranjit Hazarika
  • Amulya Chandra Mazumdar
  • Mridul Rabha
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Monazite and xenotime are the two most useful and commonly used geochronometers for deciphering ages from metamorphic rocks. The low analytical cost involved in electron probe micro-analyser chemical dating, ease of sample preparation and abundance in metamorphic rocks of wide PT conditions make monazite and xenotime dating most widely used technique for age determination amongst metamorphic petrologists. This contribution presents age comparisons between coexisting monazite and xenotime in the basement metapelitic rocks of the central part of the Shillong–Meghalaya Gneissic Complex (SMGC). Thermobarometric estimates in the studied samples indicate granulite facies conditions of metamorphism with peak \({P{-}T}\) conditions of \(\sim \)6.5 kbar and \({\sim }750^\circ \hbox {C}\). Results indicate that xenotime in the basement rocks in the central SMGC formed in four discrete geological events while monazite either formed only in the latest Pan-African granulite grade metamorphic event or recrystallised during this event. Monazite in the studied samples yielded a single ubiquitous age of ca. 500 Ma. Xenotime in the study area, although found in only one sample, preserves four distinct ages at \(1153 \pm 29,930 \pm 36,823 \pm 41\; {\hbox {and}}\; 490 \pm 11\;\hbox {Ma}\). Preservation of Grenvillian ages in xenotime from central SMGC marks the eastward extension of Rodinia amalgamation front in the Indian Shield. The Neoproterozoic ages in xenotime from central SMGC suggest that the ca. 820 Ma high-grade metamorphism in the Eastern Indian Tectonic Zone had a wider impact in the SMGC than perceived previously.

Keywords

Monazite xenotime U–Th–Pb\(_{\mathrm{total}}\) dating Shillong–Meghalaya 

Notes

Acknowledgements

ACM acknowledges the partial financial support of this work from the University Grant Commission through Major Research Project (MRP) number MRP-MAJOR-GEOL-2013-36821. PB greatly acknowledges the financial support from the UGC in the form of a research fellowship. All the authors thank Prof Biswajit Mishra for facilitating EPMA analyses in the DST-IIT National EPMA facility, IIT Kharagpur. Dr M K Ozha, Ashim Patel and Saptarshi Sinha are acknowledged for their help during EPMA and SEM analyses. The optical photomicrographs were obtained using microscope-imaging facility established through DST-FIST funding (SR/FST/ESI-152/2016) to the Department of Geological Sciences, Gauhati University. We acknowledge the Editor-in-Chief Prof N V Chalapathi Rao and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped to greatly improve the paper.

Supplementary material

12040_2019_1085_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (xlsx 49 KB)
12040_2019_1085_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (xlsx 11 KB)
12040_2019_1085_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (60 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (xlsx 59 KB)
12040_2019_1085_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (xlsx 18 KB)

References

  1. Bardoloi A, Mazumdar A C and Chowdhary P K 1994 Polyphase deformation and fold geometry study of the Precambrian Gneissic Complex around Nalanga hill, Goalpara district, Assam; Indian J. Earth Sci. 21 236–246.Google Scholar
  2. Barooah B C and Goswami I D 1972 Precambrian stratigraphy of the Assam plateau; J. Mines Metals Fuels. 20 368–373.Google Scholar
  3. Bea R 1996 Residence of REE, Y, Th and U in granites and crustal protoliths; Implications for the chemistry of crustal melts; J. Petrol. 37(3) 521–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharjee C C and Baruah N C 1973 The study of joints in relation to the folding episodes in the Pre-Cambrian rocks of the Hahim area; J. Assam Sci. Soc. 16 54–62.Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya A, Mazumdar A C and Sen S K 1988 Fe–Mg mixing in cordierite: Constraints from natural data and implications for cordierite–garnet thermometry in granulites; Am. Mineral. 73 338–344.Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya A, Mohanty L, Maji A K, Sen S K and Raith M 1992 Non-ideal mixing in phlogopite–annite binary; constraints from experimental data on Mg–Fe partitioning and a reformulation of the biotite–garnet geothermometer; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 111 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bidyananda M and Deomurari M P 2007 Geochronological constraints on the evolution of Megahalaya massif, north eastern India: An ion microprobe study; Curr. Sci. 93 1620–1623.Google Scholar
  8. Boger S D, Wilson C J L and Fanning C M 2001 Early Palaeozoic tectonism within the East Antarctic craton: The final suture between east and west Gondwana?; Geology 29 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boniface N, Schenk V and Appel P 2012 Paleoproterozoic eclogites of MORB-type chemistry and three Proterozoic orogenic cycles in the Ubendian Belt (Tanzania): Evidence from monazite and zircon geochronology, and geochemistry; Precamb. Res. 192 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carson C J and Grew E S 2007 Geology of the Larsemann Hills Region Antarctica (1:25000 scale map) (1st edn), Geoscience, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Carson C J, Fanning C M and Wilson C J L 1996 Timing of the progress granite Larsemann hills: Additional evidence for early Palaeozoic orogenesis within the east Antarctic shield and implications for Gondwana assembly; Aust. J. Earth Sci. 43(5) 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson C J, Grew E S, Boger S D, Fanning C M and Christy A G 2007 Age of boron- and phosphorus-rich paragneisses and associated orthogneisses, Larsemann Hills: New constraints from SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology; In: A keystone in a changing world – Online proceedings of the 10th ISAES (eds) Cooper A K and Raymond C R et al., USGS Open File Report 2007-1047, Extended Abstract 003 4.Google Scholar
  13. Chatterjee N 2017 Constraints from monazite and xenotime growth modelling in the MnCKFMASH-PYCe system on the \(P\)\(T\) path of a metapelite from Shillong–Meghalaya Plateau: Implications for the Indian shield assembly; J. Metamor. Geol. 35 393–412.Google Scholar
  14. Chatterjee N, Mazumdar A C, Bhattacharya A and Saikia R R 2007 Mesoproterozoic granulites of the Shillong–Meghalaya Plateau: Evidence of westward continuation of the Prydz Bay Pan-African suture into Northeastern India; Precamb. Res. 152 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatterjee N, Banerjee M, Bhattacharya A and Maji A K 2010 Monazite chronology, metamorphism anatexis and tectonic relevance of the mid-Neoproterozoic Eastern Indian Tectonic Zone; Precamb. Res. 179 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chatterjee N, Bhattacharya A, Duarah B P and Mazumdar A C 2011 Late Cambrian reworking of Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic granulites in Shillong–Meghalaya Gneissic Complex (Northeast India): Evidence from PT pseudosection analysis and monazite chronology and implications for East Gondwana assembly; J. Geol. 119 311–330.Google Scholar
  17. Cherniak D J 2006 Pb and rare earth element diffusion in xenotime; Lithos 88 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chimote J S, Pandey B K, Bagchi A K, Basu A N, Gupta J N and Saraswat A C 1988 Rb–Sr whole rock isochron age from the Mylliem granite, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; In: 4th National symposium of mass spectrometry, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  19. Collins A S and Pisarevsky S A 2005 Amalgamating Eastern Gondwana: The evolution of the Circum-Indian orogens; Earth Sci. Rev. 71 229–270.Google Scholar
  20. Copeland P, Parrish R R and Harrison T M 1988 Identification of inherited radiogenic Pb in monazite and its implication for U–Pb systematics; Nature 333 760–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crawford A R 1969 India, Ceylon and Pakistan: New age data in comparison with Australia; Nature 233 380–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford A R 1974 Indo-Antarctica, Gondwana Land and pattern of the distortion of a granulite belt; Tectonophys. 22 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crowley J L, Chatterjee N, Bowring S A, Sylvester P J, Myers J S and Searle M P 2005 U–(Th)–Pb dating of monazite and xenotime by EMPA, LAICPMS, and IDTIMS: Examples from the Yilgarn Craton and Himalayas; In: Proceedings of the 15th annual Goldschmidt conference, Vol. A19 (Abstracts).Google Scholar
  24. Dash C R and Chatterjee B 1992 Geology of the Patharkhammah–Umpyrtha, East Khasi Hills district Meghalaya; Geol. Surv. India Publ. 125(4) 24–26.Google Scholar
  25. Desikachar S V 1974 A review of the tectonic and geological history of eastern India in terms of plate tectonic theory; J. Geol. Soc. India 15 137–149.Google Scholar
  26. Dirks P and Hand M 1995 Clarifying temperature–pressure paths via structures in granulite from the Bolingen Islands Antarctica; Aust. J. Earth Sci. 42(2) 157–172.Google Scholar
  27. Dutch R A, Hand M and Clark C 2005 Cambrian reworking of the southern Australian Proterozoic Curnamona Province: Constraints from regional shear-zone systems; J. Geol. Soc. London 162 763–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans P 1964 The tectonic framework of Assam; J. Geol. Soc. India 5 80–96.Google Scholar
  29. Ferry J M and Spear F S 1978 Experimental calibration of the partitioning of Fe and between biotite and garnet; Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 66 113–117.Google Scholar
  30. Fitzsimons I C W 1997 The Brattstrand paragneiss and the Sostrene orthogneiss: A review of Pan-African metamorphism and Grenvillian relics in southern Prydz Bay; In: The Antarctic region, geological evolution and processes (ed.) Ricci C A, Terra Antartica Publication, Siena, pp. 121–130.Google Scholar
  31. Fitzsimons I C W 2000 A review of tectonic events in the East Antarctic shield, and their implications for Gondwana and earlier supercontinents; J. Afr. Earth Sci. 31 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fitzsimons I C W 2003 Proterozoic basement provinces of southern and southwestern Australia, and their correlation with Antarctica; In: Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent assembly and breakup 206 (eds) Yoshida M, Windley B F and Dasgupta S; Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 206 93–130.Google Scholar
  33. Fitzsimons I C W and Harley S L 1991 Geological relationships in high-grade gneiss of the Brattstrand Bluffs Coastline, Prydz Bay East Antarctica; Aust. J. Earth Sci. 38(5) 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fitzsimons I C W, Kinny P D and Harley S L 1997 Two stages of zircon and monazite growth in anatectic leucogneiss: SHRIMP constraints on the duration and intensity of Pan-African metamorphism in Prydz Bay East Antarctica; Terra Nova 9(1) 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Förster H J 1998 The chemical composition of REE–Y–Th–U-rich accessory minerals in peraluminous granites of the Erzgebirge–Fichtelgebirge region, Germany, Part II: Xenotime; Am. Mineral. 83 1302–1315.Google Scholar
  36. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Bhalla J K, Paul D K, Sarkar A, Bishui P K and Gupta S N 1991 Geochronology and geochemistry of granite plutons from East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; J. Geol. Soc. India 37 331–342.Google Scholar
  37. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Paul D K, Bhalla J K, Bishui P K and Gupta S N 1994 New Rb–Sr isotopic ages and geochemistry of granitoids from Meghalaya and their significance in middle to late Proterozoic crustal evolution; Ind. Miner. 48 33–44.Google Scholar
  38. Ghosh S, Fallick A E, Paul D K and Potts P J 2005 Geochemistry and origin of Neoproterozoic granitoids of Meghalaya, Northeast India: Implications for linkage with amalgamation of Gondwana Supercontinent; Gondwana Res. 8 421–432.Google Scholar
  39. Gogoi K 1963 The geology of parts of the Khasi Hills along the southwestern and southeastern extension of the Sonapahar and structure of the main Sonapahar belt, Assam; Unpublished report of Geol. Surv. Intl. Prog.Google Scholar
  40. Harlov D E, Wirth R and Hetherington C J 2007 The relative stability of monazite and huttonite at 300–900\(^\circ \)C and 200–1000 MPa: Metasomatism and the propagation of metastable mineral phases; Am. Mineral. 92 1652–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hazarika P, Mishra B and Pruseth K L 2015 Diverse tourmaline compositions from orogenic gold deposits in the Hutti–Maski greenstone belt, India: Implications for sources of ore-forming fluids; Econ. Geol. 110 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hazarika P, Mishra B, Ozha M K and Pruseth K L 2017 An improved EPMA analytical protocol for U–Th–Pb\(_{\rm total}\) dating in xenotime: Age constraints from polygenetic Mangalwar Complex, Northwestern India; Chem. Erde.-Geochem. 77 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heinrich W, Andrehs G and Franz G 1997 Monazite–xenotime miscibility gap thermometry. I. An empirical calibration; J. Metamor. Geol. 15 3–16.Google Scholar
  44. Hensen B J and Zhou B 1995 A Pan-African Granulite-facies metamorphic episode in Prydz Bay Antarctica – Evidence from Sm–Nd garnet dating; Aust. J. Earth Sci. 42(3) 249–258.Google Scholar
  45. Hensen B J and Zhou B 1997 East Gondwana amalgamation by Pan-African collision? Evidence in the Prydz Bay region, East Antarctica; In: The Antarctic region, geological evolution and processes (ed.) Ricci C A, Terra Antarctica Publication, Siena, pp. 115–119.Google Scholar
  46. Hetherington C J, Jercinovic M J, Williams M L and Mahan K 2008 Understanding geologic processes with xenotime: Composition, chronology, and a protocol for electron probe microanalysis; Chem. Geol. 254 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holdaway M J 2001 Recalibration of the GASP geobarometer in light of recent garnet and plagioclase activity models and versions of the garnet–biotite geothermometer; Am. Mineral. 86 1117–1129.Google Scholar
  48. Holdaway M J and Lee S M 1977 Fe–Mg cordierite stability in high grade pelitic rocks based on experimental, theoretical and natural observations; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 63 175–198.Google Scholar
  49. Holdsworth R E, Handa M, Miller J A and Buick I S 2001 Continental reactivation and reworking: An introduction; Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 184 1–12.Google Scholar
  50. Kelly N M, Clarke G L and Fanning C M 2002 A two-stage evolution of the Neoproterozoic Rayner structural episode: New U–Pb sensitive high resolution ion microprobe constraints from the Oygarden Group, Kemp Land, East Antarctica; Precamb. Res. 116 307–330.Google Scholar
  51. Kelsey D E, Powell R, Wilson C J L and Steele D A 2003 (Th + U)–Pb monazite ages from Al–Mg-rich metapelites, Rauer Group East Antarctica; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 146(3) 326–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kelsey D E, Hand M, Clark C and Wilson C J L 2007 On the application of in-situ monazite chemical geochronology to constraining \(P\)\(T\)\(t \) histories in high-temperature (\(>850^\circ \text{ C }\)) polymetamorphic granulites from Prydz Bay, east Antarctica; J. Geol. Soc. London 164 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelsey D E, Wade B P, Collins A S, Hand M, Sealing C R and Netting A 2008 Discovery of a Neoproterozoic basin in the Prydz belt in East Antarctica and its implications for Gondwana assembly and ultrahigh temperature metamorphism; Precamb. Res. 161 355–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kinny P D, Black L P and Sheraton J W 1993 Zircon ages and the distribution of Archean and Proterozoic rocks in the Rauer Islands; Antarctic Sci. 5(2) 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kretz R 1983 Symbols for rock-forming minerals; Am. Mineral. 68 277–279.Google Scholar
  56. Kumar S, Rino V, Hayasaka Y, Kimura K, Raju S, Terada K and Pathak M 2017 Contribution of Columbia and Gondwana supercontinent assembly and growth-related magmatism in the evolution of the Meghalaya Plateau and the Mikir Hills, Northeast India: Constraints from U–Pb SHRIMP zircon geochronology and geochemistry; Lithos 277 356–377.Google Scholar
  57. Lal R K, Ackermand D, Seifert F and Haldar S K 1978 Chemographic relationships in sapphirine-bearing rocks from Sonapahar, Assam, India; Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 67 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li Z X, Bogdanova S V, Collins A S, Davidson A, De Waele B, Ernst R E, Fitzsimons I C W, Fuck R A, Gladkochub D P, Jacobs J, Karlstrom K E, Lu S, Natapov L M, Pease V, Pisarevsky S A, Thrane K and Vernikovsky V 2008 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis; Precamb. Res. 160 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu X C, Jahn B M, Zhao Y, Zhao G and Liu X H 2007a Geochemistry and geochronology of high-grade rocks from the Grove Mountains, East Antarctica: Evidence for an Early Neoproterozoic basement metamorphosed during a single Late Neoproterozoic/Cambrian tectonic cycle; Precamb. Res. 158 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu X C, Zhao Y, Zhao G, Jian P and Xu G 2007b Petrology and geochronology of granulites from the McKaskle Hills, eastern Amery Ice Shelf, Antarctica, and implications for the evolution of the Prydz Belt; J. Petrol. 48 1443–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ludwig K R 2012 Isoplot 4.15: A geochronological toolkit for microsoft excel; Berkeley Chronological Center, Special Publication, Berkeley, California, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
  62. Mazumdar S K 1976 A summary of the Precambrian Geology of Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; Geol. Surv. India Misc. Publ. 23(2) 311–334.Google Scholar
  63. Mitra S K 1998 Structural history of the rocks of the Shillong group around Sohiong, east Khasi hills, Meghalaya; Indian J. Geol. 70 123–131.Google Scholar
  64. Motoyoshi Y, Thost D E and Hensen B J 1991 Reaction textures in calc-silicate granulites from the Bolingen Islands, Prydz Bay, East Antarctica; implications for the retrograde \(P\)\(T \) path; J. Metamor. Geol. 9(3) 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nichols G T and Berry R F 1991 A decompressional \(P\)\(T \) path, Reinbolt Hills, East Antarctica. J. Metamor. Geol. 9 257–266.Google Scholar
  66. Parrish R R 1990 U–Pb dating of monazite and its application to geological problems; Can. J. Earth Sci. 27 1431–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pouchou J L and Pichoir F 1984 A new model for quantitative X-ray microanalyses, Part I: Application to the analyses of homogenous samples; Recherche Aerosp. 3 13–36.Google Scholar
  68. Powell C M and Pisarevsky S A 2002 Late Neoproterozoic assembly of East Gondwana; Geology 30 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Putnis A 2002 Mineral replacement reactions: From macroscopic observations to microscopic mechanisms; Mineral Mag. 66 689–708.Google Scholar
  70. Rasmussen B 1996 Early-diagenetic REE-phosphate minerals (florencite, gorceixite, crandallite, and xenotime) in marine sandstones: A major sink for oceanic phosphorus; Am. J. Sci. 296 601–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schenk V, Appel P, Jöns N, Loose D, Schumann A and Wegner H 2005 Pan-African reworking of the northeastern corner of the Congo Craton in Uganda; In: Supercontinents and earth evolution symposium (eds) Wingate M T D and Pisarevsky S A, Geol. Soc. Australia 100 81.Google Scholar
  72. Spear F S 1993 Metamorphic phase equilibria and pressure-temperature-time paths; Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC, 799p.Google Scholar
  73. Spear F and Pyle J 2002 Apatite, monazite, and xenotime in metamorphic rocks; In: Phosphates: Geochemical, geobiological, and materials importance. Reviews in mineralogy and geochemistry (eds) Kohn M L, Rakovan J and Hughes J M, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, pp. 293–335.Google Scholar
  74. Spear F S, Pyle J M and Cherniak D 2009 Limitations of chemical dating of monazite; Chem. Geol. 266 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suzuki K and Adachi M 1991 Precambrian provenance and Silurian metamorphism of the Tsubonosawa paragneiss in the South Kitakami terrane, Northeast Japan, revealed by the chemical Th–U–total Pb isochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime; Geochem. J. 25 357–376.Google Scholar
  76. Suzuki K and Kato T 2008 CHIME dating of monazite, xenotime, zircon and polycrase: Protocol, pitfalls and chemical criterion of possibly discordant age data; Gondwana Res. 14 569–586.Google Scholar
  77. Torsvik T H, Carter L M, Ashwal L D, Bhusan S K, Pandit M K and Jamtveit B 2001 Rodinia refined or obscured; palaeomagnetism of the Malani igneous suite; Precamb. Res. 108 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Breemen O, Bowes D R, Bhattacharjee C C and Chowdhary P K 1989 Late Proterozoic–Early Paleozoic Rb–Sr whole rock and mineral ages for granite and pegmatite, Goalpara, Assam, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 34 89–92.Google Scholar
  79. Wang Y, Liu D, Ren L and Williams I S 2005 Geochemical characteristics and ion microprobe age of the mafic granulites from the Larsemann Hills, east Antarctica; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69(10) A292 (Suppl.).Google Scholar
  80. Wang Y, Tong L and Liu D 2007 Zircon U–Pb ages from an ultra-high temperature metapelite, Rauer Group, east Antarctica: Implications for overprints by Grenvillian and Pan-African events. In: A keystone in a changing world – Online proceedings of the 10th ISAES, USGS Open File Report 2007-1047 (eds) Cooper A K and Raymond C R, Short Research Paper 023 4.Google Scholar
  81. Wark D A and Miller C F 1993 Accessory mineral behavior during differentiation of a granite suite: Monazite, xenotime, and zircon in the Sweetwater Wash pluton, southwestern California, USA; Chem. Geol. 110(1–3) 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wells P R A and Richardson S W 1980 Thermal evolution of metamorphic rocks in the Central Highlands of Scotland; In: Caledonides of the British Isles – Reviewed (eds) Harris A L, Holland C H and Leake B E, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 8 339–344.Google Scholar
  83. Williams M L, Jercinovic M J and Hetherington C J 2007 Microprobe monazite geochronology: Understanding geologic processes by integrating composition and chronology; Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35 137–175.Google Scholar
  84. Wu C M, Zhang J and Ren L D 2004 Empirical garnet–biotite–plagioclase–quartz (GBPQ) geobarometry in medium- to high-grade metapelites; J. Petrol. 45 1907–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yin A, Dubey C S, Webb A A G, Kelty T K, Grove M, Gehrels G E and Burgess W P 2010 Geologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen and Indian Craton: Part I. Structural geology, U–Pb zircon geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the Shillong Plateau and its neighbouring regions in Northeast India; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 122 336–359.Google Scholar
  86. Zhao Y, Song B, Wang Y, Ren L and Chen T 1992 Geochronology of the late granite in the Larsemann Hills, east Antarctica; In: Recent progress in Antarctic Earth Science (eds) Yoshida Y, Kaminuma K and Shiraishi K, Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo, pp. 155–161Google Scholar
  87. Zhao Y, Liu X H, Song B, Zhang Z Q, Li J L, Yao Y P and Wang Y B 1995 Constraints on the stratigraphic age of metasedimentary rocks from the Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica: Possible implications for Neoproterozoic tectonics; Precamb. Res. 75(3/4) 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pritom Borah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pranjit Hazarika
    • 1
  • Amulya Chandra Mazumdar
    • 1
  • Mridul Rabha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesGauhati UniversityGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyPragjyotish CollegeGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations