Variation of surface electric field during geomagnetic disturbed period at Maitri, Antarctica
- 188 Downloads
The paper discusses on the variations of the atmospheric vertical electric field measured at sub-auroral station Maitri (70∘75′S, 11∘75′E), and polar station Vostok (78.5∘S, 107∘E) during the geomagnetic disturbances on 25–26 January 2006. Diurnal variation of surface electric field measured at Maitri shows a similar variation with worldwide thunderstorm activity, whereas the departure of the field is observed during disturbed periods. This part of the field corresponds to the magnetospheric/ionospheric (an additional generator in the polar regions) voltage generators. Solar wind parameters and planetary indices represent the temporal variation of the disturbances, and digital fluxgate magnetometer variation continuously monitored to trace the auroral movement at Maitri. We have observed that the electrojet movement leaves its signature on vertical and horizontal components of the DFM in addition; the study infers the position of auroral current wedge with respect to Maitri. To exhibit the auroral oval, OVATION model is obtained with the aid of DMSP satellite and UV measurements. It is noted that the Maitri is almost within the auroral oval during the periods of disturbances. To examine the simultaneous changes in the vertical electric field associated with this magnetic disturbance, the dawn–dusk potential is studied for every UT hours; the potential was obtained from Weimer model and SuperDARN radar. The comparison reveals the plausible situation for the superposition of dawn–dusk potential on surface electric field over Maitri. This observation also shows that the superposition may not be consistent with the phase of the electrojet. Comparison of surface electric field at Maitri and Vostok shows that the parallel variation exhibits with each other, but during the period of geomagnetic disturbances, the influence is not much discerned at Vostok.
KeywordsAtmospheric electric field magnetic storm magnetosphere ionosphere global electrical circuit.
We, the authors, gratefully acknowledge referees for their valuable suggestions, which helped in making improvements on the original version. We gratefully acknowledge CDAWeb and the Kyoto Data Center for providing the ACE and geomagnetic activity indices used in this study. We acknowledge JHU/APL for getting auroral oval image under the OVATION project. We also thank the PIs of the SuperDARN radars, Daniel Weimer’s models and CEDAR. The Ministry of Earth Science, Government of India, for conducting a variety of experiments at the Indian Antarctic station, Maitri, is gratefully acknowledged.
- Anil Kumar C P, Panneerselvam C, Nair K U, Jeeva K, Selvaraj C, Gurubaran S and Rajaram R 2008 Influence of coronal mass ejections on global electric circuit; Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 37 39–45.Google Scholar
- Anil Kumar C P, Gopalsingh R, Selvaraj C, Nair K U, Jayakumar H J, Vishnu R, Muralidas S and Balan N 2013 Atmospheric electric parameters and micrometeorological processes during the solar eclipse on 15 January 2010; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118 5098–5104, doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Apsen A G, Kanonidi K D, Chernyshova S P, Chetaev D N and Sheftel V M 1988 Magnitosfernyeeffekty v atmosfernomelektrichestve (Magnetospheric effects in atmospheric electricity); Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
- Bandilet O I, Kanonidi K D, Chernysheva S P and Sheftel V M 1986 Effects of magnetospheric substorms in the atmospheric electric field; Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 26 159.Google Scholar
- Bering E A, Few A A and Benbrook J R 1998 The global electric circuit; Phys. Today 51 (10) 2–30.Google Scholar
- Burns G B, Tinsley A, Frank-Kamenetsky A V, Troshichev O A, French W J R and Klekociuk R 2012 Monthly diurnal global atmospheric circuit estimates derived from Vostok electric field measurements adjusted for local meteorological and solar wind influences; J. Atmos. Sci. 69 2061–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cobb W E 1977 Atmospheric electric measurements at the south pole; In: Electrical Processes in Atmospheres (eds) Dolezalek H and Reiter R, Steinkopff, Darmstadt, Fed. Repub. Ger., pp. 161–167.Google Scholar
- Frank-Kamenetsky A V, Burns G B, Troshichev O A, Papitashvili V O, Bering E A and French W J R 1999 The geoelectric field at Vostok, Antarctica: Its relation to the interplanetary magnetic field and the cross polar cap potential difference; J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 61 1347–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frank-Kamenetsky A V, Kotikov A, Kruglov L A, Burns G B, Kleimenova N G, Kozyreva O V, Kubitski M and Odzimek A 2012 Variations in the near-surface atmospheric electric field at high latitudes and ionospheric potential during geomagnetic perturbations; Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 52 (5) 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Israel H 1973 Atmospheric electricity, Publ. Nat. Sci. Foundation by the Israel Program for Sci. Transl. Google Scholar
- Kasemir H W 1955 Measurement of the air–earth current density; In: Proc. Conf. Atmos. Electricity; Geophys. Res. Pap., 42, 91–95, Air Force Cambridge Res. Cent, Bedford, Mass.Google Scholar
- Kruglov A A and Frank-Kamenetsky A V 2010 Studying the relation between the electric potential of the high latitude ionosphere and the vertical component of the near-earth electric field; TrInstPriklGeofiz 88 54–59.Google Scholar
- Luk’yanova Y. R, Kruglov A A, Frank-Kamenetsky A V, Kotikov A L, Barns G B and French V D R 2011 Relationship between the ionospheric potential and the ground-level electric field in the southern Polar Cap; Geomagn. Aeron. 51 (3) 387–396. (Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 2011, 51 383–393).Google Scholar
- Manu S, Panneerselvam C, Nair K U and Gurubaran S 2013 Design and fabrication of an electrometer for the measurement of atmospheric potential; Environ. Sci. 8 (11) 442–452.Google Scholar
- Mathpal K C and Varshneya N C 1982 Riming electrification mechanism for charge generation within a thundercloud of finite dimensions; Ann. Geophys. 38 (1) 67–75.Google Scholar
- Nikiforova N N, Kleimenova N G, Kozyreva O V, Kubicki M and Michnowski S 2003 Influence of auroral-latitude precipitation of energetic electrons on variations in the atmospheric electric field at polar latitudes (Spitsbergen Archipelago); Geomagn. Aeron. 43 (1) 32–39 (Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 43 29–35).Google Scholar
- Odzimek A and Lester M 2009 Modeling the Earth’s global atmospheric electric circuit–development, challenges and directions, In: Publs. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sci. (eds) Baranski P and Kubicki M, D-73 (214).Google Scholar
- Odzimek A, Kubicki M, Lester M and Grocott A 2011 Relation between SuperDARN ionospheric potential and ground electric field at polar station hornsund, Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Atmospheric Electricity, Rio de Janeiro, 2011.Google Scholar
- Panneerselvam C, Jeeva K, Ajay D., Rajaram R, Gurubaran S and Rajaram G 2004 Observations of atmospheric Maxwell current at Indian Antarctic Station, Maitri – Indian Expedition to Antarctica; Scientific Report; Tech. Publ. 17 99–105.Google Scholar
- Panneerselvam C, Selvaraj C, Jeeva K, Nair K U, Anilkumar C P and Gurubaran S 2007a Fair weather atmospheric electricity at Antarctica during local summer as observed from Indian station, Maitri; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116 (3) 179–186.Google Scholar
- Panneerselvam C, Nair K U, Selvaraj C, Jeeva K, Anil Kumar C P and Gurubaran S 2007b Diurnal variation of atmospheric Maxwell current over the low-latitude continental station, Tirunelveli, India (87∘N, 778∘E); Earth Planet. Space 59 429–435.Google Scholar
- Reiff P H and Luhmann J G 1986 Solar wind control of the polar cap potential, in solar wind-magnetospheric coupling (eds) Kamide Y and Slavin J A, 453 Terra Sci., Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Richmond A D 1986 Upper-atmospheric electric field sources; In: Study in Geophysics – The Earth’s electrical environment; Natl. Acad. Press, Washington DC, pp. 195–205.Google Scholar
- Roble R G and Tzur I 1986 The global atmosphere electrical circuit, in the earth’s electrical environment (eds) Krider E P and Roble R G, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington DC, pp. 206– 231.Google Scholar
- Suzanne Mary Imber, Milan S E and Lester M 2012 The Heppner–Maynard boundary measured by SuperDARN as a proxy for the latitude of the auroral oval; J. Geophys. Res., doi: 10.1029/2012ja018222.
- Tinsley B A, Weiping L, Rohrbaugh R P and Kirkland M W 1998 South Pole electric field responses to overhead ionospheric convection; J. Geophys. Res 103 (D20) 6137–6146.Google Scholar
- Virkkula A, Vana M, Hirsikko A, Aalto P A, Kulmala M and Hillamo R 2005 Air ion mobility and aerosol particle size distributions at the Finnish Antarctic research stationAboa; In: Abstracts of the European Aerosol Conference (ed.) W Maenhaut, Elsevier, New York, 698p.Google Scholar