Study on the groundwater sustainable problem by numerical simulation in a multi-layered coastal aquifer system of Zhanjiang, China

Article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

Assessing sustainability of coastal groundwater is significant for groundwater management as coastal groundwater is vulnerable to over-exploitation and contamination. To address the issues of serious groundwater level drawdown and potential seawater intrusion risk of a multi-layered coastal aquifer system in Zhanjiang, China, this paper presents a numerical modelling study to research groundwater sustainability of this aquifer system. The transient modelling results show that the groundwater budget was negative (\(-3826\times 10^{4}\) to \(-4502\times 10^{4 }\,\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {a}\)) during the years 2008–2011, revealing that this aquifer system was over-exploited. Meanwhile, the groundwater sustainability was assessed by evaluating the negative hydraulic pressure area (NHPA) of the unconfined aquifer and the groundwater level dynamic and flow velocity of the offshore boundaries of the confined aquifers. The results demonstrate that the Nansan Island is most influenced by NHPA and that the local groundwater should not be exploited. The results also suggest that, with the current groundwater exploitation scheme, the sustainable yield should be \(1.784\times 10^{8}\, \hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {a}\) (i.e., decreased by 20% from the current exploitation amount). To satisfy public water demands, the 20% decrease of the exploitation amount can be offset by the groundwater sourced from the Taiping groundwater resource field. These results provide valuable guidance for groundwater management of Zhanjiang.

Keywords

Numerical modelling coastal multi-layered aquifers groundwater resources sustainability groundwater level dynamics negative hydraulic pressure area Zhanjiang 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. Our research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41502255).

References

  1. Alfaro P, Liesch T and Goldscheider N 2017 Modelling groundwater over-extraction in the southern Jordan Valley with scarce data; Hydrogeol. J. 25(5) 1319–1340, doi:  10.1007/s10040-017-1535-y.
  2. Alley W M and Leake S A 2004 The journey from safe yield to sustainability; Groundwater 42 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayvaz M T and Karahan H 2008 A simulation/optimization model for the identification of unknown groundwater well locations and pumping rates; J. Hydrol. 357 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barazzuoli P, Nocchi M, Rigati R and Salleolini M 2008 A conceptual and numerical model for groundwater management: A case study on a coastal aquifer in southern Tuscany; Hydrogeol. J. 16 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow P M and Reichard E G 2010 Saltwater intrusion in coastal regions of North America; Hydrogeol. J. 18 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandio A S, Lee T S and Mirjat M S 2012 The extent of waterlogging in the lower Indus Basin (Pakistan) – A modeling study of groundwater levels; J. Hydrol. 426–427 103–111.Google Scholar
  7. Chuang M-H and Yeh H-D 2007 An analytical solution for the head distribution in a tidal leaky confined aquifer extending an infinite distance under the sea; Adv. Water Resour. 30 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Filippis G, Foglia L, Giudici M, Mehl S, Margiotta S and Negri S L 2016 Seawater intrusion in karstic, coastal aquifers: Current challenges and future scenarios in the Taranto area (southern Italy); Sci. Total Environ. 573 1340–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dogrul E C, Kadir T N, Brush C F and Chung F I 2016 Linking groundwater simulation and reservoir system analysis models: The case for California’s Central Valley; Environ. Model. Softw. 77 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Kadi AI, Tillery S, Whittier R B, Hagedorn B, Mair A, Ha K and Koh G-W 2014 Assessing sustainability of groundwater resources on Jeju Island, South Korea, under climate change, drought, and increased usage; Hydrogeol. J. 22 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eshtawi T, Evers M, Tischbein B and Diekkrüger B 2016 Integrated hydrologic modeling as a key for sustainable urban water resources planning; Water Res. 101 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson G and Gleeson T 2012 Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to climate change and groundwater use; Nat. Clim. Change 2 342–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological Bureau 2009a Report of regional hydrogeologic investigation of Donghai island (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological Bureau 2009b Monitoring report of the groundwater dynamics of Zhanjiang city in 2008 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological Bureau 2010 Monitoring report of the groundwater dynamics of Zhanjiang city in 2009 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological Bureau 2011 Monitoring report of the groundwater dynamics of Zhanjiang city in 2010 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  17. First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological Bureau 2012 Monitoring report of the groundwater dynamics of Zhanjiang city in 2011 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Ghassemi F, Close A and Kellett J R 1997 Numerical models for the management of land and water resources salinization; Math. Comput. Simulat. 43 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gleeson T, Alley W M, Allen D M, Sophocleous M A, Zhou Y, Taniguchi M and VanderSteen J 2012 Towards sustainable groundwater use: Setting long-term goals, backcasting, and managing adaptively; Groundwater 50 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green N R and MacQuarrie K T B 2014 An evaluation of the relative importance of the effects of climate change and groundwater extraction on seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers in Atlantic Canada; Hydrogeol. J. 22 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heydari F, Saghafian B and Delavar M 2016 Coupled quantity-quality simulation-optimization model for conjunctive surface-groundwater use; Water Resour. Manag. 30 4381–4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jang C S, Chen C F, Liang C P and Chen J S 2016 Combining groundwater quality analysis and a numerical flow simulation for spatially establishing utilization strategies for groundwater and surface water in the Pingtung Plain; J. Hydrol. 533 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jhorar R K, Smit A A M F R and Roest C W J 2009 Assessment of alternative water management options for irrigated agriculture; Agric. Water Manag. 96 975–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalf F R P and Woolley D R 2005 Applicability and methodology of determining sustainable yield in groundwater systems; Hydrogeol. J. 13 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knowling M J, Werner A D and Herckenrath D 2015 Quantifying climate and pumping contributions to aquifer depletion using a highly parameterised groundwater model: Uley South Basin (South Australia); J. Hydrol. 523 515–530.Google Scholar
  26. Kourakos G and Mantoglou A 2011 Simulation and multi-objective management of coastal aquifers in semi-arid regions; Water Resour. Manag. 25(4) 1063–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kourakos G and Mantoglou A 2013 Development of a multi-objective optimization algorithm using surrogate models for coastal aquifer management; J. Hydrol. 479 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lathashri U A and Mahesha A 2016 Groundwater sustainability assessment in coastal aquifers; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 125 1103–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lemieux J-M, Hassaoui J, Molson J, Therrien R, Therrien P, Chouteau M and Ouellet M 2015 Simulating the impact of climate change on the groundwater resources of the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada; J. Hydrol. 3 400–423.Google Scholar
  30. Lu W, Yang Q, Martin J D and Juncosa R 2013 Numerical modelling of seawater intrusion in Shenzhen (China) using a 3D density-dependent model including tidal effects; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 122 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo Q and Su Z H 2007 The characteristic analysis and the prevention and control methods from the sea water invasion in Naozhou island; J. Geol. Hazard Environ. Preserv. 18 28–32 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  32. Maimone M 2004 Defining and managing sustainable yield; Groundwater 42 809–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehdizadeh S S, Karamalipour S E and Asoodeh R 2017 Sea level rise effect on seawater intrusion into layered coastal aquifers (simulation using dispersive and sharp-interface approaches); Ocean Coast. Manag. 138 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narayan K A, Schleeberger C and Bristow K L 2007 Modelling seawater intrusion in the Burdekin delta irrigation area, North Queensland, Australia; Agríc. Water Manag. 89 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nocchi M and Salleolini M 2013 A 3D density-dependent model for assessment and optimization of water management policy in a coastal carbonate aquifer exploited for water supply and fish farming; J. Hydrol. 492 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paniconi C, Khlaifi I, Lecca G, Giacomelli A and Tarhouni J 2001 Modeling and analysis of seawater intrusion in the coastal aquifer of eastern Cap-Bon, Tunisia; Transport Porous Med. 43 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pongkijvorasin S, Roumasset J, Duarte T K and Burnett K 2010 Renewable resource management with stock externalities: Coastal aquifers and submarine groundwater discharge; Resour. Energy Econ. 32 277–291.Google Scholar
  38. Rejani R, Jha M K, Panda S N and Mull R 2008 Simulation modeling for efficient groundwater management in Balasore coastal basin, India; Water Resour. Manag. 22 23–50.Google Scholar
  39. Rejani R, Jha M K and Panda S N 2009 Simulation-optimization modeling for sustainable groundwater management in a coastal basin of Orissa, India; Water Resour. Manag. 23 235–263.Google Scholar
  40. Renau-Pruñonosa A, Morell I and Pulido-Velazquez D 2016 A methodology to analyse and assess pumping management strategies in coastal aquifers to avoid degradation due to seawater intrusion problems; Water Resour. Manag. 30 4823–4837.Google Scholar
  41. Sefelnasr A, Gossel W and Wycisk P 2015 Groundwater management options in an arid environment: The Nubian sandstone aquifer system, Eastern Sahara; J. Arid Environ. 122 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh A 2010 Decision support for on-farm water management and long-term agricultural sustainability in a semi-arid region of India; J. Hydrol. 391 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh A 2014 Groundwater resources management through the applications of simulation modeling: A review; Sci. Total Environ. 499 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sreekanth J and Datta B 2010 Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models; J. Hydrol. 393(3–4) 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Su Z H 2005 The layout of the monitoring system of groundwater in Zhanjiang to prevent seawater invasion; Geotech. Investig. Surv. 2 17–21 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  46. Teng Y, Su J, Wang J, Dai N, Li J, Song L and Zuo R 2014 Soil microbial community response to seawater intrusion into coastal aquifer of Donghai Island, South China; Environ. Earth Sci. 72 3329–3338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang X J, Li H L, Wan L, Liu F and Jiao X 2012 Loading effect of water table variation and density effect on tidal head fluctuation in a coastal aquifer system; Water Resour. Res. 48 W09501.Google Scholar
  48. Wassef R and Schüttrumpf H 2016 Impact of sea-level rise on groundwater salinity at the development area western delta, Egypt; Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2–3 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Webb M D and Howard K W F 2011 Modeling the transient response of saline intrusion to rising sea-levels; Groundwater 49(4) 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Werner A D and Simmons C T 2009 Impact of sea-level rise on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers; Groundwater 47(2) 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu B, Zheng Y, Wu X, Tian Y, Han F, Liu J and Zheng C 2015 Optimizing water resources management in large river basins with integrated surface water-groundwater modeling: A surrogate-based approach; Water Resour. Res. 51 2153–2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yi L, Ma B, Liu L, Tang G and Wang T 2016 Simulation of groundwater-seawater interaction in the coastal surficial aquifer in Bohai Bay, Tianjin, China; Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 177 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yidana S M, Alo C, Addai M O, Fynn O F and Essel S K 2015 Numerical analysis of groundwater flow and potential in parts of a crystalline aquifer system in Northern Ghana; Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12 3805–3818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu X, Yang J, Graf T, Koneshloo M, O’Neal M A and Michael H A 2016 Impact of topography on groundwater salinization due to ocean surge inundation; Water Resour. Res. 52 5794–5812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zeng X, Wu J, Wang D and Zhu X 2016 Assessing the pollution risk of a groundwater source field, at western Laizhou Bay under seawater intrusion; Environ. Res. 148 586–594.Google Scholar
  56. Zhang W J, Tan H B, Chen X, Cao J F, Zhang G T and Zhou H F 2012 Geochemical evolution and formation mechanism of groundwater in Naozhou Island, Guangdong province; J. China Hydrol. 32 51–59 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  57. Zhou P, Li G and Lu Y 2016 Numerical modeling of tidal effects on groundwater dynamics in a multi-layered estuary aquifer system using equivalent tidal loading boundary condition: Case study in Zhanjiang, China; Environ. Earth Sci. 75 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou X, Chen M and Liang C 2003 Optimal schemes of groundwater exploitation for prevention of seawater intrusion in the Leizhou Peninsula in southern China; Environ. Geol. 43 978–985.Google Scholar
  59. Zhou X, Yan X, Li J, Yao J and Dai W 2007 Evolution of the groundwater environment under a long-term exploitation in the coastal area near Zhanjiang, China; Environ. Geol. 51 847–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Chinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.The First Hydrogeological Team, Guangdong Geological BureauZhanjiangChina

Personalised recommendations