Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 125, Issue 6, pp 1189–1204 | Cite as

Assessing the consistency between AVHRR and MODIS NDVI datasets for estimating terrestrial net primary productivity over India

  • R K Nayak
  • N Mishra
  • V K Dadhwal
  • N R Patel
  • M Salim
  • K H Rao
  • C B S Dutt
Article

Abstract

This study examines the consistency between the AVHRR and MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) datasets in estimating net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) over India during 2001–2006 in a terrestrial ecosystem model. Harmonic analysis is employed to estimate seasonal components of the time series. The stationary components (representing long-term mean) of the respective NDVI time series are highly coherent and exhibit inherent natural vegetation characteristics with high values over the forest, moderate over the cropland, and small over the grassland. Both data exhibit strong semi-annual oscillations over the cropland dominated Indo-Gangetic plains while annual oscillations are strong over most parts of the country. MODIS has larger annual amplitude than that of the AVHRR. The similar variability exists on the estimates of NPP and NEP across India. In an annual scale, MODIS-based NPP budget is 1.78 PgC, which is 27% higher than the AVHRR- based estimate. It revealed that the Indian terrestrial ecosystem remained the sink of atmospheric CO 2 during the study period with 42 TgC y −1 NEP budget associated with MODIS-based estimate against 18 TgC y −1 for the AVHRR-based estimate.

Keywords

Net ecosystem productivity net primary productivity carbon cycle NDVI CASA India 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is carried out under National Carbon Project (NCP) of ISRO Geosphere and Biosphere Program (ISRO-GBP). We sincerely thank the Director, IIRS for his encouragement and supports. We also thank MODIS and GIMMS teams at NASA for making available NDVI data at the public domains for use in this study.

References

  1. Agrawal S, Joshi P K, Shukla Y and Roy P S 2003 SPOT VEGETATION multi-temporal data for classifying vegetation in south central Asia; Curr. Sci. 84 (11) 1440–1448.Google Scholar
  2. Bala G, Joshi J, Chaturvedi R K, Gangamani H V, Hashimoto H and Nemani R 2013 Trends and variability of AVHRR-derived NPP in India; Remote Sens. 5 810–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown M, Pinzón J, Didan K, Morisette J and Tucker C 2006 Evaluation of the consistency of long-term NDVI time series derived from AVHRR, SPOT-vegetation, SeaWiFS, MODIS, and Landsat ETM + sensors; Geosci. Remote Sens., IEEE Trans. 44 (7) 1787–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonan G B 1995 Land–atmosphere interactions for climate change system models: Coupling biophysical, biogeochemical and ecosystem dynamical processes; Remote Sens. Environ. 51 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai J 2011 A phenological comparison of NDVI products within contiguous United States, MS thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 54p.Google Scholar
  6. Chen W J, Chen J, Liu J and Cihlar J 2000 Approaches for reducing uncertainties in regional forest carbon balance; Global Biogeochem. Cycles 14 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fensholt R, Rasmussen K, Nielsen T and Mbow C 2009 Evaluation of earth observation based long term vegetation trends – Intercomparing NDVI time series trend analysis consistency of Sahel from AVHRR GIMMS, Terra MODIS and SPOT VGT data; Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (9) 1886–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallo K, Lei J., Reed B, Eidenshink J and Dwyer J 2005 Multi-platform comparisons of MODIS and AVHRR normalized difference vegetation index data; Remote Sens. Environ. 99 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gitelson A and Kaufman Y 1998 MODIS NDVI optimization to fit the AVHRR data series – spectral considerations; Remote Sens. Environ. 66 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt E R J, Piper S C, Nemani R, Keeling C D, Otto R D and Running S W 1996 Global net carbon exchange and intra-annual atmospheric CO 2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three-dimensional atmospheric transport model; Global Biogeochem. Cycles 10 (3) 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Justino F, Setzer A, Bracegirdle T J, Endes D, Grimm A, Dechiche G and Schaefer C E G R 2010 Harmonic analysis of climatological temperature over Antarctica: Present day and greenhouse warming perspectives; Int. J. Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.2090.Google Scholar
  12. Li F and Ramanathan V 2002 Winter to summer monsoon variation of aerosol optical depth over the tropical Indian Ocean; J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D16) 4284. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moulin S, Kergoat L, Viovy N and Dedieu G 1997 Global-scale assessment of vegetation phenology using NOAA/AVHRR satellite measurements; J. Climate 10 1154–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nayak R K, Patel N R and Dadhwal V K 2010 Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model; J. Environ. Monit. Assess. 170 (1–4) 195–213. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1226-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nayak R K, Patel N R and Dadhwal V K 2013 Inter-annual variability and climate control of terrestrial of net primary productivity over India; Int. J. Climatol. 33 (1) 132–142. doi: 10.1002/joc.3414..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nayak R K, Patel N R and Dadhwal V K 2015 Spatio-temporal variability of net ecosystem productivity over India and its relationship to climatic variables; J. Environ. Earth Sci. 74 (2) 1743–1753. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4182-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piao S, Fang J, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S and Wang T 2009 The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China; Nature 458 1009–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B, Matson P A, Vitousek P M and Mooney H A 1993 Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data; Global Biogeochem. Cycle 7 811–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prasad A K, Singh R P, Singh A and Kafatos M 2005 Seasonal variability of aerosol optical depth over Indian subcontinent: Analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing images, International Workshop IEEE, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  20. Prentice I C et al. 2001 The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide, In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds) Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J, Noguer M, van der Linden P J, Dai X, Maskell K and Johnson C A, Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds C A, Jackson T J and Rawls W J 1999 Estimated available water content from the FAO soil map of the world, global soil profile databases, pedo-transfer functions; NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  22. Rouse J W, Haas R H, Schell J A, Deering D W and Harlan J C 1974 Monitoring the vernal advancement of retrogradation of natural vegetation; NASA/GSFC Type III Final Rep., 371p.Google Scholar
  23. Tarnavsky E, Garrigues S and Brown M 2008 Multiscale geostatistical analysis of AVHRR, SPOT-VGT, and MODIS global NDVI products; Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (2) 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teillet P, Staenz K and William D 1997 Effects of spectral, spatial, and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions; Remote Sens. Environ. 61 (1) 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tian H, Melillo J M, Kicklighter D W . 2003 Regional carbon dynamics in monsoon Asia and its implications for the global carbon cycle; Global Planet. Change 37 201–217.Google Scholar
  26. Tucker C J, Pinzon J, Brown M, Slayback D, Pak E W, Mahoney R, Vermote E and Saleous N E 2005 Extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compartable with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data; Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 4485–4498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner D P, Ollinger S V and Kimball J S 2004 Integrating remote sensing and ecosystem process models for landscape-to-regional-scale analysis of the carbon cycle; J. BioSci. 54 (6) 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Valsala V, Tiwary Y K, Pillai P, Roxy M, Maksyutov S and Murtugudde R 2013 Intraseasonal variability of terrestrial biospheric CO 2 fluxes over India during summer monsoons; J. Geophys. Res. 118 752–769. doi: 10.1002/jgrg.20037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vermote E F, Saleous N Z E and Justice C O 2002 Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: First results; Remote Sens. Environ. 83 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wagenseil H and Samimi C 2006 Assessing spatio-temporal variations in plant phenology using Fourier analysis on NDVI time series: Results from a dry savannah environment in Namibia; Int. J. Remote Sens. 27 (16) 3455–3471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • R K Nayak
    • 1
  • N Mishra
    • 1
  • V K Dadhwal
    • 1
  • N R Patel
    • 2
  • M Salim
    • 1
  • K H Rao
    • 1
  • C B S Dutt
    • 1
  1. 1.National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC)Indian Space Research OrganizationHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)Indian Space Research OrganisationDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations