Advertisement

Estimating shear wave velocity of soil using standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts in Mashhad city

  • Omolbanin AtaeeEmail author
  • Naser Hafezi Moghaddas
  • Gholam Reza Lashkaripour
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the correlation between shear wave velocity (\(V_{\mathrm{S}}\)) and standard penetration test blow counts (SPT-N value) in all soil types, gravelly soil, sandy soil and clayey soil for Mashhad city in the north eastern region of Iran. The \(V_{\mathrm{S}}\) data used were measured through downhole method in 84 construction projects (in 88 boreholes). From among collected data, 424 pairs of \(V_{\mathrm{S}}\)-SPT recorded in one depth were used for regression analysis. The obtained results showed that the N-value had a critical role in estimating \(V_{\mathrm{S}}\) and soil type was less effective in this regard. These findings are in line with the findings of the previous studies. Regression equations obtained in this study were compared with correlations from previous studies. There was a relative similarity between the previously published and the new regression equations for Iranian soils. Although almost all correlations follow a similar trend, there are significant differences between new equations and correlations reported for other countries. The regression coefficients of the new equations show the acceptable capability of the suggested correlations in estimating \(V_{\mathrm{S}}\) through SPT-N value. Therefore, these equations can be used to estimate \(V_{\mathrm{S}}\) for the soils of the current study area and for other similar areas. Moreover, \(V_{\mathrm{S30}}\) was used for site classification of the study area as per National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) guidelines and it was shown that a major portion of the city comes under site class C and other locations are categorised as site class D.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate cooperation from consulting engineering companies and soil mechanics laboratories in Mashhad city for providing their geotechnical reporting for use in this paper. They also acknowledge the kind cooperation from the Zamin Physic Pouya consulting engineering company for giving permission to use measured shear wave velocity.

References

  1. Akbari M, Ghafoori M, Hafezi Moghaddas N and Lashkaripour G L 2011 Seismic microzonation of Mashhad city, northeast Iran; Ann. Geophys.-Italy  54(4) 424–434;  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4771.
  2. Akin M K, Kramer S L and Topal T 2011 Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (\(V_{S}\)) and penetration resistance (SPT-\(N\) value) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa–Turkey); Eng. Geol. 119 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolidis P I, Raptakis D G, Pandi K K, Manakou M V and Pitilakis K D 2006 Definition of subsoil structure and preliminary ground response in Aigion city (Greece) using microtremor and earthquakes; Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 26 922–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM-D7400 2008 Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing; ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. ASTM-D1586 2011 Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split-barrel sampling of soils; ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Athanasopoulos G A 1995 Empirical correlations V\(_{{\rm So}}\)–NSPT for soils of Greece: A comparative study of reliability; In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, Computation Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
  7. Azadi A, Javan-Doloei G H, Hafezi Moghadas N and Hessami-Azar K 2010 Geological, geotechnical and geophysical characteristics of the Toos Fault located North of Mashhad, North-eastern Iran; J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35(4) 17–34 (in Persian).Google Scholar
  8. Baziar M H, Fallah H, Razeghi H R and Khorasani M M 1998 The relation of shear wave velocity and SPT for soils in Iran; In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  9. Berberian M and Ghoreshi M 1989 Seismic-fault hazard and project engineering of thermal power plant of Nishapur; Seismotectonical Survey, Ministry of Energy, Power Engineering Corporation report (Moshanir), Tehran (in Persian).Google Scholar
  10. Borcherdt R D 1994 Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification); Earthq. Spectra. 10(4) 617–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown L T, Diehl J G and Nigbor R L 2000 A simplified procedure to measure average shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 meters (V\(_{{\rm S30}}\)); In: 12th World conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  12. BSSC 2001 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 368); Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Chatterjee K and Choudhury D 2013 Variations in shear wave velocity and soil site class in Kolkata city using regression and sensitivity analysis; Nat. Hazards  69 2057–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dikmen U 2009 Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils; J. Geophys. Eng. 6 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fabbrocino S, Lanzano G, Forte G, Santucci de Magistris F and Fabbroccini G 2015 SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy); Eng. Geol. 187 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hafezi Moghaddas N, Azadi A and Amanian M 2010 Assessment of shear wave velocity based on standard penetration and accuracy of the results in the range of Mashhad City; In: Fourteenth Conference of Iran Geophysics, Geophysical Institute (in Persian).Google Scholar
  17. Hardin B and Richart F 1963 Elastic wave velocities in granular soils; J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE 89(1) 33–65.Google Scholar
  18. Hasancebi N and Ulusay R 2007 Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments; Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 66 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holzer T L, Padovani A C, Bennett M J, Noce T E and Tinsely J C 2005 Mapping \(V_{{\rm S30}}\) site classes; Earthq. Spectra. 21 335–370.Google Scholar
  20. Imai T 1977 P- and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan; In: Proceedings of the IX, International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 127–132.Google Scholar
  21. Imai T and Tonouchi K 1982 Correlation of \(N\) value with \(S\)-wave velocity and shear modulus; In: Proc. 2nd European Symp. on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
  22. Imai T and Yoshimura Y 1970 Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil; Tsuchito-Kiso  18(1) 17–22 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  23. Imai T and Yoshimura Y 1975 The relation of mechanical properties of soils to P and S-wave velocities for ground in Japan; Technical Note, OYO Corporation.Google Scholar
  24. Inazaki T 2006 Relationship between S-wave velocities and geotechnical properties of alluvial sediments; In: Proceedings of the 19th EEGS symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems 2006, pp. 1296–1303.Google Scholar
  25. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Building 2005; 3rd revision (Standard No. 2800), Building and Housing Research Center.Google Scholar
  26. Iyisan R 1996 Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test results. Chamber of Civil Engineers of Turkey; Tek Dergi. 7(2) 1187–1199.Google Scholar
  27. Jafari M K, Asghari A and Rahmani I 1997 Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (\(V_S\)) and SPT \(N\) value for south of Tehran soils; In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Civil Engineering, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
  28. Jafari M K, Shafiee A and Razm khah A 2002 Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran; Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 4 25–35.Google Scholar
  29. Jinan Z 1987 Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of SPT and depth; Selected papers from the Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, pp. 92–100.Google Scholar
  30. Kanai K 1966 Observation of microtremors, XI: Matsushiro earthquake swarm areas, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Vol. XLIV(3), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  31. Kayen R E, Mitchell J K, Seed R B, Lodge A, Nishio S and Coutinho R 1992 Evaluation of SPT, CPT, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data; In: Proceedings of the fourth Japan–US workshop on earthquake-resistant design of lifeline facilities and counter measures for soil liquefaction, NCEER-90-0019 (eds) Hamada I M and O’Rourke T D, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, NY, Vol. 1, pp. 177–204.Google Scholar
  32. Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A and Erkan A 2001 In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey; In: Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp. 259–265.Google Scholar
  33. Kramer S L 1996 Geotechnical earthquake engineering; Prentice Hall Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Series, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 653p.Google Scholar
  34. Lang D H and Schwarz J 2006 Instrumental subsoil classification of Californian strong-motion sites based on single-station measurements; In: Eighth U.S. national conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Lee S H H 1990 Regression models of shear wave velocities; J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 13 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee S H H 1992 Analysis of the multicollinearity of regression equations of shear wave velocities; Soils Found. 32(1) 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liao S S C and Whitman R V 1986 Catalogue of liquefaction and non-liquefaction occurrences during earthquakes; Research Rep. Prepared for Dept. of Civil Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Maheshwari R U, Boominathan A and Dodagoudar G R 2010 Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils; Geotech. Geol. Eng. 28 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin A J and Diehl J G 2004 Practical experience using a simplified procedure to measure average shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 meters (\(V_{{\rm S30}} \)); In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Mhaske S Y and Choudhury D 2011 Geospatial contour mapping of shear wave velocity for Mumbai city; Nat. Hazards 59 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohba S and Toriuma I 1970 Research on vibrational characteristics of soil deposits in Osaka. Part 2: On velocities of wave propagation and predominant periods of soil deposits. Abstracts of Technical Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan.Google Scholar
  42. Ohsaki Y and Iwasaki R 1973 On dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits; Soils Found. 13(4) 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohta Y and Goto N 1978 Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes; Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ohta T, Hara A, Niwa M and Sakano T 1972 Elastic moduli of soil deposits estimated by \(N\)-values; In: Proc. 7th annual conference, The Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 265–268.Google Scholar
  45. Pitilakis K D, Anastasiadis A and Raptakis D 1992 Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits; In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Rotherdam, pp. 1275–1280.Google Scholar
  46. Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis K, Tika-Vassilikou T and Jongmans D 1999 Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using field, and laboratory tests and moderate strong ground motions; J. Earthq. Eng. 3(3) 381–409.Google Scholar
  47. Rahimi E, Nikoudel M R, Hafezi Moghaddas N and Ghayamghamian M R 2012 Evaluating local geological conditions and \(V_{S}\) profiles in Khash area, SE Iran; Science Series Data Report, Vol 4, No. 12.Google Scholar
  48. Raptakis D G, Anastasiadis S A J, Pitilakis K D and Lontzetidis K S 1995 Shear wave velocities and damping of Greek natural soils; In: Proc. 10th European Conf. Earthquake Engg., Vienna, pp. 477–482.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson P K and Wride C E 1998 Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test; Can. Geotech. J. Ottawa 35(3) 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rollins K M, Evans M D, Diehl N B and Daily W D 1998 Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels; J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(5) 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seed H B and Idriss I M 1981 Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes; In: Preprint 81–544, in-situ testing to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, Missouri, pp. 81–544.Google Scholar
  52. Seed H B and Idriss I M 1982 Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Monograph, No. 5; Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  53. Seed H B, Idriss I M and Arango I 1983 Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data; J. Geotech. Eng. 109(3) 458–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sherif Aggour M and Rose Radding W 2001 Standard penetration test (SPT) correction, research report, Maryland state highway administration, office of policy and research; Report No. MD02-007B48.Google Scholar
  55. Shibata T 1970 The Relationship between the N-Value and S-Wave Velocity in the Soil Layer; Disaster Prevention Research Laboratory, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  56. Sil A and Sitharam T G 2013 Dynamic site characterization and correlation of shear wave velocity with standard penetration test ‘N’ values for the city of Agartala, Tripura state, India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 171(8),  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0754-y.
  57. Sisman H 1995 An Investigation on Relationships between Shear Wave Velocity, and SPT and Pressuremeter Test Results, Master of Science Thesis, Ankara University, Turkey.Google Scholar
  58. Sitharam T G and Anbazhagan P 2007 Seismic hazard analysis for the Bangalore region; Nat. Hazards 40 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sitharam T G and Anbazhagan P 2008 Seismic Microzonation: Principles, Practices and Experiments, EJGE Special Volume Bouquet 08, http://www.ejge.com/Bouquet08/Preface.htm, P-61.
  60. Skempton A K 1986 Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging, and overconsolidation; Geotechnique 36(3) 425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sykora D E and Stokoe K H 1983 Correlations of in-situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity; Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 20 125–36.Google Scholar
  62. Ulugergerli E U and Uyanik O 2007 Statistical correlations between seismic wave velocities and SPT blow counts and the relative density of soils; J. Test Eval. 35(2) 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams R A, Wood S, Stephenson W J, Odum J K, Mere Monte M E, Street R and Worley D 2003 Surface seismic refraction/reflection measurement determinations of potential site resonances and the areal uniformity of NEHRP site class D in Memphis, Tennessee; Earthq. Spectra 19 159–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Youd T L and Idriss I M 2001 Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils; J. Geotech. Geoenviron. 127(4).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omolbanin Ataee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Naser Hafezi Moghaddas
    • 2
  • Gholam Reza Lashkaripour
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MazandaranBabolsarIran
  2. 2.Faculty of GeologyFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations