Evidence of topographic disequilibrium in the Subarnarekha River Basin, India: A digital elevation model based analysis

Article
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

Cratonic areas experience complex process-response changes due to their operative endogenic and exogenic forces varying in intensity and spatiality over long timescales. Unlike zones of active deformation, the surface expression of the transient signals in relatively tectonically stable areas are usually scant. The Subarnarekha River Basin, in eastern India, is a prime example of a Precambrian cratonic landscape, overlain in places by Tertiary and Quaternary deposits. A coupled quantitative-qualitative approach is employed towards deciphering tectonic and geological influences across linear and areal aspects, at the basin and sub-basin scale. Within this landscape, the transient erosional signatures are explored, as recorded in the disequilibrium conditions of the longitudinal profiles of the major streams, which are marked by a number of waterfalls at structural and lithological boundaries. Mathematical expressions derived from the normalized longitudinal profiles of these streams are used to ascertain their stage of development. Cluster analysis and chi plots provide significant interpretations of the role of vertical displacements or litho-structural variations within the basin. These analyses suggest that a heterogeneous, piece-meal response to the ongoing deformation exists in the area, albeit, determining the actual rate of this deformation or its temporal variation is difficult without correlated chronological datasets.

Keywords

Neotectonics longitudinal profile DEM morphometry geological structure stream response 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of some students of the Department of Geography, Presidency University, Kolkata, (namely, Mr Pranav Pratik, Mr Jayesh Mukherjee, Mr Soumik Das and Mr Biman Biswas), who willingly provided some of the field photographs of the various waterfalls within the Subarnarekha River Basin. Authors are grateful to Prof. Chalapathi Rao and the anonymous reviewer for their constructive reviews and suggestions which improved the clarity of an earlier version of this paper.

Supplementary material

12040_2017_884_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (docx 1384 KB)
12040_2017_884_MOESM2_ESM.docx (113 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (docx 112 KB)
12040_2017_884_MOESM3_ESM.docx (275 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (docx 275 KB)

References

  1. Abdullah S N and Abdoh G A 2013 Landsat ETM-7 for lineament mapping using automatic extraction technique in the SW part of Taiz Area, Yemen; Glob. J. Hum.-Soc. Sci. Res. 13 35–37.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmadi R, Ouali J, Mercier E, Mansy J-L, Lanoë B V-V, Launeau P, Rhekhiss F and Rafini S 2006 The geomorphologic responses to hinge migration in the fault-related folds in the southern Tunisian Atlas; J. Struct. Geol. 28 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambili V and Narayana A C 2014 Tectonic effects on the longitudinal profiles of the Chaliyar River and its tributaries, southwest India; Geomorphology 217 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azañón J M, Galve J P, Pérez-Peña J V, Giaconia F, Carvajal R, Booth-Rea G, Jabaloy A, Vázquez M, Azor A and Roldán F J 2015 Relief and drainage evolution during the exhumation of the Sierra Nevada (SE Spain): Is denudation keeping pace with uplift?; Tectonophys. 663 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerji A K, Mitra S K and Mukhopadhyaya S C 1970 Tectonic sequence in the Sini–Saraikela region, Singhbhum district; Quart. J. Geol. Min. Met. Soc. India 42 141–149.Google Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj K 2006 Physical Geography: Hydrosphere; Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. Bookhagen B and Burbank D W 2010 Toward a complete Himalayan hydrological budget: Spatiotemporal distribution of snowmelt and rainfall and their impact on river discharge; J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 115 F03019.Google Scholar
  8. Bookhagen B and Strecker M W 2008 Orographic barriers, high-resolution TRMM rainfall, and relief variations across the eastern Andes; Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 L06403.Google Scholar
  9. Brunsden D and Thornes J B 1979 Landscape sensitivity and change; Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 4 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bukhari A Z 2006 Encyclopedia of Nature of Geography; Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  11. Burbank D W and Anderson R S 2011 Tectonic Geomorphology; John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burbank D W, Leland J, Fielding E, Anderson R S, Brozovic N, Reid M R and Duncan C 1996 Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas; Nature 379 505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterjee S, Krishna A P and Sharma A P 2014 Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India; Environ. Earth Sci. 71 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colberg J S and Anders A M 2014 Numerical modeling of spatially-variable precipitation and passive margin escarpment evolution; Geomorphology 207 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dandapat K and Panda G K 2013 Drainage and floods in the Subarnarekha Basin in Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India – a study in applied geomorphology; Int. J. Sci. Res. 4 791–797.Google Scholar
  16. Duncan C, Masek J and Fielding E 2003 How steep are the Himalaya? Characteristics and implications of along-strike topographic variations; Geology 31 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. England P and Molnar P 1990 Surface uplift, uplift of rocks, and exhumation of rocks; Geology 18 1173–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flint J J 1974 Stream gradient as a function of order, magnitude, and discharge; Water Resour. Res. 10 969–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H and Arnold J G 2007 The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions; Trans. ASABE 50 1211–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geomatics P C I 2015 Tutorials; PCI Geomatics, Richmond Hill, Cannada.Google Scholar
  21. Giri S, Singh A K and Tewary B K 2013 Source and distribution of metals in bed sediments of Subarnarekha River, India; Environ. Earth Sci. 70 3381–3392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hack J T 1973 Stream profile analysis and stream-gradient index; J. Res. U.S. Geol. Surv. 1 421–429.Google Scholar
  23. Han J G and Choi S J 2014 Stream analysis of small drainage basins in an ancient landform, Korean Peninsula; J. Asian Earth Sci. 95 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harbor D and Gunnell Y 2007 Along-strike escarpment heterogeneity of the Western Ghats: A synthesis of drainage and topography using digital morphometric tools; Geol. Soc. India 70 411–426.Google Scholar
  25. Haviv I, Enzel Y, Whipple K X, Zilberman E, Matmon A, Stone J and Fifield K L 2010 Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling; J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 115.Google Scholar
  26. Howard A D 1994 A detachment-limited model of drain-age basin evolution; Water Resour. Res. 30 2261–2285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard A D and Kerby G 1983 Channel changes in badlands; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 94 739–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kale V S, Achyuthan H and Sengupta S 2010 Reconstruction of Late Quaternary Fluvio-sedimentary response of Kaveri and Palar Rivers: based on Chronostratigraphy, Digital Geomorphometry and Remote Sensing Analysis. University of Pune, Pune.Google Scholar
  29. Kale V S and Shejwalkar N 2007 Western Ghat escarpment evolution in the Deccan basalt province: Geomorphic observations based on DEM analysis; Geol. Soc. India 70 459–473.Google Scholar
  30. Kocal A, Duzgun H S and Karpuz C 2007 An accuracy assessment methodology for the remotely sensed discontinuities: A case study in Andesite Quarry area, Turkey; Int. J. Rem. Sens. 28 3915–3936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar P 1982 Diastrophic forces and their geomorphic expression in Ranchi Plateau; In: Perspectives in Geomorphology (ed.) Sharma H S, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi 4 195–210.Google Scholar
  32. Lee C S and Tsai L L 2010 A quantitative analysis for geomorphic indices of longitudinal river profile: A case study of the Choushui River, Central Taiwan; Environ. Earth Sci. 59 1549–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lima A G and Binda A L 2013 Lithologic and structural controls on fluvial knickzones in basalts of the Paraná Basin, Brazil; J. South Am. Earth Sci. 48 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin Z and Oguchi T 2006 DEM analysis on longitudinal and transverse profiles of steep mountainous watersheds; Geomorphol. 78 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahadevan T M 2002 Text Book Series 14: Geology of Bihar and Jharkhand; Geol. Soc. India, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  36. Mandal S K, Lupker M, Burg J P, Valla P G, Haghipour N and Christl M 2015 Spatial variability of 10 Be-derived erosion rates across the southern Peninsular Indian escarpment: A key to landscape evolution across passive margins; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 425 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazumder R, Van Loon A J, Mallik L, Reddy S M, Arima M, Altermann W, Eriksson P G and De S 2012 Mesoarchaean–Palaeoproterozoic stratigraphic record of the Singhbhum crustal province, eastern India: A systhesis; Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 365 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Misra S and Johnson P T 2005 Geochronological constraints on evolution of Singhbhum mobile belt and associated basic volcanics of eastern Indian shield; Gondwana Res. 8 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Molin P and Corti G 2015 Topography, river network and recent fault activity at the margins of the Central Main Ethiopian Rift (East Africa); Tectonophys. 664 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moran P A 1950 Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena; Biometrika 37 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mukhopadhyay S C 1977 Geomorphology of a part of the lower Kharkai basin; Geogr. Rev. India 39 248–258.Google Scholar
  42. Mukhopadhyay S C 1973 River terraces of Subernarekha Basin; Geogr. Rev. India 35 152–170.Google Scholar
  43. Nag S K and Chakraborty S 2003 Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area; J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 31 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niyogi D 1968 Morphology of the terraces of the Subarnarekha river, India; In: Selected papers 21st International Geographical Congress, pp. 84–88.Google Scholar
  45. Ord J K and Getis A 1995 Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application; Geogr. Anal. 27 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patel P P and Sarkar A 2010 Terrain characterization using SRTM data; J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sens. 38 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pérez-Peña J V, Azañón J M, Booth-Rea G, Azor A and Delgado J 2009 Differentiating geology and tectonics using a spatial autocorrelation technique for the hypsometric integral; J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 114.Google Scholar
  48. Perron J T and Royden L 2013 An integral approach to bedrock river profile analysis; Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 38 570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perumal N V A S, Kak S N and Katti V J 1986 Integrated remote sensing approach to uranium exploration in India; In: Atomic Energy Agency (ed.) Geological Data Integration Techniques: Proc. Technical Committee Meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, No. IAEA-TECDOC-472, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp. 131–164.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips J D 1998 Earth surface systems: Complexity, order, and scale; Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Prasad A D, Jain K and Gairola A 2013 Mapping of lineaments and knowledge base preparation using geomatics techniques for part of the Godavari and Tapi basins, India: A case study; Int. J. Comput. Appl. 70 39–47.Google Scholar
  52. Prince P S, Spotila J A and Henika W S 2011 Stream capture as driver of transient landscape evolution in a tectonically quiescent setting; Geology 39 823–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raj K S and Ahmed S A 2014 Lineament extraction from southern Chitradurga Schist belt using Landsat TM, ASTER GDEM and geomatics techniques; Int. J. Comput. Appl. 93 12–20.Google Scholar
  54. Rao M G 1962 Investigation of manganese and other mineral occurrences in Midnapore District, West Bengal, Progress Report for the Season 1961–1962 (GSI-CHQ-1226); Geological Survey of India, Kolkata.Google Scholar
  55. Reusser L J, Bierman P R, Pavich M J, Zen E, Larsen J and Finkel R 2004 Rapid late Pleistocene incision of Atlantic passive-margin river gorges; Science 305 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saha A K 1994 Crustal evolution of Singhbhum–North Orissa, eastern India; Geol. Soc. India Memoir, Geological Survey of India, Kolkata 27 341.Google Scholar
  57. Sangode S J, Meshram D C, Kulkarni Y R, Gudadhe S S, Malpe D B and Herlekar M A 2013 Neotectonic response of the Godavari and Kaddam rivers in Andhra Pradesh, India: Implications to quaternary reactivation of old fracture system; J. Geol. Soc. India 81 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sarkar A N 1982 Structural and petrological evolution of the Precambrian rocks in western Singhbhum, Bihar; Geol. Surv India Memoirs, Geological Survey of India, Kolkata 113 97p.Google Scholar
  59. Schwanghart W and Kuhn N J 2010 TopoToolbox: A set of Matlab functions for topographic analysis; Environ. Model. Softw. 25 770–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shankar B, Tornabene L L, Osinski G R, Roffey M, Bailey J M and Smith D 2016 Automated lineament extraction technique for the sudbury impact structure using remote sensing datasets – An update; In: Proc. 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conf., Texas 47 1424.Google Scholar
  61. Singh O P 1980 Geomorphology of drainage basins in Palamau upland; Recent Trends Concepts Geogr. 1 229–247.Google Scholar
  62. Sklar L and Dietrich W E 1998 River longitudinal profiles and bedrock incision models: Stream power and the influence of sediment supply; In: Rivers over Rock: Fluvial Processes in Bedrock Channels (eds) Tinkler K J and Wohl E, American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., pp. 237–260.Google Scholar
  63. Snyder N P, Whipple K X, Tucker G E and Merritts D J 2000 Landscape response to tectonic forcing: Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 112 1250–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stock J D and Montgomery D R 1999 Geologic constraints on bedrock river incision using the stream power law; J. Geophys. Res. B104 4983–4993.Google Scholar
  65. Strecker M R, Hilley G E, Arrowsmith J R and Coutand I 2003 Differential structural and geomorphic mountain-front evolution in an active continental collision zone: The northwest Pamir, southern Kyrgyzstan; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 115 166–181.Google Scholar
  66. Tarboton D G, Bras R L and Rodriguez-Iturbe I 1991 On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data; Hydrol. Process. 5 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas M F 2001 Landscape sensitivity in time and space – an introduction; Catena 42 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thornbury W D 1954 Principles of Geomorphology, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Valdiya K S 2001 Tectonic resurgence of the Mysore plateau and surrounding regions in cratonic southern India; Curr. Sci. 81 1068–1089.Google Scholar
  70. Whipple K X and Tucker G E 1999 Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs; J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104 17,661–17,674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whipple K X, Wobus C, Kirby E, Crosby B and Sheehan D 2007 New tools for quantitative geomorphology: Extraction and interpretation of stream profiles from digital topographic data; Short Course presented at the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  72. Willett S D, McCoy S W, Perron J T, Goren L and Chen C Y 2014 Dynamic reorganization of river basins; Science 343 1248765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Willgoose G, Bras R L and Rodriguez-Iturbe I 1991 A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory; Water Resour. Res. 27 1671–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wobus C W, Crosby B T and Whipple K X 2006a Hang-ing valleys in fluvial systems: Controls on occurrence and implications for landscape evolution; J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 111.Google Scholar
  75. Wobus C W, Whipple K X, Kirby E, Snyder N, Johnson J, Spyropolou K, Crosby B and Sheehan D 2006b Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls; Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper 398 55–74.Google Scholar
  76. Yarrakula K, Deb D and Samanta B 2010 Hydrodynamic modeling of Subernarekha River and its floodplain using remote sensing and GIS techniques; J. Sci. Ind. Res. 69 529–536.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth Sciences DisciplineIndian Institute of TechnologyGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations