Advertisement

The age of the Nodular Limestone Formation (Late Cretaceous), Narmada Basin, central India

  • Susheel Kumar
  • Deo Brat Pathak
  • Bindhyachal Pandey
  • Anand Kumar Jaitly
  • Jai Prakash Gautam
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The age of the marine Nodular Limestone Formation of the Bagh Group is refined at Substage level through ammonoid and inoceramid index taxa. The study is based on the fresh collections from three well-defined successive intervals (Lower Karondia, Upper Karondia and Chirakhan members) of this formation having excellent exposures in different localities of the Narmada Basin, central India. The first record of the widely distributed Turonian ammonoid genera Spathites Kummel and Decker and Collignoniceras Breistroffer from the Nodular Limestone Formation constrained its age exclusively to Turonian. The Early Turonian species Spathites (Jeanrogericeras) aff. revelieranus (Courtiller) and Mytiloides labiatus (Sclotheim) occur in the lower part, while the Middle Turonian marker Collignoniceras cf. carolinum (d’Obrbigny) and Inoceramus hobetsensis (Nagao and Matsumoto) occurs in the upper part of the Karondia Member. The record of the index species Inoceramus teshioensis (Nagao and Matsumoto) in association with Placenticeras mintoi Vredenburg from Chirakhan Member allows a definite Late Turonian age. The present contribution is an attempt to resolve the controversies in the age of the Nodular Limestone Formation and also demarcation of the three divisions (Early, Middle and Late) of the Turonian Stage in the Narmada Basin, central India.

Keywords

Nodular Limestone Formation ammonoids inoceramid bivalves Turonian Narmada Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Geology for providing facilities of research work. One of the authors (S K) thankfully acknowledges the CSIR, New Delhi for the financial support in the form of JRF (CSIR) and SRF (RGNF, UGC). The authors are also thankful to the two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions, which helped them considerably in enhancing the quality of the paper.

References

  1. Acharya S K and Lahiri T C 1991 Cretaceous palaeogeography of the Indian sub-continent: A review; Cret. Res. 12 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar K and Khan D A 1997 A tidal island model for carbonate sedimentation: Karondia limestone of Cretaceous Narmada basin; J. Geol. Soc. India 50 481–490.Google Scholar
  3. Badve R M and Ghare M A 1977 Palaeoecological aspects of the Bagh Beds: India; Rec. Res. Geol. 4 388–402.Google Scholar
  4. Bardhan S, Gangopadhyay T K and Mandal U 2002 How far did India drift during the Late Cretaceous? Placenticeras kaffrarium Etheridge, 1904 (Ammonoidea) used as a measuring tape; Sedim. Geol. 147 193–217.Google Scholar
  5. Biswas S K 1987 Regional tectonic framework structure and evolution of western marginal basins of India; Tectonophys. 135 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanford W T 1869 Geology of the area between Tapti and Narmada valley and the adjoining districts of the Malwa and Gujarat; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 6 1–222.Google Scholar
  7. Bose P N 1884 Geology of the lower Narbada valley between Nimawar and Kawant; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 21 1–72.Google Scholar
  8. Chiplonkar G W and Ghare M A 1976 Palaeontology of Bagh Beds – Part VII: Ammonoidea; Bull. Earth Sci. 4–5 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Chiplonkar G W, Badve R M and Ghare M A 1977 On the stratigraphy of the Bagh Beds of the lower Narbada valley; In: Proceedings of the IVth Colloquium on Indian Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy (eds) Venkayachala B S and Sastri V V, Institute of Petroleum Exploration, Dehra Dun, 209–216.Google Scholar
  10. Ion J, Antonescu E, Melinite M C and Szasz L 2004 Integrated biostratigraphy of the Turonian of Romania; Acta Palaeontol. Romaniae 4 151–161.Google Scholar
  11. Jafar S A 1982 Nanoplankton evidence of Turonian transgression along Narmada Valley, India and Turonian–Coniacian boundary problem; J. Palaeontol. Soc. India 27 17–30.Google Scholar
  12. Jaitly A K and Ajane R 2013 Comments on Placenticeras mintoi (Vredenburg, 1906) from the Bagh Beds (Late Cretaceous), central India with special reference to Turonian Nodular Limestone Horizon; J. Geol. Soc. India 81 565–574.Google Scholar
  13. Kennedy W J and Gale A S 2016 Turonian ammonites from northwestern Aquitaine, France; Cret. Res. 58 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kennedy W J, Phansalkar V G and Walaszczyk I 2003 Prionocyclus germari (Reuss 1845), a Late Turonian marker fossil from the Bagh Beds of central India; Cret. Res. 24(4) 433–438.Google Scholar
  15. Khosla A, Kapur V V, Sereno P C, Wilson J A, Wilson G P, Dutheil D, Sahni A, Singh M P, Kumar S and Rana R S 2003 First dinosaur remains from the Cenomanian–Turonian Nimar Sandstone (Bagh Beds), District-Dhar, Madhya Pradesh, India; J. Palaeontol. Soc. India 48 115–127.Google Scholar
  16. Kumar S, Singh M P and Mohabey D M 1999 Lameta and Bagh Beds, central India, Field Guide; J. Palaeontol. Soc. India, 48p.Google Scholar
  17. Kundal P and Sanganwar B N 1998 Stratigraphical, palaeogeographical and palaeoenvironmental significance of fossil calcareous algae from Nimar Sandstone Formation, Bagh Group (Cenomanian–Turonian) of Pipaldehla, Jhabua, MP; Curr. Sci. 75(7) 702–703.Google Scholar
  18. Nagao T and Matsumoto T 1939 A monograph of the Cretaceous Inoceramus of Japan. Part 1; J. Fac. Sci., Hokkaido Imperial University Series 4, 4(3–4) 241–299.Google Scholar
  19. Racey R, Fisher J, Bailey H and Roy S K 2016 The value of fieldwork in making connections between onshore outcrops and offshore models: An example from India; In: The value of outcrop studies in reducing subsurface uncertainty and risk in hydrocarbon exploration and production (eds) Bowman M, Smyth H R, Good T R, Passey S R, Hirst J P P and Jordan C J, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ436,  https://doi.org/10.1144/SP436.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith A B 2010 The Cretaceous Bagh formation, India: A Gondwana window onto Turonian shallow water echinoid faunas; Cret. Res31 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor P and Badve R M 1995 A new cheilostome bryzoan from the Cretaceous of India and Europe: A cyclostomes homeomorph; Palaeontology 38(3) 627–657.Google Scholar
  22. Tripathi S C 2006 Geology and evolution of the Cretaceous Infratreppean basins of lower Narmada valley, western India; J. Geol. Soc. India 67 459–468.Google Scholar
  23. Wilmsen M and Nagm E 2013 Upper Cenomanian–lower Turonian ammonoids from the Saxonian Cretaceous (lower Elbtal Group, Saxony, Germany); Bull. Geosci. 88(3) 647–674.Google Scholar
  24. Wright C W, Calloman J H and Howarth M K 1996 Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part L, Mollusca 4 revised (Cretaceous Ammonoidea), Geological Society of America; Boulder and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 362p.Google Scholar
  25. Zonova D T and Yazykova E A 1998 Biostratigraphy and correlation of the Turonian–Coniacian succession and the Turonian–Coniacian boundary problem in the Far East Russia based on ammonites and inoceramids; Acta Geol. Polonica 48(4) 483–494.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susheel Kumar
    • 1
  • Deo Brat Pathak
    • 1
  • Bindhyachal Pandey
    • 1
  • Anand Kumar Jaitly
    • 1
  • Jai Prakash Gautam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology, Stratigraphy and Invertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, Center of Advanced StudyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations