An approach of understanding acid volcanics and tuffaceous volcaniclastics from field studies: A case from Tadpatri Formation, Proterozoic Cuddapah basin, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Sukanta Goswami
  • P K Upadhyay
  • Sangeeta Bhagat
  • Syed Zakaulla
  • A K Bhatt
  • V Natarajan
  • Sukanta Dey
Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

The lower stratigraphic part of the Cuddapah basin is marked by mafic and felsic volcanism. Tadpatri Formation consists of a greater variety of rock types due to bimodal volcanism in the upper part. Presence of bimodal volcanism is an indication of continental rift setting. Various genetic processes involved in the formation of such volcanic sequence result in original textures which are classified into volcaniclastic and coherent categories. Detailed and systematic field works in Tadpatri–Tonduru transect of SW Cuddapah basin have provided information on the physical processes producing this diversity of rock types. Felsic volcanism is manifested here with features as finger print of past rhyolite-dacite eruptions. Acid volcanics, tuffs and associated shale of Tadpatri Formation are studied and mapped in the field. With supporting subordinate studies on geochemistry, mineralogy and petrogenesis of the volcanics to validate field features accurately, it is understood that volcanism was associated with rifting and shallow marine environmental condition. Four facies (i.e., surge, flow, fall and resedimented volcaniclastic) are demarcated to describe stratigraphic units and volcanic history of the mapped area. The present contribution focuses on the fundamental characterization and categorization of field-based features diagnostic of silica-rich volcanic activities in the Tadpatri Formation.

Keywords

Acid volcanics Cuddapah basin Tadpatri Formation tuff 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Shri L K Nanda, Honourable Director, AMD for encouragement and infrastructure support to publish the part of the assigned work. They are also thankful to the respected reviewers for the immensely helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Best M G 2003 Igneous and metamorphic petrology; 2nd edn, Blackwell Science Ltd. ISBN 1-40510-588-7.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaskar Rao Y J, Pantulu G V C, Damodar Reddy V and Gopalan K 1995 Time of early sedimentation and volcanism in the Proterozoic Cuddapah basin, south India: Evidence from Rb–Sr age of Pulivendla mafic sill; Geol. Soc. India Memoir 33 329–338.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer T S, Ahall K, Menuge J F, Storey C D and Parrish R R 2004 Mesoproterozoic bimodal volcanism in SW Norway, evidence for recurring pre-Sveconorwegian continental margin tectonism; Precamb. Res. 134 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham C W 1983 Deep submarine pyroclastic eruptions; Econ. Geol. Monograph 5 142–148.Google Scholar
  5. Chatterjee N and Bhattacharji S 2001 Petrology, geochemistry and tectonic settings of the mafic dikes and sills associated with the evolution of the Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin of south India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 110(4) 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty K, Mukhopadhyay P K and Pankaj P 2016 Magmatism in Western Cuddapahs: The mafic sills and lava flows of Vempalle and Tadpatri Formations; J. Geol. Soc. India 87(6) 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher R V 1960 Classification of volcanic breccias; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 71 973–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gifkins C, Herrmann W and Large R R 2005 Altered volcanic rocks – A guide to description and interpretation; Hobart, Tasmania, Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, 275p.Google Scholar
  9. Goswami S, Bhattacharjee P, Bhagat S, Suresh Kumar and Zakaulla S 2015 Petrography of chert nodules in stromatolitic dolostone of Vempalle Formation, along Tummalapalle – Motnutalapalle, Cuddapah Basin, India, Indian J. Geosci. 69 13–24.Google Scholar
  10. Geological Survey of India 1981 Explanatory brochure on Geological and Mineral Map of Cuddapah Basin, 121p.Google Scholar
  11. Iddings J P 1887 The nature and origin of lithophysae and the lamination of acid lavas; Am. J. Sci. 33 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Irvine T N and Barager W R A 1971 A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks; Canadian J. Earth Sci. 8 523–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ishikawa Y, Sawaguchi T, Iwaya S and Horiuchi M 1976 Delineation of prospecting targets for Kuroko deposits based on modes of volcanism of underlying dacite and alteration halos; Mining Geol. 26 105–117 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  14. Maria A and Hermes O D 2001 Volcanic rocks in the Narragansett Basin, southeastern New England: Petrology and significance to early basin formation; Am. J. Sci. 301 286–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McLennan S M, Hemming S, McDanniel D K and Hanson G N 1993 Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance and tectonics; In: Processes controlling the composition of clastic sediments (eds) Johnsson M J and Basu A, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper 285 21–40.Google Scholar
  16. Nagaraja Rao B K, Rajurkar S T, Ramalingaswami G and Ravindra Babu B 1987 Stratigraphy, structure and evolution of Cuddapah basin; In: Purana basins of peninsular India (ed.) Radhakrishna B P, Geol. Soc. India Memoir 6 33–86.Google Scholar
  17. Nemeth K and Martin U 2007 Practical volcanology: Lecture notes for understanding volcanic rocks from field based studies; Geological Institute of Hungary, Budapest, ISBN 978-963-671-259-4.Google Scholar
  18. Nesbitt H W and Young G M 1982 Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites; Nature 299 715–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramam P K and Murty V N 1997 Geology of Andhra Pradesh; Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 245p.Google Scholar
  20. Ross C S 1941 Origin and geometric form of chalcedony-filled spherulites from Oregon; Am. Mineral. 26 727–732.Google Scholar
  21. Sesha Sai V V 2011 Petrology and mineral chemistry of picrite sill from Peddakudala–Velpula area, in southwestern part of the Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, India; In: Dyke swarms: Keys for geodynamic interpretation (ed.) Srivastava R K, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 115–124, ISBN-978-3-642-12496-9.Google Scholar
  22. Simpson E S W 1954 On the graphical representation of differentiation trends in igneous rocks; Geol. Magazine 91 238–244.Google Scholar
  23. Sparks R S J 1978a The dynamics of bubble formation and growth in magmas: A review and analysis; Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 3 1–37.Google Scholar
  24. Sparks R S J 1978b Gas release rates from pyroclastic flows: An assessment of the role of fluidisation in their emplacement; Bull. Volcanol. 41 1–9.Google Scholar
  25. Tamura Y and Tatsumi Y 2002 Remelting of an andesitic crust as a possible origin for Rhyolitic magma in oceanic arcs: An example from the Izu–Bonin Arc; J. Petrol. 43 1029–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wenyan S and Xueyi Z 2013 Review of characteristics and genesis of lithophysae; Acta Geol. Sinica 87 57–59.Google Scholar
  27. White J D L and Houghton B F 2006 Primary volcaniclastic rocks; Geology 34(8) 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson M 2007 Igneous Petrogenesis; Chapman & Hall, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN-13 978-0-412-53310-5 (PB).Google Scholar
  29. Williams H and McBirney A R 1979 Volcanology; Freeman, Cooper and Company, San Francisco, 397p.Google Scholar
  30. Winchester J A and Floyd P A 1977 Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements; Chem. Geol. 20 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zachariah J K, Bhaskar Rao Y J, Srinivasan R and Gopalan K 1999 Pb, Sr, Nd isotope systematic of Uranium mineralized stromatolitic dolomites from the Proterozoic Cuddapah Supergroup, South India: Constraints on age and provenance; Chem. Geol. 162 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sukanta Goswami
    • 1
  • P K Upadhyay
    • 1
  • Sangeeta Bhagat
    • 1
  • Syed Zakaulla
    • 1
  • A K Bhatt
    • 1
  • V Natarajan
    • 1
  • Sukanta Dey
    • 2
  1. 1.Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and ResearchBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology (ISM)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations