Roundness of survivor clasts as a discriminator for melting and crushing origin of fault rocks: A reappraisal
- 35 Downloads
Roundness of survivor clasts (mineral/rock fragments) in fault rocks (e.g., pseudotachylyte and cataclasite/gouge) has been used by some workers to distinguish melt-origin from crush-origin of such rocks. Keeping in view the large overlap in the published data on the roundness of fault rocks, the reliability of such a discriminator appears somewhat uncertain. The present study attempts to reappraise the aforesaid criterion through roundness analysis of quartz and feldspar clasts in melting-dominated pseudotachylyte (M-Pt), crushing-dominated pseudotachylyte (C-Pt) and fault-related cataclasite (F-Ct) collected from Sarwar–Junia Fault Zone in Rajasthan and from Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone in central India. Our analysis shows that roundness of clasts cannot reliably distinguish between fault rocks of melt-origin and crush-origin (especially M-Pt and F-Ct) as the roundness values overlap and a distinct limit of roundness value for each rock type cannot be established. While the roundness of clasts in M-Pt and C-Pt may be enhanced due to melt-induced rounding off of the initially angular clasts, rounding of clasts can also occur by abrasion during rolling of crushed material in F-Ct. Furthermore, anomalous thermal expansion of clasts in melt-origin pseudotachylyte may cause disintegration of larger clasts into smaller angular fragments, thereby increasing the percentage of angular clasts in melt-origin fault rocks. Therefore, roundness of survivor clasts cannot be solely used as a discriminator between melt-origin and crush-origin fault rocks.
KeywordsPseudotachylyte cataclasite survivor clasts roundness melting
This work was supported by a UGC-MRP Grant (F. No. 42-66/2013 (SR)) and partially by a Delhi University Faculty R&D Grant (No. RC/2014/6820) awarded to AC. AS was supported through the aforesaid UGC project fellowship. Microscopy and software facility were provided by the Department of Geology, University of Delhi.
- Chester F M, Evans J P and Biegel R 1993 Internal structure and weakening mechanisms of the San Andreas Fault; J. Geophys. Res. 100 13,007–13,020.Google Scholar
- Gupta S N, Arora Y K, Mathur R K, Iqbaluddin B P, Sahai, T N, Sharma S B and Murthy M V N 1980 Lithostratigraphic map of Aravalli region, southern Rajasthan and northeastern Gujarat; Geol. Surv. India, Calcutta.Google Scholar
- Heron A M 1953 The geology of central Rajputana; Gov. India Press 79(1) 1–389.Google Scholar
- Kirkpatrick J D, Dobson K J, Mark D F, Shipton Z K, Brodsky E E and Stuart F M 2012 The depth of pseudotachylyte formation from detailed thermo-chronology and constraints on coseismic stress drop variability; J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117B6.Google Scholar
- Lofgren G 1980 Experimental studies on the dynamic crystallization of silica melts; In: Physical magmatic process (ed.) Hargraves R B, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 487–551.Google Scholar
- Reimold W U and Gibson R L 2005 ‘Pseudotachylite’ in large impact structures; In: Impact tectonics (eds) Koeberl C and Henkel H, Impact Studies Series, No. 6, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar